• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测单吻合口胃旁路手术早期并发症的临床决策支持系统。

A Clinical Decision Support System for Predicting the Early Complications of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery.

机构信息

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2019 Jul;29(7):2276-2286. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03849-w.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-019-03849-w
PMID:31028626
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: One of the most effective treatments for patients with obesity, albeit with some complications, is obesity surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to predict the early complications of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) surgery.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: This study was conducted in Tehran, Iran on patients who underwent OAGB surgery in 2011-2014 in five hospitals. Initially, variables affecting the OAGB early complications were identified using the literature review. Patients' data were extracted from an existing database of obesity surgery. Then, different artificial neural networks (ANNs) (multilayer perceptron (MLP) network) were developed and evaluated for prediction of 10-day, 1-month, and 3-month complications.

RESULTS

Factors including age, BMI, smoking status, intra-operative complications, comorbidities, laboratory tests, sonography results, and endoscopy results were considered important factors for predicting early complications of OAGB. A CDSS was developed with these variables. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the 10-day prediction system in the test data were 98.4%, 98.6%, and 98.3%, respectively. These figures for 1-month system were 96%, 93%, and 98.4% and for the 3-month system were 89.3%, 86.6%, and 91.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the CDSS designed, we could accurately predict the early complications of OAGB surgery.

摘要

背景/目的:肥胖手术是治疗肥胖症患者的最有效方法之一,尽管存在一些并发症。本研究旨在开发一种临床决策支持系统(CDSS),以预测单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)手术的早期并发症。

受试者/方法:本研究在伊朗德黑兰进行,对 2011 年至 2014 年期间在五家医院接受 OAGB 手术的患者进行研究。首先,通过文献回顾确定了影响 OAGB 早期并发症的变量。从肥胖手术的现有数据库中提取患者数据。然后,开发并评估了不同的人工神经网络(ANNs)(多层感知器(MLP)网络),以预测 10 天、1 个月和 3 个月的并发症。

结果

包括年龄、BMI、吸烟状况、术中并发症、合并症、实验室检查、超声结果和内窥镜结果在内的因素被认为是预测 OAGB 早期并发症的重要因素。利用这些变量开发了一个 CDSS。在测试数据中,10 天预测系统的准确性、特异性和敏感性分别为 98.4%、98.6%和 98.3%。1 个月系统的这些数字分别为 96%、93%和 98.4%,3 个月系统的分别为 89.3%、86.6%和 91.5%。

结论

使用设计的 CDSS,我们可以准确预测 OAGB 手术的早期并发症。

相似文献

1
A Clinical Decision Support System for Predicting the Early Complications of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery.一种用于预测单吻合口胃旁路手术早期并发症的临床决策支持系统。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jul;29(7):2276-2286. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03849-w.
2
Complications Following the Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB): a Multi-institutional Survey on 2678 Patients with a Mid-term (5 Years) Follow-up.迷你/单吻合口胃旁路术(MGB/OAGB)后的并发症:一项对2678例患者进行中期(5年)随访的多机构调查
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov;27(11):2956-2967. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2726-2.
3
Protein-Calorie Malnutrition Requiring Revisional Surgery after One-Anastomosis-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Case Series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).一吻合迷你胃旁路术后需要再次手术的蛋白能量营养不良:来自德黑兰肥胖治疗研究(TOTS)的病例系列。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1714-1720. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03741-7.
4
Short- and Mid-term Outcomes of 527 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Operations: Retrospective Study.527 例单吻合胃旁路术/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)手术的短期和中期结果:回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):262-267. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3516-1.
5
Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.随机对照试验比较 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass 与 Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass 治疗肥胖症:YOMEGA 研究与台湾研究的比较。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3047-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04065-2.
6
Comparison of the Bile Reflux Frequency in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Cohort Study.一种吻合术胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术胆汁反流频率的比较:一项队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1721-1725. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03683-6.
7
Understanding Objections to One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass: A Survey of 417 Surgeons Not Performing this Procedure.了解对单吻合口(迷你)胃旁路手术的反对意见:对417名未实施该手术的外科医生的调查
Obes Surg. 2017 Sep;27(9):2222-2228. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2663-0.
8
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 200 or 160 cm: 1-Year Results of the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与胆胰支 200 或 160cm 单吻合胃旁路术的疗效和安全性:德黑兰肥胖治疗研究(TOTS)的 1 年结果。
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3528-3535. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04681-3.
9
Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity.胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖的临床结局比较。
Obes Surg. 2020 Mar;30(3):1021-1031. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04303-7.
10
Results of The Comparative Study of 200 Cases: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.200 例对比研究结果:One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass 与 Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass 比较。
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2597-2602. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3224-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Hair Loss and Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.脱发与代谢及减重手术:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07903-8.
2
Integrating Machine Learning and Dynamic Digital Follow-up for Enhanced Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Bariatric Surgery.整合机器学习与动态数字随访以增强对减重手术术后并发症的预测
Obes Surg. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07894-6.
3
Dumping Syndrome After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-A Systematic Review.单吻合口胃旁路术后倾倒综合征——一项系统评价

