• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受氯吡格雷和阿司匹林治疗的患者与单独接受阿司匹林治疗的短暂性脑缺血发作或小卒中患者相比发生大出血的风险:POINT 随机临床试验的二次分析。

Risk for Major Hemorrhages in Patients Receiving Clopidogrel and Aspirin Compared With Aspirin Alone After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the POINT Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Data Coordination Unit, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Dean's Office, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):774-782. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0932.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0932
PMID:31034032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6583063/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Results show the short-term risk of hemorrhage in treating patients with acute transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with clopidogrel plus aspirin or aspirin alone.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the frequency and kinds of major hemorrhages in the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis of the POINT randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted in 10 countries in North America, Europe, and Australasia included patients with high-risk TIA or minor AIS who were randomized within 12 hours of symptom onset and followed up for 90 days. The total enrollment, which occurred from May 28, 2010, through December 17, 2017, was 4881 and constituted the intention-to-treat group; 4819 (98.7%) were included in the as-treated analysis group. The primary safety analyses were as-treated, classifying patients based on study drug actually received. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed as secondary analyses. Data were analyzed in April 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned to receive clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 75 mg daily for days 2-90) or placebo; all patients also received open-label aspirin, 50 to 325 mg/d.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary safety outcome was all major hemorrhages. Other safety outcomes included minor hemorrhages.

RESULTS

A total of 269 sites worldwide randomized 4881 patients (median age, 65.0 years [interquartile range, 55-74 years]; 2195 women [45.0%]); the primary results have been published previously. In the as-treated analyses, major hemorrhage occurred in 21 patients (0.9%) receiving clopidogrel plus aspirin and 6 (0.2%) in the aspirin alone group (hazard ratio, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.44-8.85; P = .003; number needed to harm, 159). There were 4 fatal hemorrhages (0.1%; 3 in the clopidogrel plus aspirin group and 1 in the aspirin alone group); 3 of the 4 were intracranial. There were 7 intracranial hemorrhages (0.1%); 5 were in the clopidogrel plus aspirin group and 2 in the aspirin plus placebo group. The most common location of major hemorrhages was in the gastrointestinal tract.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The risk for major hemorrhages in patients receiving either clopidogrel plus aspirin or aspirin alone after TIA or minor AIS was low. Nevertheless, treatment with clopidogrel plus aspirin increased the risk of major hemorrhages over aspirin alone from 0.2% to 0.9%.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00991029.

摘要

重要提示

研究结果显示,氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林或阿司匹林单药治疗急性短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或小面积急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者的短期出血风险。

目的

分析血小板定向抑制在新 TIA 和小面积缺血性中风(POINT)试验中主要出血的频率和类型。

设计、环境和参与者:本研究为多中心、随机、双盲临床试验的二次分析,纳入了发病 12 小时内的高危 TIA 或小面积 AIS 患者,共 4881 例患者随机分为氯吡格雷+阿司匹林组和阿司匹林单药组,随访 90 天。总入组时间为 2010 年 5 月 28 日至 2017 年 12 月 17 日,意向治疗组共 4881 例,实际接受治疗组共 4819 例(98.7%)。主要安全性分析采用按实际接受药物分类的治疗意向分析,次要安全性分析采用意向治疗分析。数据于 2018 年 4 月进行分析。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受氯吡格雷(第 1 天 600 mg 负荷剂量,第 2-90 天每天 75 mg)或安慰剂;所有患者均接受开放性阿司匹林治疗,剂量为 50-325 mg/d。

