University of Health Sciences, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Emergency Medicine Physician, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;38(1):60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
The aim of the study was to assess whether spinal immobilization with long back board (LBB) and semi-rigid cervical collar (CC) at 20° instead of 0° conserves pulmonary functions in obese volunteers, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio.
The study included adult volunteer subjects with android-type obesity who were otherwise healthy. First, pulmonary functions were tested in a seated position to obtain baseline levels, than volunteers were immobilized with LBB and CC at 0-degree and measurements repeated at 0th and 30th minute of immobilization. Next day, same procedures were repeated with the trauma board at 20-degree. Changes over time in FEV1, FVC values and FEV1/FVC ratios during spinal immobilization at 0° and 20° were compared to baseline levels.
Study included 30 volunteers. Results showed a significant decline in all values for both situations following spinal immobilization (p < .001). We also compared the decrease over time in those values (ΔFEV1, ΔFVC, and ΔFEV1/FVC ratio) during spinal immobilization at 0° and 20°. The decrease in pulmonary functions was similar in both groups (p > .05).
The present findings confirm that spinal immobilization reduces pulmonary functions in obese volunteers, and that 20-degree immobilization has no conservative effect on these values when compared to the traditional 0-degree immobilization. It may be that 20° is insufficient to decrease the negative effect of abdominal obesity on pulmonary functions.
本研究旨在评估与传统 0 度固定相比,20 度长背板(LBB)和半刚性颈圈(CC)固定是否能在肥胖志愿者中保留肺功能,包括 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)和 FEV1/FVC 比值。
本研究纳入了体型肥胖且健康的成年志愿者。首先,志愿者取坐位进行肺功能测试,以获得基础值,然后将志愿者用 LBB 和 CC 固定在 0 度,在固定后 0 分钟和 30 分钟重复测量。次日,用创伤板在 20 度重复相同的操作。比较 0 度和 20 度脊柱固定期间 FEV1、FVC 值和 FEV1/FVC 比值随时间的变化与基础值。
本研究共纳入 30 名志愿者。结果显示,脊柱固定后两种情况下所有值均显著下降(p<0.001)。我们还比较了 0 度和 20 度脊柱固定期间这些值(ΔFEV1、ΔFVC 和 ΔFEV1/FVC 比值)随时间的变化。两组的肺功能下降相似(p>0.05)。
本研究结果证实,脊柱固定会降低肥胖志愿者的肺功能,与传统的 0 度固定相比,20 度固定对这些值没有保守作用。可能是 20 度不足以降低腹部肥胖对肺功能的负面影响。