Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Department of Pharmacy and Section of Pediatric Surgery, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
There are no clear guidelines for the use of mechanical bowel preparation and postoperative antibiotics in children undergoing elective colorectal pull-through surgery. The objective of this study was to determine whether preoperative bowel preparation administration or duration of postoperative antibiotics impacted the rate of complications after elective pediatric pull-through surgery.
Patients aged <18 y who underwent a pull-through procedure between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. Patient data included diagnosis, procedure, administration of mechanical bowel preparation, and duration of perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Outcomes of interest included surgical site infections and anastomotic complications.
A total of 180 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 47.2% received mechanical bowel preparation. The combined rate of infectious and anastomotic complications was 12.2%. There was no significant difference in combined complication rate among those receiving bowel preparation compared with those who did not (14.1% versus 10.5%, P = 0.46). Administration of bowel preparation in the perineal anoplasty subgroup was associated with higher rates of wound infection (33.3% versus 3.3%, P = 0.05). One hundred five patients (58.3%) received perioperative IV antibiotics for ≤24 h. This group had similar rates of complications (13.3%) compared with those receiving IV antibiotics for longer than 24 h (11.6%, P = 0.74).
Although mechanical bowel preparation did not affect the overall complication rate for pull-through procedures, it was associated with more wound infections in those undergoing perineal anoplasty. Duration of postoperative IV antibiotics was not significantly associated with the rate of wound and anastomotic complications.
对于择期行结直肠拖出术的儿童,目前尚无机械性肠道准备和术后使用抗生素的明确指南。本研究旨在确定择期小儿拖出术后肠道准备的应用或术后抗生素的持续时间是否会影响并发症的发生率。
回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2017 年间接受拖出术的年龄<18 岁的患者。患者数据包括诊断、手术、机械性肠道准备的应用和围手术期静脉(IV)抗生素的持续时间。感兴趣的结局包括手术部位感染和吻合口并发症。
共有 180 例患者符合纳入标准,其中 47.2%接受了机械性肠道准备。感染和吻合口并发症的总发生率为 12.2%。与未接受肠道准备的患者相比,接受肠道准备的患者的复合并发症发生率无显著差异(14.1%比 10.5%,P=0.46)。在会阴肛门成形亚组中,肠道准备的应用与更高的伤口感染率相关(33.3%比 3.3%,P=0.05)。105 例(58.3%)患者接受围手术期 IV 抗生素治疗≤24 h。与接受超过 24 h IV 抗生素治疗的患者相比,该组的并发症发生率相似(13.3%比 11.6%,P=0.74)。
尽管机械性肠道准备并未影响拖出术的总体并发症发生率,但它与会阴肛门成形术患者的更多伤口感染相关。术后 IV 抗生素的持续时间与伤口和吻合口并发症的发生率无显著相关性。