主要观察指标

主要安全性结局为所有主要出血事件。其他安全性结局包括轻微出血事件。

结果

全球 269 个试验点共纳入 4881 例患者(中位年龄 65.0 岁[四分位间距 55-74 岁];2195 例女性[45.0%]);主要结果已发表。在实际接受治疗的患者中,氯吡格雷+阿司匹林组发生 21 例(0.9%)主要出血事件,阿司匹林组发生 6 例(0.2%)(危险比,3.57;95%置信区间,1.44-8.85;P=0.003;需要治疗的人数,159)。有 4 例死亡性出血(0.1%;氯吡格雷+阿司匹林组 3 例,阿司匹林组 1 例);其中 3 例为颅内出血。颅内出血 7 例(0.1%);氯吡格雷+阿司匹林组 5 例,阿司匹林+安慰剂组 2 例。最常见的主要出血部位为胃肠道。

结论和相关性

TIA 或小面积 AIS 患者接受氯吡格雷+阿司匹林或阿司匹林单药治疗后发生大出血的风险较低。然而,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,氯吡格雷+阿司匹林治疗使大出血风险从 0.2%增加到 0.9%。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00991029。

相似文献

1
Risk for Major Hemorrhages in Patients Receiving Clopidogrel and Aspirin Compared With Aspirin Alone After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the POINT Randomized Clinical Trial.接受氯吡格雷和阿司匹林治疗的患者与单独接受阿司匹林治疗的短暂性脑缺血发作或小卒中患者相比发生大出血的风险:POINT 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):774-782. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0932.
2
Assessment of the End Point Adjudication Process on the Results of the Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trial: A Secondary Analysis.评估新型短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中血小板抑制终点试验(POINT)中终点裁定过程对结果的影响:一项二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910769. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10769.
3
Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA.氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在急性缺血性卒中和高风险 TIA 中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):215-225. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800410. Epub 2018 May 16.
4
Time Course for Benefit and Risk of Clopidogrel and Aspirin After Acute Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Ischemic Stroke.急性短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中后氯吡格雷和阿司匹林获益与风险的时间进程。
Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):658-664. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040713. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 4;369(1):11-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215340. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
6
Aspirin plus clopidogrel aspirin mono-therapy for ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷与阿司匹林单药治疗缺血性脑卒中的Meta 分析。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019 Aug;53(4):169-175. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1620962. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Association Between ABCB1 Polymorphisms and Outcomes of Clopidogrel Treatment in Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.载脂蛋白 B1 基因多态性与小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者氯吡格雷治疗结局的相关性:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 May 1;76(5):552-560. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4775.
8
Outcomes Associated With Clopidogrel-Aspirin Use in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Pooled Analysis of Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Non-Disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) and Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trials.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林用于轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作的疗效:氯吡格雷用于急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者(CHANCE)及新发性短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度缺血性卒中血小板靶向抑制(POINT)试验的汇总分析
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1466-1473. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2531.
9
Clopidogrel and Aspirin Initiated Between 24 to 72 Hours for Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Analysis of the INSPIRES Randomized Clinical Trial.氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在轻度缺血性中风后 24 至 72 小时内开始使用:INSPIRES 随机临床试验的亚组分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31938.
10
Association of CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Metabolizer Status With Stroke Risk Among Chinese Patients Treated With Ticagrelor-Aspirin vs Clopidogrel-Aspirin: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.CYP2C19 功能丧失型代谢酶携带者状态与替格瑞洛-阿司匹林治疗的中国患者卒中风险的相关性:一项随机临床试验的预设二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17037.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravenous thrombolysis or antiplatelet therapy for acute nondisabling ischemic stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.急性非致残性缺血性卒中的静脉溶栓或抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Oct 26:23969873241293323. doi: 10.1177/23969873241293323.
2
Retrospective Analysis of Potential Adverse Drug Interactions in the Drugs Prescribed to the Elderly at a Tertiary Health Care Center in Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Central India.印度中部恰蒂斯加尔邦赖布尔市一家三级医疗保健中心对老年人所开药物中潜在药物不良相互作用的回顾性分析。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 7;16(2):e53767. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53767. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for the Acute Management and Long-term Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack, An Updated Review.缺血性中风和短暂性脑缺血发作的急性处理及长期二级预防的双联抗血小板治疗:最新综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jan 31;11(2):48. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020048.
4
Appropriate use of antiplatelet medications following transient ischemic attacks and stroke: a 9-year study from the Middle East.短暂性脑缺血发作和中风后抗血小板药物的合理使用:来自中东的9年研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1269292. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1269292. eCollection 2023.
5
Progression of Gastrointestinal Injury During Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Secondary Analysis of the OPT-PEACE Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗期间胃肠道损伤的进展:OPT-PEACE 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43219.
6
Antiplatelet Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Secondary Stroke Prevention in the United Kingdom.英国二级卒中预防的抗血小板治疗模式与结局
Cardiol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(4):675-687. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00332-7. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Clopidogrel Administration Impairs Post-Stroke Learning and Memory Recovery in Mice.氯吡格雷给药可损害卒中后小鼠的学习和记忆恢复能力。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 20;24(14):11706. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411706.
8
Bleeding with intensive versus guideline antiplatelet therapy in acute cerebral ischaemia.急性脑缺血患者强化抗血小板治疗与指南推荐抗血小板治疗的出血比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 20;13(1):11717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38474-2.
9
Comparison of Cilostazol versus Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Ischemic Stroke who Underwent Intracranial or Extracranial Artery Stent Implantation.颅内或颅外动脉支架置入术后缺血性脑卒中患者加用西洛他唑与氯吡格雷的比较。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Aug 1;30(8):1010-1021. doi: 10.5551/jat.63632. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
10
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in the Management of Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack: An Expert Consensus Statement From Taiwan Stroke Society and Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine.双抗血小板治疗在急性轻度缺血性卒中及高危短暂性脑缺血发作管理中的应用:台湾卒中学会与台湾急诊医学会专家共识声明
J Acute Med. 2022 Sep 1;12(3):85-95. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202209_12(3).0001.

