Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激与电针对健康受试者工作记忆的影响

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Versus Electroacupuncture on Working Memory in Healthy Subjects.

作者信息

Zhang Wenjing, Lang Shijuan, Zheng Yuxin, Qin Xi, Chen Hongxin, You Yaoyao, Ou Haining

机构信息

1 Department of Rehabilitation, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

2 Experiment Education Model Center of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):637-642. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0532. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

Abstract

Working memory (WM) can influence human thought processes through interactions with perception, long-term memory, and behavior. In recent years, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and electric acupuncture have been used to improve the performance of WM. Therefore, due to the n-back task as a continuous performance task that is commonly used to measure WM, the aim of this study is to investigate the differences in short-term efficacy between tDCS and electroacupuncture on WM under n-back task paradigm in healthy subjects. Forty-four college students (age: 23.70 ± 1.52 years; education: 16.93 ± 2.24 years) were recruited as experimental subjects and randomly divided into two groups by a random double-blind two-stage crossover experiment design. Group A received a tDCS intervention followed by at least 1 week of washout period and then the electroacupuncture intervention. Group B had the opposite sequence of interventions. The WM test under the n-back task paradigm was conducted before and after each intervention, and the changes in the accuracy (number of correct responses) and correct response time (RT) before and after the interventions were detected. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 24.0 to compare the short-term efficacy of tDCS and electroacupuncture on WM under different tasks. In the 0-back task and 1-back tasks, there was no significant difference in the accuracy or RT before and after the interventions between tDCS and electroacupuncture stimulation. In the 2-back task, there was no significant difference in the accuracy before and after interventions between tDCS and electroacupuncture stimulation. However, there was a significant difference in RT ( 0.05), which was lower after tDCS than after electroacupuncture in the 2-back task. The results show that tDCS with anodal stimulation on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex could increase the RT of the 2-back task performance in comparison with electroacupuncture stimulation of the Baihui (GV20) and Shenting (DU24) acupoints. The present results indicate that tDCS may have greater impact on WM in healthy subjects than electroacupuncture stimulation.

摘要

工作记忆(WM)可通过与感知、长期记忆及行为的相互作用来影响人类思维过程。近年来,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和电针已被用于改善工作记忆的表现。因此,鉴于n-back任务作为一种常用于测量工作记忆的持续性操作任务,本研究旨在探讨在n-back任务范式下,tDCS和电针改善健康受试者工作记忆的短期疗效差异。招募了44名大学生(年龄:23.70±1.52岁;受教育年限:16.93±2.24年)作为实验对象,并通过随机双盲两阶段交叉实验设计将其随机分为两组。A组先接受tDCS干预,随后有至少1周的洗脱期,然后接受电针干预。B组的干预顺序相反。在每次干预前后均进行n-back任务范式下的工作记忆测试,并检测干预前后准确性(正确反应次数)和正确反应时间(RT)的变化。使用SPSS 24.0对数据进行统计分析,以比较tDCS和电针在不同任务下改善工作记忆的短期疗效。在0-back任务和1-back任务中,tDCS和电针刺激干预前后的准确性或反应时间均无显著差异。在2-back任务中,tDCS和电针刺激干预前后的准确性无显著差异。然而,反应时间存在显著差异(P<0.05),在2-back任务中,tDCS后的反应时间低于电针后的反应时间。结果表明,与针刺百会(GV20)和神庭(DU24)穴位相比,对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层进行阳极刺激的tDCS可缩短2-back任务表现的反应时间。目前的结果表明,tDCS对健康受试者工作记忆的影响可能比电针刺激更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验