Suppr超能文献

评估约旦孕妇食物组摄入量的食物频率问卷的相对有效性和可重复性。

Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Food Group Intake in Pregnant Jordanian Women.

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Aug;119(8):1349-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research on the relationship between maternal diet and pregnancy outcomes requires valid dietary assessment tools in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and examine the relative validity and reproducibility of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to estimate food group intake in a sample of pregnant Jordanian women.

DESIGN

In this validation study, food group intake from a culturally sensitive quantitative FFQ was compared with food group intake from three 24-hour dietary recalls.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

The validation study was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at the maternity clinics in Jordan University Hospital among 131 healthy singleton pregnant Jordanian women. Of these women, 30 also took part in the reproducibility phase, which involved repeated completion of the FFQ in a time frame of 1 month. Pregnant women who had gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and chronic diseases were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relative validity and reproducibility of a 117-item quantitative FFQ used to estimate usual food intake over a period of 1 month.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Intraclass correlation coefficients and weighted κ statistics were calculated to test the reproducibility between the two administrations of the FFQ. Pearson correlations were estimated to validate the FFQ against 24-hour dietary recalls. Cross-classification and Bland-Altman plots were used to examine the agreement between the two dietary assessment methods.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficients between the two FFQs ranged from 0.24 for legumes to 0.93 for processed meats. A moderate level of agreement was observed between two FFQs. De-attenuated and energy-adjusted correlations ranged from 0.08 for sweets and sugar to 0.93 for sugary drinks. On average, 50.9% and 45.2% of participants were classified by the FFQ and the 24-hour dietary recalls into the same quartile based on their crude and energy-adjusted food group intake, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed satisfactory agreement between two methods for most food groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The FFQ showed moderate reproducibility and good relative validity for most food groups.

摘要

背景

研究母体饮食与妊娠结局之间的关系需要在妊娠期间使用有效的饮食评估工具。

目的

本研究旨在开发和检验一种定量食物频率问卷(FFQ),以评估约旦孕妇样本中食物组摄入量的相对有效性和可重复性。

设计

在这项验证研究中,将文化敏感的定量 FFQ 中的食物组摄入量与三种 24 小时膳食回忆中的食物组摄入量进行了比较。

参与者和设置

验证研究于 2015 年至 2017 年在约旦大学医院的妇产科诊所进行,共有 131 名健康的单胎约旦孕妇参加。其中 30 名孕妇还参加了可重复性阶段,即在 1 个月的时间内重复完成 FFQ。患有妊娠糖尿病、先兆子痫和慢性病的孕妇被排除在外。

主要观察结果

用于估计 1 个月期间常规食物摄入量的 117 项定量 FFQ 的相对有效性和可重复性。

统计分析

计算了组内相关系数和加权κ统计量,以检验 FFQ 两次测量之间的可重复性。估计 Pearson 相关系数以验证 FFQ 与 24 小时膳食回忆的相关性。交叉分类和 Bland-Altman 图用于检查两种饮食评估方法之间的一致性。

结果

两种 FFQ 之间的组内相关系数范围为豆类的 0.24 到加工肉类的 0.93。两种 FFQ 之间观察到中等水平的一致性。去衰减和能量调整后的相关性范围从甜食和糖的 0.08 到含糖饮料的 0.93。平均而言,根据粗摄入量和能量调整后的食物组摄入量,50.9%和 45.2%的参与者分别通过 FFQ 和 24 小时膳食回忆被归入相同的四分位数。Bland-Altman 图显示两种方法在大多数食物组之间具有令人满意的一致性。

结论

FFQ 对大多数食物组具有中等的可重复性和良好的相对有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验