• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基层医疗环境中,整骨医学专业的学生能否使用手持式超声设备准确测量腹主动脉尺寸?

Can Osteopathic Medical Students Accurately Measure Abdominal Aortic Dimensions Using Handheld Ultrasonography Devices in the Primary Care Setting?

作者信息

Hower Kimberly, Young Clipper F, Wagner Alesia, Thorsen Dean, Dugan Joy

出版信息

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019 May 1;119(5):e19-e24. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2019.056.

DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2019.056
PMID:31034073
Abstract

CONTEXT

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends a 1-time ultrasonography (US) screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to reduce AAA-specific mortality in men aged 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked. A 2015 study concluded that less than 50% of at-risk primary care patients are screened for AAA. To increase screening rates, it would be beneficial to train other health care professionals in accurately measuring abdominal aortic dimensions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether osteopathic medical students can use handheld US machines to measure abdominal aortic diameters as accurately as an experienced US technologist.

METHODS

Three osteopathic medical students underwent 8 hours of US training with a board-certified radiologist to measure abdominal aortic dimensions using a handheld US device. After the training, students independently conducted AAA US screenings at a clinic on participants meeting USPSTF AAA screening criteria. Transverse and anteroposterior measurements were taken at 3 sites: celiac axis, inferior to the renal arteries, and superior to the iliac bifurcation. A US technologist then measured the participants' aortic diameters in the radiology department at another facility. The measurements from both reports were then compared using a 2-sample t test.

RESULTS

The aortic diameter was measured in 16 participants with a mean (SD) body mass index of 26.7 (3.6). The mean (SD) difference between novice and expert measurement of the abdominal aorta was -0.15 (0.23) cm. No statistically significant difference was found between the US measurements completed by students and a US technologist (t=-1.38, P=.09). None of the participants met the criteria for AAA (>3.0 cm), with the largest abdominal aorta scanned by experts measuring 2.86 cm.

CONCLUSION

When properly trained, osteopathic medical students can accurately measure abdominal aortic diameters using a handheld US device. Training more medical students in ultrasonography would offer increased screening opportunities and possibly reduce AAA-related mortality. Further studies are needed to assess the ability of osteopathic medical students to accurately measure AAAs, as no participants in this study met the criteria for AAA.

摘要

背景

美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议对65至75岁有吸烟史的男性进行一次腹部主动脉瘤(AAA)超声检查,以降低AAA特异性死亡率。2015年的一项研究得出结论,不到50%的高危初级保健患者接受了AAA筛查。为了提高筛查率,培训其他医疗保健专业人员准确测量腹主动脉尺寸将是有益的。

目的

确定整骨医学学生是否能像经验丰富的超声技师一样,使用手持式超声机器准确测量腹主动脉直径。

方法

三名整骨医学学生与一名获得委员会认证的放射科医生一起接受了8小时的超声培训,使用手持式超声设备测量腹主动脉尺寸。培训后,学生们在诊所对符合USPSTF AAA筛查标准的参与者独立进行AAA超声筛查。在三个部位进行横向和前后径测量:腹腔干、肾动脉下方和髂总动脉分叉上方。然后,一名超声技师在另一家机构的放射科测量参与者的主动脉直径。然后使用双样本t检验比较两份报告中的测量结果。

结果

对16名参与者进行了主动脉直径测量,平均(标准差)体重指数为26.7(3.6)。新手与专家对腹主动脉测量的平均(标准差)差异为-0.15(0.23)cm。学生完成的超声测量与超声技师的测量之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(t=-1.38,P=0.09)。没有参与者符合AAA标准(>3.0 cm),专家扫描的最大腹主动脉为2.86 cm。

结论

经过适当培训后,整骨医学学生可以使用手持式超声设备准确测量腹主动脉直径。培训更多医学生进行超声检查将提供更多的筛查机会,并可能降低与AAA相关的死亡率。由于本研究中没有参与者符合AAA标准,因此需要进一步研究来评估整骨医学学生准确测量AAA的能力。

相似文献

1
Can Osteopathic Medical Students Accurately Measure Abdominal Aortic Dimensions Using Handheld Ultrasonography Devices in the Primary Care Setting?在基层医疗环境中,整骨医学专业的学生能否使用手持式超声设备准确测量腹主动脉尺寸?
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019 May 1;119(5):e19-e24. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2019.056.
2
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.筛查腹主动脉瘤:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2211-2218. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18928.
3
Novices may be trained to screen for abdominal aortic aneurysms using ultrasound.新手可以接受培训,使用超声波筛查腹主动脉瘤。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013 Nov 22;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-11-42.
4
Lumbar Spine MRI: Missed Opportunities for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection.腰椎磁共振成像:腹部主动脉瘤检测的漏诊机会。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020 Jul-Aug;49(4):254-259. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
The 10-year outcomes of a regional abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program.区域性腹主动脉瘤筛查项目的 10 年结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.053. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.对 65 岁或以上的女性进行腹主动脉瘤筛查:建模研究和健康经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(43):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta22430.
7
Point-of-Care Ultrasound Performed by a Medical Student Compared to Physical Examination by Vascular Surgeons in the Detection of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.医学生进行的床旁超声检查与血管外科医生体格检查在腹主动脉瘤检测中的比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;52:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
Reliability of the measurement of the abdominal aortic diameter by novice operators using a pocket-sized ultrasound system.使用口袋式超声系统的新手操作者测量腹主动脉直径的可靠性。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Dec;106(12):644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
9
Ultrasonography screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.超声筛查腹部主动脉瘤:美国预防服务工作组的系统证据回顾。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):321-9. doi: 10.7326/M13-1844.
10
Routine screening for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients is not recommended in emergency departments that are frequently crowded.不建议在经常拥挤的急诊科对高危患者进行无症状腹主动脉瘤的常规筛查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1242-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00502.x.