Suppr超能文献

肝素快速渗透溶液与双氯芬酸快速渗透溶液预防外周静脉置管引起的浅表性血栓性静脉炎的比较:一项随机双盲研究。

Comparison of Heparin Quick Penetrating Solution and Diclofenac Quick Penetrating Solution for the Prevention of Superficial Thrombophlebitis Caused by Peripheral Venous Cannulation: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

作者信息

Singh Swati

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):155-157. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_189_18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The association of superficial thrombophlebitis (ST) with deep-venous thrombosis varies between 6% and 44%. Thus, prevention of ST is important. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of topical quick penetrating solution (QPS) of heparin 1000 IU/mL versus diclofenac QPS for prevention of postinfusion ST.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was done after ethical clearance and Clinical Trial Registry- India registration to compare 100 patients for the prevention of ST with application of heparin QPS and diclofenac QPS at regular intervals. Patients were randomized into two groups (Group H [control group] - heparin QPS group and Group D - diclofenac QPS group) and the assigned treatment was applied four times daily. The appearance of thrombophlebitis was graded on the basis of infusion nursing society scale. The site of venous cannulation was inspected every 6 h for any changes for the next 5 days.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The parametric data were analyzed using Student's -test and nonparametric data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Of 98, only 10 patients developed thrombophlebitis and all belonged to Group D (23%). No patient belonging to Group H developed thrombophlebitis (0%). This difference was statistically significant ( = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

The QPS formulation of heparine and diclofenac was effective in preventing thrombophlebitis. Heparine QPS is more effective than diclofenac QPS for the same.

摘要

背景与目的

浅表性血栓性静脉炎(ST)与深静脉血栓形成的关联率在6%至44%之间。因此,预防ST很重要。本研究的目的是比较1000 IU/mL肝素局部快速渗透溶液(QPS)与双氯芬酸QPS预防输注后ST的疗效。

设置与设计

这是一项随机、对照、双盲研究。

材料与方法

在获得伦理批准并在印度临床试验注册中心注册后开展本研究,以比较100例患者定期应用肝素QPS和双氯芬酸QPS预防ST的效果。患者被随机分为两组(H组[对照组]——肝素QPS组和D组——双氯芬酸QPS组),指定的治疗每天应用4次。根据输液护理学会量表对血栓性静脉炎的表现进行分级。在接下来的5天里,每6小时检查一次静脉置管部位有无变化。

统计分析

参数数据采用Student's -检验进行分析,非参数数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。

结果

98例患者中,仅10例发生血栓性静脉炎,且均属于D组(23%)。H组无患者发生血栓性静脉炎(0%)。这种差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.034)。

结论

肝素和双氯芬酸的QPS制剂在预防血栓性静脉炎方面有效。在预防血栓性静脉炎方面,肝素QPS比双氯芬酸QPS更有效。

相似文献

4
Treatment for superficial infusion thrombophlebitis of the upper extremity.上肢浅表性输液性血栓性静脉炎的治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 20;2015(11):CD011015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011015.pub2.

本文引用的文献

7
Preventing infection in intravenous therapy.预防静脉治疗中的感染。
Hosp Pract. 1976 Apr;11(4):95-104. doi: 10.1080/21548331.1976.11706520.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验