• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析游离 DNA 片段大小分布:一种潜在的非侵入性标志物,用于监测代谢性疾病活体相关肝移植中移植物损伤。

Analysis of fragment size distribution of cell-free DNA: A potential non-invasive marker to monitor graft damage in living-related liver transplantation for inborn errors of metabolism.

机构信息

Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Mol Genet Metab. 2019 May;127(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.03.004
PMID:31027872
Abstract

Graft-derived-cell-free DNA (Gcf-DNA) in plasma is a promising biomarker to monitor graft-rejection after liver transplantation (LTx). However, current methods of measuring Gcf-DNA have several limitations including high cost, long turnaround-time and the need to request donor's genetic information. In this study, eleven patients diagnosed with different inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) who required living-related LTx were enrolled in order to establish a potentially useful noninvasive method to monitor graft damage. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from plasma specimens serially collected at specific time points (day 0, day 1, day 7, day 14, day 30, day 60) after LTx. The distribution of Gcf-DNA fragment sizes was measured using sequencing read lengths and quantified by using Y-chromosome capture methodology in seven sex-mismatched recipients. In the analysis of fragment size distribution, we observed Gcf-DNA exhibited smaller fragment sizes than the recipient-cfDNA. Based on this phenomenon, two fragment sizes (105-145 bp, 160-170 bp) of the cfDNA pool were extracted to enrich Gcf-DNA. Accordingly, the ratio of short fragments to long fragments (S/L-Frag) in cfDNA was calculated. A high S/L-Frag ratio pointed towards an early trend of graft injury when compared to two routine liver function enzymes (ALT and AST) and Gcf-DNA, and it significantly correlated with ALT (P < 0.0001) and AST (P < 0.0001) during full-blown rejection. In conclusion, we established the Gcf-DNA size profile in patients who have undergone living-related LTx and established a potential biomarker to monitor graft function after LTx.

摘要

血浆中的移植物衍生无细胞 DNA (Gcf-DNA) 是监测肝移植 (LTx) 后移植物排斥的有前途的生物标志物。然而,目前测量 Gcf-DNA 的方法存在一些局限性,包括成本高、周转时间长以及需要请求供体的遗传信息。在这项研究中,纳入了 11 名诊断为不同先天性代谢错误 (IEM) 的患者,这些患者需要进行活体相关的 LTx,以便建立一种潜在有用的非侵入性方法来监测移植物损伤。从 LTx 后特定时间点(第 0 天、第 1 天、第 7 天、第 14 天、第 30 天、第 60 天)连续采集血浆标本,提取循环无细胞 DNA (cfDNA)。使用测序读取长度测量 Gcf-DNA 片段大小的分布,并使用 Y 染色体捕获方法在 7 名性别不匹配的受者中定量。在片段大小分布分析中,我们观察到 Gcf-DNA 的片段大小小于受者 cfDNA。基于这一现象,从 cfDNA 池中提取了两个片段大小(105-145 bp、160-170 bp)以富集 Gcf-DNA。相应地,计算了 cfDNA 中短片段与长片段的比例(S/L-Frag)。与两种常规肝功能酶(ALT 和 AST)和 Gcf-DNA 相比,高 S/L-Frag 比值指向早期移植物损伤趋势,并且与 ALT(P < 0.0001)和 AST(P < 0.0001)在完全排斥期间显著相关。总之,我们建立了接受活体相关 LTx 的患者的 Gcf-DNA 大小谱,并建立了一种潜在的生物标志物来监测 LTx 后的移植物功能。

