Kumar Arvind, Asaf Belal Bin
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):60-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147693.
Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has come a long way. It has rapidly progressed to complex procedures such as lobectomy, pneumonectomy, esophagectomy, and resection of mediastinal tumors. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) offered perceptible benefits over thoracotomy in terms of less postoperative pain and narcotic utilization, shorter ICU and hospital stay, decreased incidence of postoperative complications combined with quicker return to work, and better cosmesis. However, despite its obvious advantages, the General Thoracic Surgical Community has been relatively slow in adapting VATS more widely. The introduction of da Vinci surgical system has helped overcome certain inherent limitations of VATS such as two-dimensional (2D) vision and counter intuitive movement using long rigid instruments allowing thoracic surgeons to perform a plethora of minimally invasive thoracic procedures more efficiently. Although the cumulative experience worldwide is still limited and evolving, Robotic Thoracic Surgery is an evolution over VATS. There is however a lot of concern among established high-volume VATS centers regarding the superiority of the robotic technique. We have over 7 years experience and believe that any new technology designed to make minimal invasive surgery easier and more comfortable for the surgeon is most likely to have better and safer outcomes in the long run. Our only concern is its cost effectiveness and we believe that if the cost factor is removed more and more surgeons will use the technology and it will increase the spectrum and the reach of minimally invasive thoracic surgery. This article reviews worldwide experience with robotic thoracic surgery and addresses the potential benefits and limitations of using the robotic platform for the performance of thoracic surgical procedures.
微创胸外科已经取得了长足的发展。它已迅速发展到诸如肺叶切除术、全肺切除术、食管切除术和纵隔肿瘤切除术等复杂手术。电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)在术后疼痛较轻、麻醉药物使用量较少、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间较短、术后并发症发生率降低、恢复工作更快以及美容效果更好等方面,相较于开胸手术具有明显优势。然而,尽管其优势明显,但普通胸外科界在更广泛地采用VATS方面进展相对缓慢。达芬奇手术系统的引入有助于克服VATS的某些固有局限性,如二维(2D)视野以及使用长刚性器械时的反向直觉操作,从而使胸外科医生能够更高效地进行大量微创胸科手术。尽管全球范围内的累积经验仍然有限且仍在不断发展,但机器人胸外科是VATS的一种演进。然而,在一些经验丰富的高容量VATS中心,对于机器人技术的优越性存在诸多担忧。我们拥有超过7年的经验,并且相信任何旨在使外科医生的微创手术更轻松、更舒适的新技术,从长远来看很可能会带来更好、更安全的结果。我们唯一关心的是其成本效益,并且我们相信如果去除成本因素,将会有越来越多的外科医生使用这项技术,这将扩大微创胸外科的范围和影响力。本文回顾了全球范围内机器人胸外科的经验,并探讨了使用机器人平台进行胸科手术的潜在益处和局限性。