Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Ward, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:578-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
Whether primary tumor resection is beneficial in patients with metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether palliative resection of primary tumor affected the survival of patients with stage IV NF-pNETs.
We collected data from patients with stage IV NF-pNET registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2015. Risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis and propensity score-matched analysis were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients.
In total, 1974 stage IV NF-pNETs patients were identified, of whom 392 (19.9%) received palliative primary tumor resection. The latter exhibited significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio = 2.514, 95% confidence interval: 2.081-3.037, P < 0.001) and CSS (hazard ratio = 2.634, 95% confidence interval: 2.159-3.213, P < 0.001) in multivariate Cox regression analysis. According to propensity score-matched results, patients without primary tumor resection had worse OS and CSS.
This study demonstrates that there is a significant correlation between palliative resection of primary tumor and survival benefit. Therefore, resection could be considered as an additional treatment option in this specific patient population.
原发肿瘤切除术是否有益于转移性无功能性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(NF-pNET)患者尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨姑息性原发肿瘤切除术是否影响 IV 期 NF-pNET 患者的生存。
我们收集了 2004 年至 2015 年期间在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中登记的 IV 期 NF-pNET 患者的数据。采用风险调整 Cox 比例风险回归分析和倾向评分匹配分析来分析患者的总生存(OS)和癌症特异性生存(CSS)。
共确定了 1974 例 IV 期 NF-pNET 患者,其中 392 例(19.9%)接受了姑息性原发肿瘤切除术。后者的 OS(风险比=2.514,95%置信区间:2.081-3.037,P<0.001)和 CSS(风险比=2.634,95%置信区间:2.159-3.213,P<0.001)在多变量 Cox 回归分析中显著延长。根据倾向评分匹配结果,未行原发肿瘤切除术的患者 OS 和 CSS 较差。
本研究表明,姑息性原发肿瘤切除术与生存获益之间存在显著相关性。因此,切除术可被视为该特定患者群体的附加治疗选择。