Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗与幼年特发性关节炎相关的难治性葡萄膜炎:一项 RCT。

Adalimumab in combination with methotrexate for refractory uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a RCT.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2019 Apr;23(15):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta23150.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are at risk of uveitis. The role of adalimumab (Humira; AbbVie Inc., Ludwigshafen, Germany) in the management of uveitis in children needs to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of adalimumab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) versus placebo with MTX alone, with regard to controlling disease activity in refractory uveitis associated with JIA.

DESIGN

This was a randomised (applying a ratio of 2 : 1 in favour of adalimumab), double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre parallel-group trial with an integrated economic evaluation. A central web-based system used computer-generated tables to allocate treatments. A cost-utility analysis based on visual acuity was conducted and a 10-year extrapolation by Markov modelling was also carried out.

SETTING

The setting was tertiary care centres throughout the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 2-18 years inclusive, with persistently active JIA-associated uveitis (despite optimised MTX treatment for at least 12 weeks).

INTERVENTIONS

All participants received a stable dose of MTX and either adalimumab (20 mg/0.8 ml for patients weighing < 30 kg or 40 mg/0.8 ml for patients weighing ≥ 30 kg by subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks based on body weight) or a placebo (0.8 ml as appropriate according to body weight by subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks) for up to 18 months. A follow-up appointment was arranged at 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome - time to treatment failure [multicomponent score as defined by set criteria based on the Standardisation of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria]. Economic outcome - incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from the perspective of the NHS in England and Personal Social Services providers. Full details of secondary outcomes are provided in the study protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 90 participants were randomised (adalimumab,  = 60; placebo,  = 30). There were 14 (23%) treatment failures in the adalimumab group and 17 (57%) in the placebo group. The analysis of the data from the double-blind phase of the trial showed that the hazard risk (HR) of treatment failure was significantly reduced, by 75%, for participants in the adalimumab group (HR 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.51;  < 0.0001 from log-rank test). The cost-effectiveness of adalimumab plus MTX was £129,025 per QALY gained. Adalimumab-treated participants had a much higher incidence of adverse and serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab in combination with MTX is safe and effective in the management of JIA-associated uveitis. However, the likelihood of cost-effectiveness is < 1% at the £30,000-per-QALY threshold.

FUTURE WORK

A clinical trial is required to define the most effective time to stop therapy. Prognostic biomarkers of early and complete response should also be identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10065623 and European Clinical Trials Database number 2010-021141-41.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 23, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. This trial was also funded by Arthritis Research UK (grant reference number 19612). Two strengths of adalimumab (20 mg/0.8 ml and 40 mg/0.8 ml) and a matching placebo were manufactured by AbbVie Inc. (the Marketing Authorisation holder) and supplied in bulk to the contracted distributor (Sharp Clinical Services, Crickhowell, UK) for distribution to trial centres.

摘要

背景

儿童幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)患者存在葡萄膜炎风险。阿达木单抗(Humira;艾伯维公司,德国路德维希港)在儿童葡萄膜炎治疗中的作用尚需确定。

目的

比较阿达木单抗联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)与安慰剂联合 MTX 治疗 JIA 相关性难治性葡萄膜炎的疗效、安全性和成本效益,以控制疾病活动。

设计

这是一项随机(阿达木单抗组与安慰剂组的比例为 2∶1)、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心平行组试验,同时进行综合经济评估。中央网络系统采用计算机生成的表格进行治疗分配。进行了基于视力的成本效用分析,并通过马尔可夫模型进行了长达 10 年的外推。

地点

英国的三级护理中心。

参与者

年龄 2-18 岁,持续存在 JIA 相关性葡萄膜炎(尽管已接受至少 12 周的优化 MTX 治疗)的患者。

干预措施

所有参与者均接受稳定剂量的 MTX,同时接受阿达木单抗(体重 < 30kg 的患者为 20mg/0.8ml,体重 ≥ 30kg 的患者为 40mg/0.8ml,根据体重每两周皮下注射一次)或安慰剂(根据体重每两周皮下注射一次),持续 18 个月。安排了 6 个月的随访预约。

主要结局指标

主要结局——治疗失败时间[根据 SUN 标准定义的多组分评分]。经济结局——从英格兰 NHS 和个人社会服务提供者的角度评估每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。研究方案中提供了次要结局的详细信息。

结果

共有 90 名参与者被随机分配(阿达木单抗组 60 名,安慰剂组 30 名)。阿达木单抗组有 14 例(23%)治疗失败,安慰剂组有 17 例(57%)。双盲阶段试验数据分析显示,阿达木单抗组的治疗失败风险显著降低了 75%(风险比 0.25,95%置信区间 0.12 至 0.51;对数秩检验  < 0.0001)。阿达木单抗联合 MTX 的成本效益为每获得一个 QALY 增加 129025 英镑。阿达木单抗治疗组的不良反应和严重不良反应发生率更高。

结论

阿达木单抗联合 MTX 治疗 JIA 相关性葡萄膜炎安全有效。然而,在 30000 英镑/QALY 的阈值下,其成本效益的可能性小于 1%。

未来工作

需要进行临床试验以确定最有效的停药时间。还应确定早期和完全缓解的预测生物标志物。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN8651329 和欧洲临床试验数据库编号 2010-021141-41。

资金

该项目由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,将在 中全文发表;第 23 卷,第 15 期。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。该试验还得到了英国关节炎研究(grant reference number 19612)的资助。两种阿达木单抗(20mg/0.8ml 和 40mg/0.8ml)和一种匹配的安慰剂由艾伯维公司(上市许可持有人)生产,并由合同分销商(英国 Crickhowell 的 Sharp Clinical Services)批量供应,分发给试验中心。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Failure of primary immunosuppressive agents in uveitis.葡萄膜炎中一线免疫抑制剂治疗失败
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 1;73(6):837-842. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2964_24. Epub 2025 May 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验