• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对小病小伤的护理环境的偏好。

Patients' preferences over care settings for minor illnesses and injuries.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.

Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):827-838. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13154. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13154
PMID:31032907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6606605/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify consumers' preferences over care settings, such as physicians' offices, emergency rooms (ERs), urgent care centers, retail clinics, and virtual physicians on smartphones, for minor illnesses.

DATA SOURCES

A survey conducted between 9/27/16 and 12/7/16 emailed to all University of California, Irvine employees.

STUDY DESIGN

Participants were presented with 10 clinical scenarios and asked to choose the setting in which they wanted to receive care. We estimated multinomial conditional logit regression models, conditioning the choice on out-of-pocket costs, wait time, travel time, and chooser characteristics.

DATA COLLECTION

5451 out of 21 037 employees responded.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Out-of-pocket costs and wait time had minimal impact on patient's preference for site of care. Choices were driven primarily by the clinical scenario and patient characteristics. For chronic conditions and children's well-visits, the doctor's office was the preferred choice by a strong majority, but for most acute conditions, either the ER (for high severity) or urgent care clinics (for lower severity) were preferred to the office setting, particularly among younger patients and those with less education.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients have several alternatives to traditional physicians' offices and ERs. The low impact of out-of-pocket costs suggests that insurers interested in encouraging increased utilization of alternatives would need to consider substantial changes to benefit structure.

摘要

目的

确定患者对医疗服务场所的偏好,例如医生办公室、急诊室(ER)、紧急护理中心、零售诊所和智能手机上的虚拟医生,用于治疗小病。

资料来源

2016 年 9 月 27 日至 12 月 7 日向加利福尼亚大学欧文分校的所有员工发送的调查电子邮件。

研究设计

向参与者展示了 10 种临床情况,并要求他们选择想要接受治疗的场所。我们估计了多项条件逻辑回归模型,根据自付费用、等待时间、旅行时间和选择者特征对选择进行了条件限制。

资料收集

21037 名员工中有 5451 人做出了回应。

主要发现

自付费用和等待时间对患者选择医疗服务场所的偏好影响很小。选择主要取决于临床情况和患者特征。对于慢性疾病和儿童常规健康检查,医生办公室是大多数患者的首选,但对于大多数急性疾病,ER(严重程度高)或紧急护理诊所(严重程度低)比办公室更受欢迎,特别是在年轻患者和受教育程度较低的患者中。

结论

患者有几种替代传统医生办公室和 ER 的选择。自付费用的影响较低表明,有兴趣鼓励增加替代选择的保险公司可能需要考虑对福利结构进行重大改变。

相似文献

1
Patients' preferences over care settings for minor illnesses and injuries.患者对小病小伤的护理环境的偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):827-838. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13154. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
2
Physician office vs retail clinic: patient preferences in care seeking for minor illnesses.医疗机构与零售诊所:小病就诊患者的选择偏好。
Ann Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;8(2):117-23. doi: 10.1370/afm.1052.
3
Primary care safety-net delivery sites in the United States: A comparison of community health centers, hospital outpatient departments, and physicians' offices.美国基层医疗安全网服务机构:社区卫生中心、医院门诊部和医生办公室的比较
JAMA. 2000 Oct 25;284(16):2077-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.16.2077.
4
Re-utilization outcomes and costs of minor acute illness treated at family physician offices, walk-in clinics, and emergency departments.在家庭医生诊所、随诊诊所和急诊科治疗的轻度急性疾病的再利用结果和成本。
Can Fam Physician. 2005 Jan;51(1):82-3.
5
Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses.比较零售诊所与其他医疗场所针对3种常见疾病的护理成本和质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 1;151(5):321-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00006.
6
Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections at retail clinics, physician practices, and emergency departments.零售诊所、医生诊所及急诊科针对呼吸道感染的抗生素处方情况。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Apr;21(4):294-302.
7
The Use and Out-of-Pocket Cost of Urgent Care Clinics and Retail-Based Clinics by Adolescents and Young Adults Compared With Children.青少年和年轻成年人与儿童相比,使用和自付费用的紧急护理诊所和零售诊所。
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Jan;60(1):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Alternatives to Care in Physician Offices: Patients' Expectations and Satisfaction.医生办公室护理的替代方案:患者的期望与满意度。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1598-1600. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4520-9.
9
Cardiovascular disease and risk in primary care settings in the United States.美国初级医疗保健环境中的心血管疾病与风险
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 15;109(4):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.047. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
10
Giving callers the option to bypass the telephone waiting line in out-of-hours services: a comparative intervention study.为来电者提供在非工作时间服务中绕过电话等候队列的选项:一项对比干预研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):120-127. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1569427. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Do Patients Opt for the Emergency Department over Other Care Choices? A Multi-Hospital Analysis.为什么患者选择急诊科而非其他护理选择?一项多医院分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):921-928. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18647.
2
Firework injuries are increasing in the United States: An analysis of the National Emergency Department Sample.美国烟花致伤事件呈上升趋势:对国家急诊科样本的分析
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Dec 3;2(6):e12600. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12600. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Promise and Reality of Price Transparency.价格透明度的前景与现实
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1348-1354. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1715229.
2
Demand elasticities and service selection incentives among competing private health plans.竞争私立医疗保险计划中的需求弹性和服务选择激励。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:352-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.006.
3
Americans Support Price Shopping For Health Care, But Few Actually Seek Out Price Information.美国人支持医疗保健价格比较,但很少有人真正寻求价格信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1471.
4
Direct-To-Consumer Telehealth May Increase Access To Care But Does Not Decrease Spending.直接面向消费者的远程医疗可能会增加医疗服务的可及性,但不会降低支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):485-491. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1130.
5
Virtual Visits for Acute, Nonurgent Care: A Claims Analysis of Episode-Level Utilization.急性非紧急护理的虚拟就诊:基于事件层面利用情况的索赔分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6783.
6
Association Between the Opening of Retail Clinics and Low-Acuity Emergency Department Visits.零售诊所开业与低 acuity 急诊科就诊之间的关联。 (注:这里“low - acuity”不太明确准确意思,可能是“低急症程度”之类的,需结合更多背景信息准确理解。)
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;69(4):397-403.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.462. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Health insurance and the demand for medical care: Instrumental variable estimates using health insurer claims data.健康保险与医疗需求:使用健康保险公司理赔数据的工具变量估计
J Health Econ. 2016 Jul;48:74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
8
Retail Clinic Visits For Low-Acuity Conditions Increase Utilization And Spending.零售诊所针对低 acuity 病症的就诊增加了医疗服务利用率和支出。 (注:这里“acuity”在医学语境中常指“敏锐度、清晰度”等,结合语境可能指病情严重程度等,由于没有更多背景信息,只能直译)
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):449-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0995.
9
Access and Quality of Care in Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine.面向消费者的远程医疗中的医疗服务可及性与质量
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Apr;22(4):282-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0079. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
10
Analysis of Teladoc use seems to indicate expanded access to care for patients without prior connection to a provider.分析表明,使用 Teladoc 似乎可以为那些之前没有与提供者联系过的患者提供更多的医疗服务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):258-64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0989.