University of Exeter.
University of Exeter.
Behav Ther. 2019 May;50(3):504-514. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Depression is a common and costly problem. Behavioral Activation (BA) is an effective treatment for depression when delivered 1:1, but group treatments often do not perform as well as 1:1 treatments. One way to begin to understand how group treatments perform is to assess the process of change during treatment. This study examined trajectories of change across 10-session group BA for individuals with severe, chronic, or recurrent forms of depression. We also tested whether individuals who had associated sudden gains or depression spikes had better outcomes than those who did not have these change patterns. We examined psychological and sociodemographic predictors of the patterns of change. Participants were 104 individuals who met diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder and participated in one of 10 BA groups, provided over a 2-year period. A linear, but not quadratic or cubic, rate of change fit the data and the effect size for the change in mood symptoms from baseline to posttreatment was large, Cohen's d = 1.25. Although 34% (26 of the 77 who provided outcome data) of individuals had a sudden gain and 10% (7/77) had a depression spike, neither sudden gains nor depression spikes predicted posttreatment outcomes. None of the demographic or psychological factors (rumination, behavioral activation) predicted the pattern of change. These results suggest that although group BA may help to reduce depressive symptoms in individuals with severe, recurrent, and/or chronic forms of depression, the overall linear pattern of change is different from quadratic patterns of change reported for 1:1 BA.
抑郁是一个常见且代价高昂的问题。行为激活(BA)是一种有效的治疗方法,当它一对一进行时,对于抑郁症,但群体治疗通常不如一对一治疗效果好。了解群体治疗如何进行的一种方法是评估治疗过程中的变化过程。这项研究检查了 10 节团体 BA 治疗严重、慢性或复发性抑郁症患者的变化轨迹。我们还测试了是否与突然增益或抑郁峰值相关的个体比没有这些变化模式的个体有更好的结果。我们检查了变化模式的心理和社会人口预测因素。参与者是 104 名符合重度抑郁障碍诊断标准并参加了为期 2 年的 10 个 BA 组之一的个体。线性但不是二次或三次的变化率适合数据,从基线到治疗后情绪症状的变化的效应大小较大,Cohen's d = 1.25。尽管 34%(提供结果数据的 77 人中的 26 人)的个体有突然增益,10%(7/77)有抑郁峰值,但突然增益和抑郁峰值都不能预测治疗后的结果。人口统计学和心理因素(反刍、行为激活)都不能预测变化模式。这些结果表明,尽管团体 BA 可能有助于减轻严重、复发性和/或慢性抑郁症患者的抑郁症状,但整体线性变化模式与报告的一对一 BA 的二次变化模式不同。