Department of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lung Cancer. 2019 May;131:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
The PD-L1 biomarker is an important factor in selecting patients with non-small cell lung cancer for immunotherapy. While several reports suggest that PD-L1 positivity is linked to a poor prognosis, others suggest that PD-L1 positive status portends a good prognosis.
PD-L1 positivity prevalence, assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays (TMAs), and its association with clinicopathological characteristics, molecular profiles and patient outcome- Relapse-free Survival (RFS), Time-to-Relapse (TTR) and Overall Survival (OS)- is explored in the ETOP Lungscape cohort of stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumors are considered positive if they have ≥1/5/25/50% neoplastic cell membrane staining.
PD-L1 expression was assessed in 2182 NSCLC cases (2008 evaluable, median follow-up 4.8 years, 54.6% still alive), from 15 ETOP centers. Adenocarcinomas represent 50.9% of the cohort (squamous cell: 42.4%). Former smokers are 53.7% (current: 31.6%, never: 10.5%). PD-L1 positivity prevalence is present in more than one third of the Lungscape cohort (1%/5% cut-offs). It doesn't differ between adenocarcinomas and squamous cell histologies, but is more frequently detected in higher stages, never smokers, larger tumors (1/5/25% cut-offs). With ≥1% cut-off it is significantly associated with IHC MET overexpression, expression of PTEN, EGFR and KRAS mutation (only for adenocarcinoma). Results for 5%, 25% and 50% cut-offs were similar, with MET being significantly associated with PD-L1 positivity both for AC (p < 0.001, 5%/25%/50% cut-offs) and SCC (p < 0.001, 5% & 50% cut-offs and p = 0.0017 for 25%). When adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics, a significant prognostic effect was identified in adenocarcinomas (adjusted p-values: 0.024/0.064/0.063 for RFS/TTR/OS 1% cut-off, analogous for 5%/25%, but not for 50%). Similar results obtained for the model including all histologies, but no effect was found for the squamous cell carcinomas.
PD-L1 positivity, when adjusted for clinicopathological characteristics, is associated with a better prognosis for non-metastatic adenocarcinoma patients.
PD-L1 生物标志物是选择非小细胞肺癌患者进行免疫治疗的一个重要因素。虽然有几份报告表明 PD-L1 阳性与预后不良有关,但也有其他报告表明 PD-L1 阳性预示着良好的预后。
通过组织微阵列(TMA)上的免疫组织化学(IHC)评估 PD-L1 阳性率,并探讨其与临床病理特征、分子谱和患者结局-无复发生存(RFS)、复发时间(TTR)和总生存(OS)的关系-在 ETOP Lungscape 队列中对 I-III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)进行研究。如果肿瘤细胞膜染色的肿瘤细胞≥1/5/25/50%,则认为肿瘤为阳性。
在来自 15 个 ETOP 中心的 2182 例 NSCLC 病例(2008 例可评估,中位随访 4.8 年,54.6%仍存活)中评估了 PD-L1 表达。腺癌占队列的 50.9%(鳞癌:42.4%)。前吸烟者占 53.7%(当前:31.6%,从不:10.5%)。Lungscape 队列中超过三分之一的患者存在 PD-L1 阳性(1%/5%截止值)。它在腺癌和鳞癌之间没有差异,但在更高的分期、从不吸烟者、更大的肿瘤中更常被检测到(1%/5%/25%截止值)。对于≥1%的截止值,它与 IHC MET 过表达、PTEN、EGFR 和 KRAS 突变的表达显著相关(仅适用于腺癌)。5%、25%和 50%截止值的结果相似,MET 与 AC(p<0.001,5%/25%/50%截止值)和 SCC(p<0.001,5%和 50%截止值和 p=0.0017)中的 PD-L1 阳性均显著相关。在调整临床病理特征后,在腺癌中发现了显著的预后影响(调整后的 p 值:RFS/TTR/OS 1%截止值为 0.024/0.064/0.063,类似的 5%/25%,但 50%则无)。在包括所有组织学的模型中也获得了类似的结果,但在鳞癌中没有发现效果。
在调整临床病理特征后,PD-L1 阳性与非转移性腺癌患者的预后较好相关。