Department of Nursing II, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country, Paseo Doctor Begiristain, 107, 20014, Donostia/San Sebastián, Guipuzkoa, Spain.
Department of Nursing I, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country, Bº Sarriena s/n, 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
Maturitas. 2019 May;123:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
To determine the strength of the association between objectively and subjectively measured physical activity (PA) and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in a sample of older adults to assess which measure of PA is most appropriate for use in this population.
The study was a cross-sectional analysis of a community-dwelling sample aged 60 years or more (61 women and 34 men). Data collection included anthropometric measurements, blood analytics, and objective and subjective measurements of PA from accelerometers and Yale PA Survey questionnaires, respectively.
Although the questionnaire indicated a higher summary index (total units) of PA in men than in women, objective measurements of total PA (mean counts per minute and steps per day) did not differ by sex. However, we obtained different results between women and men when we analyzed the relation between objective and subjective PA parameters and CVRF. In women, parameters that indicate cardiovascular risk, such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), glucose, and total cholesterol, negatively correlated with objective PA parameters, while HDLc positively correlated with objective PA parameters and negatively with subjective PA parameters. In men, BMI and WC were negatively correlated with objective PA parameters, while blood cholesterol, LDLc, and triglycerides negatively correlated with subjective PA parameters.
In women, it seems more appropriate to use objective methods to measure PA, while in men, objective and subjective methods seem to be complementary. Both methods of measurement, accelerometers and questionnaires, should be used simultaneously in research studies in older populations to establish precise relationships between PA and cardiovascular risk.
确定客观和主观测量的身体活动(PA)与心血管危险因素(CVRF)之间在老年人群样本中的关联强度,以评估哪种 PA 测量方法最适合该人群。
该研究是一项对 60 岁及以上社区居住的样本(61 名女性和 34 名男性)的横断面分析。数据收集包括人体测量学测量、血液分析以及分别来自加速度计和耶鲁 PA 调查问卷的客观和主观 PA 测量。
尽管问卷显示男性的 PA 总综合指数(总单位)高于女性,但客观测量的总 PA(平均每分钟计数和每天步数)在性别之间没有差异。然而,当我们分析客观和主观 PA 参数与 CVRF 之间的关系时,我们在女性和男性之间获得了不同的结果。在女性中,表明心血管风险的参数,如体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、葡萄糖和总胆固醇,与客观 PA 参数呈负相关,而高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLc)与客观 PA 参数呈正相关,与主观 PA 参数呈负相关。在男性中,BMI 和 WC 与客观 PA 参数呈负相关,而血液胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLc)和甘油三酯与主观 PA 参数呈负相关。
在女性中,使用客观方法测量 PA 似乎更为合适,而在男性中,客观和主观方法似乎是互补的。在老年人群的研究中,应同时使用加速度计和问卷这两种测量方法,以确定 PA 与心血管风险之间的精确关系。