Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43219.
Gastrointestinal injury progression induced by antiplatelet therapy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been well studied.
To assess the association of aspirin, clopidogrel, and their combination with gastrointestinal injury progression among patients without high bleeding risk after PCI.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis assessed data from the Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Gastrointestinal Injury Evaluated by ANKON Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (OPT-PEACE) double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter randomized clinical trial. The OPT-PEACE trial was conducted at 28 centers in China, and recruitment took place from July 13, 2017, to July 13, 2019. The trial included patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation after PCI. Statistical analysis was conducted from September 13, 2022, to January 23, 2023.
Patients underwent magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) at baseline and after 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin (100 mg/d) plus clopidogrel (75 mg/d). Those with no evidence of gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding (ie, the intention-to-treat [ITT] cohort) were randomized (1:1:1) to aspirin (100 mg/d) plus matching placebo (aspirin alone), clopidogrel (75 mg/d) plus matching placebo (clopidogrel alone), or DAPT for an additional 6 months. A third MCE was performed 12 months after PCI.
The primary outcome was the rate of gastric injury progression as assessed with the results of the 3 MCEs (at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. The key secondary outcome was the rate of small-intestinal injury progression. Gastric or small-intestinal injury progression was defined as a quantitative increase in erosions or ulcers between the second and third MCEs (at 6 and 12 months, respectively).
This study included the 394 patients in the mITT cohort. Their mean (SD) age was 56.9 (8.7) years, and most were men (296 [75.1%]). A total of 132 patients were randomized to aspirin alone, 132 to clopidogrel alone, and 130 to DAPT. Gastric injury progression occurred in 49 aspirin users (37.1%), 64 clopidogrel users (48.5%), and 69 DAPT users (53.1%) (P = .02), reflecting a lower rate of gastric injury progression among aspirin users vs DAPT users (risk ratio [RR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.49-0.99]; P = .009). No significant difference was observed between clopidogrel alone and DAPT (48.5% vs 53.1%; P = .46) or between aspirin alone and clopidogrel alone (37.1% vs 48.5%; P = .06). A total of 51 aspirin users (38.6%), 65 clopidogrel users (49.2%), and 71 DAPT users (54.6%) (P = .03) developed progressive small-intestinal injury, reflecting a lower rate of small-intestinal injury among aspirin users vs DAPT users (RR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.50-0.99]; P = .01). No difference was observed between patients treated with clopidogrel vs DAPT (49.2% vs 54.6%; P = .38) or with aspirin vs clopidogrel (38.6% vs 49.2%; P = .08).
In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, ongoing use of aspirin, clopidogrel, or their combination between 6 and 12 months after PCI was associated with progressive gastric and small-intestinal injury in a substantial proportion of patients, more so with DAPT than with monotherapy. Clopidogrel was at least as likely as aspirin to induce gastrointestinal injury progression. Future research is warranted to determine what impact the findings from MCEs would have on decision-making of antiplatelet therapy.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03198741.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后抗血小板治疗引起的胃肠道损伤进展尚未得到充分研究。
评估阿司匹林、氯吡格雷及其联合用药与无高出血风险的 PCI 后患者胃肠道损伤进展的关系。
设计、设置和参与者:这项二次分析评估了来自 Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for Prevention of Gastrointestinal Injury Evaluated by ANKON Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy(OPT-PEACE)双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心随机临床试验的数据。OPT-PEACE 试验在中国 28 个中心进行,招募时间为 2017 年 7 月 13 日至 2019 年 7 月 13 日。该试验纳入了稳定型冠状动脉疾病或急性冠状动脉综合征患者,这些患者在 PCI 后没有 ST 段抬高。统计分析于 2023 年 1 月 23 日进行。
患者在接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)6 个月后(阿司匹林 100 mg/d 加氯吡格雷 75 mg/d)接受磁控胶囊内镜(MCE)检查。那些没有胃肠道溃疡或出血证据的患者(即意向治疗[ITT]队列)按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配(阿司匹林 100 mg/d 加匹配安慰剂[阿司匹林单药]、氯吡格雷 75 mg/d 加匹配安慰剂[氯吡格雷单药]或 DAPT 再治疗 6 个月)。在 PCI 后 12 个月进行第三次 MCE。
主要结局是经修改后的意向治疗(mITT)人群中 3 次 MCE(基线、6 个月和 12 个月)的胃损伤进展率。关键次要结局是小肠损伤进展率。胃或小肠损伤进展定义为第二次和第三次 MCE 之间(分别在 6 个月和 12 个月时)的侵蚀或溃疡定量增加。
这项研究纳入了 mITT 队列中的 394 名患者。他们的平均(SD)年龄为 56.9(8.7)岁,大多数是男性(296 [75.1%])。共有 132 名患者随机分配至阿司匹林单药组、132 名患者至氯吡格雷单药组、130 名患者至 DAPT 组。49 名阿司匹林使用者(37.1%)、64 名氯吡格雷使用者(48.5%)和 69 名 DAPT 使用者(53.1%)发生胃损伤进展(P = .02),这表明阿司匹林使用者与 DAPT 使用者相比,胃损伤进展发生率较低(风险比[RR],0.70 [95%CI,0.49-0.99];P = .009)。氯吡格雷单药与 DAPT(48.5% vs 53.1%;P = .46)或阿司匹林单药与氯吡格雷单药(37.1% vs 48.5%;P = .06)之间无显著差异。51 名阿司匹林使用者(38.6%)、65 名氯吡格雷使用者(49.2%)和 71 名 DAPT 使用者(54.6%)(P = .03)出现进展性小肠损伤,这表明阿司匹林使用者与 DAPT 使用者相比,小肠损伤进展发生率较低(RR,0.71 [95%CI,0.50-0.99];P = .01)。氯吡格雷与 DAPT(49.2% vs 54.6%;P = .38)或阿司匹林与氯吡格雷(38.6% vs 49.2%;P = .08)之间无差异。
在这项随机临床试验的二次分析中,在 PCI 后 6 至 12 个月期间持续使用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷或两者联合治疗与相当一部分患者的胃和小肠损伤进展相关,与 DAPT 相比,与单药治疗相关。氯吡格雷与阿司匹林一样,可能会引起胃肠道损伤进展。需要进一步研究以确定 MCE 结果对抗血小板治疗决策的影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03198741。