本文引用的文献

1
Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA.氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在急性缺血性卒中和高风险 TIA 中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):215-225. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800410. Epub 2018 May 16.
2
Response by Malhotra et al to the Letters Regarding Article, "Cerebrovascular Outcomes With Proton Pump Inhibitors and Thienopyridines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".马尔霍特拉等人对关于文章《质子泵抑制剂与噻吩并吡啶类药物的脑血管结局:系统评价与荟萃分析》的信件的回应
Stroke. 2018 Apr;49(4):e171-e172. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021082. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2018 急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
Cerebrovascular Outcomes With Proton Pump Inhibitors and Thienopyridines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.质子泵抑制剂和噻吩吡啶类药物与脑血管结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2018 Feb;49(2):312-318. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019166. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
5
Risk for Major Bleeding in Patients Receiving Ticagrelor Compared With Aspirin After Transient Ischemic Attack or Acute Ischemic Stroke in the SOCRATES Study (Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Treated With Aspirin or Ticagrelor and Patient Outcomes).SOCRATES 研究(阿司匹林或替格瑞洛治疗的急性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作以及患者结局)中,短暂性脑缺血发作或急性缺血性卒中患者接受替格瑞洛与阿司匹林治疗后的大出血风险
Circulation. 2017 Sep 5;136(10):907-916. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028566. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
6
Drug interaction: Clopidogrel and PPIs.药物相互作用:氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2017 Feb 27;59(1515):39-40.
7
Association Between CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Allele Status and Efficacy of Clopidogrel for Risk Reduction Among Patients With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.CYP2C19 失活等位基因状态与氯吡格雷降低小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者风险的疗效之间的关系。
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):70-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8662.
8
Ticagrelor versus Aspirin in Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.替卡格雷与阿司匹林用于急性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 7;375(1):35-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603060. Epub 2016 May 10.
9
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Prediction models for intracranial hemorrhage or major bleeding in patients on antiplatelet therapy: a systematic review and external validation study.抗血小板治疗患者颅内出血或大出血预测模型的系统评价和外部验证研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jan;14(1):167-74. doi: 10.1111/jth.13196. Epub 2016 Jan 4.