Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health (C-BEACH), Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Circulation. 2019 Feb 19;139(8):1036-1046. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035312.
Evidence that higher sedentary time is associated with higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is based mainly on self-reported measures. Few studies have examined whether patterns of sedentary time are associated with higher risk for CVD.
Women from the Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health (OPACH) Study (n=5638, aged 63-97, mean age=79±7) with no history of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke wore accelerometers for 4-to-7 days and were followed for up to 4.9 years for CVD events. Average daily sedentary time and mean sedentary bout duration were the exposures of interest. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CVD using models adjusted for covariates and subsequently adjusted for potential mediators (body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, and CVD-risk biomarkers [fasting glucose, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure]). Restricted cubic spline regression characterized dose-response relationships.
There were 545 CVD events during 19,350 person-years. Adjusting for covariates, women in the highest (≥ ~11 hr/day) vs. the lowest (≤ ~9 hr/day) quartile of sedentary time had higher risk for CVD (HR=1.62; CI=1.21-2.17; p-trend <0.001). Further adjustment for potential mediators attenuated but did not eliminate significance of these associations (p-trend<.05, each). Longer vs. shorter mean bout duration was associated with higher risks for CVD (HR=1.54; CI=1.27-2.02; p-trend=0.003) after adjustment for covariates. Additional adjustment for CVD-risk biomarkers attenuated associations resulting in a quartile 4 vs. quartile 1 HR=1.36; CI=1.01-1.83; p-trend=0.10). Dose-response associations of sedentary time and bout duration with CVD were linear (P-nonlinear >0.05, each). Women jointly classified as having high sedentary time and long bout durations had significantly higher risk for CVD (HR=1.34; CI=1.08-1.65) than women with both low sedentary time and short bout duration. All analyses were repeated for incident coronary heart disease (MI or CVD death) and associations were similar with notably stronger hazard ratios.
Both high sedentary time and long mean bout durations were associated in a dose-response manner with increased CVD risk in older women, suggesting that efforts to reduce CVD burden may benefit from addressing either or both component(s) of sedentary behavior.
更多久坐时间与心血管疾病(CVD)风险增加有关的证据主要基于自我报告的测量结果。很少有研究探讨久坐时间模式是否与 CVD 风险增加有关。
无心肌梗死(MI)或中风病史的客观体力活动和心血管健康(OPACH)研究中的女性(n=5638,年龄 63-97 岁,平均年龄 79±7 岁)佩戴加速度计 4-7 天,并在 4.9 年内最多随访 CVD 事件。平均每日久坐时间和平均久坐时间是感兴趣的暴露因素。使用调整了协变量和随后调整了潜在中介因素(体重指数(BMI)、糖尿病、高血压和 CVD 风险生物标志物[空腹血糖、高密度脂蛋白、甘油三酯和收缩压])的 Cox 回归模型,估算 CVD 的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。受限三次样条回归描述了剂量-反应关系。
在 19350 人年中,发生了 545 例 CVD 事件。调整协变量后,久坐时间最高(≥11 小时/天)与最低(≤9 小时/天)四分位组的女性发生 CVD 的风险更高(HR=1.62;CI=1.21-2.17;p-趋势<0.001)。进一步调整潜在的中介因素虽然削弱了这些关联的显著性,但并未消除(p-趋势<.05,各)。与较短的平均持续时间相比,较长的持续时间与 CVD 风险增加相关(HR=1.54;CI=1.27-2.02;p-趋势=0.003),在调整协变量后。调整 CVD 风险生物标志物后,关联减弱,导致四分位数 4 与四分位数 1 的 HR=1.36;CI=1.01-1.83;p-趋势=0.10)。久坐时间和持续时间与 CVD 的剂量-反应关系呈线性(P-非线性>0.05,各)。久坐时间和持续时间都高的女性患 CVD 的风险显著高于久坐时间和持续时间都低的女性(HR=1.34;CI=1.08-1.65)。所有分析均针对新发冠心病(MI 或 CVD 死亡)进行了重复,并且关联相似,危险比明显更强。
在老年女性中,久坐时间较高和平均持续时间较长均与 CVD 风险呈剂量-反应关系增加有关,这表明减少 CVD 负担的努力可能受益于解决久坐行为的一个或多个组成部分。