相似文献

1
Analysis of fragment size distribution of cell-free DNA: A potential non-invasive marker to monitor graft damage in living-related liver transplantation for inborn errors of metabolism.分析游离 DNA 片段大小分布:一种潜在的非侵入性标志物,用于监测代谢性疾病活体相关肝移植中移植物损伤。
Mol Genet Metab. 2019 May;127(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Detecting Graft-Derived Cell-Free DNA Through Amplification Refractory Mutation System Polymerase Chain Reaction in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Report of 2 Cases.通过扩增阻滞突变系统聚合酶链反应检测活体肝移植中移植物来源的游离DNA:2例报告
Transplant Proc. 2019 Apr;51(3):820-822. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.11.011. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
3
Application of graft-derived cell-free DNA in ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency patient after living donor liver transplantation: Two case reports.移植物来源的游离DNA在活体供肝移植后鸟氨酸转氨甲酰酶缺乏症患者中的应用:两例病例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(51):e13843. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013843.
4
Graft-derived cell-free DNA, a noninvasive early rejection and graft damage marker in liver transplantation: A prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study.移植来源的游离DNA,肝移植中一种用于早期排斥反应和移植物损伤的非侵入性标志物:一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 25;14(4):e1002286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002286. eCollection 2017 Apr.
5
Sequencing data of cell-free DNA fragments in living-related liver transplantation for inborn errors of metabolism.用于代谢性先天性疾病的活体亲属肝移植中游离DNA片段的测序数据。
Data Brief. 2020 Jan 25;29:105183. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105183. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
Preliminary clinical experience applying donor-derived cell-free DNA to discern rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients.应用供体来源无细胞游离 DNA 来辨别小儿肝移植受者排斥反应的初步临床经验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80845-6.
7
Donor-specific circulating cell free DNA as a noninvasive biomarker of graft injury in heart transplantation.供体特异性循环无细胞 DNA 作为心脏移植中移植物损伤的无创生物标志物。
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Aug;495:590-597. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
8
Digital droplet PCR for rapid quantification of donor DNA in the circulation of transplant recipients as a potential universal biomarker of graft injury.数字液滴 PCR 快速定量移植受者循环中的供体 DNA,作为移植物损伤的潜在通用生物标志物。
Clin Chem. 2013 Dec;59(12):1732-41. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.210328. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
9
Clinical relevance of cell-free DNA quantification and qualification during the first month after lung transplantation.肺移植后第一个月游离 DNA 定量和定性的临床意义。
Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1183949. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1183949. eCollection 2023.
10
Rapid detection of donor cell free DNA in lung transplant recipients with rejections using donor-recipient HLA mismatch.利用供受者HLA错配快速检测发生排斥反应的肺移植受者中游离供体细胞DNA。
Hum Immunol. 2017 Apr;78(4):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances and challenges in the application of donor-derived cell-free DNA for diagnosis and treatment in liver transplantation: a narrative review.供体来源的游离DNA在肝移植诊断和治疗中的应用进展与挑战:一篇叙述性综述
BMC Surg. 2025 May 13;25(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02911-y.
2
Application of graft-derived cell-free DNA for solid organ transplantation.移植物无细胞游离 DNA 在实体器官移植中的应用。
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 23;15:1461480. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1461480. eCollection 2024.
3
Multidimensional fragmentomic profiling of cell-free DNA released from patient-derived organoids.
从患者来源的类器官中释放的无细胞 DNA 的多维片段组学分析。
Hum Genomics. 2023 Oct 28;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00533-0.
4
Cell-Free DNA as a Surveillance Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients after Liver Transplant.游离DNA作为肝移植后肝细胞癌患者的监测工具
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;15(12):3165. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123165.
5
Utility of Cell-Free DNA Detection in Transplant Oncology.游离DNA检测在移植肿瘤学中的应用
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 31;14(3):743. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030743.
6
Total and endothelial cell-derived cell-free DNA in blood plasma does not change during menstruation.血浆中的总细胞和内皮细胞游离 DNA 在月经期间不会发生变化。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250561. eCollection 2021.
7
Donor-specific cell-free DNA as a biomarker in liver transplantation: A review.供体特异性游离DNA作为肝移植生物标志物的综述
World J Transplant. 2020 Nov 28;10(11):307-319. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i11.307.
8
Size profile of cell-free DNA: A beacon guiding the practice and innovation of clinical testing.游离 DNA 大小谱:指导临床检测实践和创新的灯塔。
Theranostics. 2020 Mar 26;10(11):4737-4748. doi: 10.7150/thno.42565. eCollection 2020.
9
Sequencing data of cell-free DNA fragments in living-related liver transplantation for inborn errors of metabolism.用于代谢性先天性疾病的活体亲属肝移植中游离DNA片段的测序数据。
Data Brief. 2020 Jan 25;29:105183. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105183. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
Current Trends in Applications of Circulatory Microchimerism Detection in Transplantation.循环微嵌合体检测在移植中的应用的当前趋势。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 10;20(18):4450. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184450.