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical decision support system for prediction of pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus.一种用于预测系统性红斑狼疮孕妇妊娠结局的临床决策支持系统。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
2
Prediction Model for Hemorrhagic Complications after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Development of SLEEVE BLEED Calculator.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后出血并发症的预测模型:SLEEVE BLEED计算器的开发
Obes Surg. 2017 Apr;27(4):968-972. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2417-4.
3
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini gastric bypass: One year outcomes.
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07860-2.
4
Predicting pregnancy at the first year following metabolic-bariatric surgery: development and validation of machine learning models.代谢减重手术后第一年的妊娠预测:机器学习模型的开发与验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2656-2667. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11640-5. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
5
Prediction of pregnancy outcomes in women with systemic lupus erythematosus before pregnancy: Application of machine learning models.系统性红斑狼疮女性孕前妊娠结局的预测:机器学习模型的应用
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 14;11(4):e42679. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42679. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
6
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Obesity Research and Management: A Comprehensive Review.肥胖研究与管理中人工智能的应用:综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;15(3):396. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15030396.
7
Development of the Korean Quality Improvement Platform in Surgery (K-QIPS) program: a nationwide project to improve surgical quality and patient safety.韩国外科质量改进平台(K-QIPS)项目的发展:一项旨在提高手术质量和患者安全的全国性项目。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Dec;107(6):305-314. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.6.305. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
8
Predicting short-term thromboembolic risk following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using supervised machine learning.使用监督式机器学习预测Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后的短期血栓栓塞风险。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):1097-1108. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1097.
9
Machine learning-based mortality prediction models for smoker COVID-19 patients.基于机器学习的吸烟者 COVID-19 患者死亡率预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 21;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02237-w.
10
The development of machine learning in bariatric surgery.减重手术中机器学习的发展
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 24;10:1102711. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1102711. eCollection 2023.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜迷你胃旁路术:一年期结果。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.051. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
4
Evaluation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score for the prediction of postoperative complications after primary and revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.评估肥胖手术死亡率风险评分对初次及翻修腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后并发症的预测价值。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Sep-Oct;12(8):1504-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
The importance of the Edmonton Obesity Staging System in predicting postoperative outcome and 30-day mortality after metabolic surgery.埃德蒙顿肥胖分期系统在预测代谢手术后的术后结局和30天死亡率方面的重要性。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Dec;12(10):1847-1855. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.042. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
6
Mini Gastric Bypass: first report of 125 consecutive cases from United Kingdom.迷你胃旁路手术:来自英国的125例连续病例的首次报告。
Clin Obes. 2016 Feb;6(1):61-7. doi: 10.1111/cob.12124.
7
Trends in Bariatric Surgery: Procedure Selection, Revisional Surgeries, and Readmissions.减重手术的趋势:手术方式选择、翻修手术及再入院情况
Obes Surg. 2016 Jul;26(7):1371-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1974-2.
8
Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results.针对限制性手术失败的翻修性单吻合口胃旁路术:5年结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Feb;12(2):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.08.521. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
COMPLICATIONS REQUIRING HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY.减肥手术后需要住院治疗的并发症。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-6720201500S100003.
10
Presentation and surgical management of leaks after mini-gastric bypass for morbid obesity.病态肥胖患者迷你胃旁路术后渗漏的表现及外科处理
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Feb;12(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jun 18.