Suppr超能文献

新手可以接受培训,使用超声波筛查腹主动脉瘤。

Novices may be trained to screen for abdominal aortic aneurysms using ultrasound.

作者信息

Nguyen Anh T V, Hill Geraldine B, Versteeg Matthew P T, Thomson Ian A, van Rij Andre M

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013 Nov 22;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-11-42.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Highly trained vascular sonographers make up a significant cost of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) ultrasound screening. However, they are over-trained for this very limited task. Others have reported that health workers (e.g. emergency room staff and nurses) with far less training may be able to perform these scans. The national AAA screening programme in the UK uses staff with limited training. Whether individuals without a health professional qualification could be trained to perform the scan accurately to improve cost-effectiveness is not known. We aimed to investigate whether a short, well-supervised course in ultrasonography could train novices to detect AAA for screening purposes.

METHODS

Three novices were trained by an experienced sonographer for 15 days to perform abdominal aortic ultrasound examinations and detect AAA using a portable ultrasound system. The examination included four anterior-posterior aortic measurements: a maximal diameter in the coronal plane and three diameters of the suprarenal, mid and distal infrarenal aorta in the transverse plane. The novices independently scanned 215 subjects following training; experienced sonographers repeated the measurements on the same subject in the same session. Using Bland-Altman plots and CUSUM analysis, the novices' and experienced sonographers' accuracy and efficiency measurements were compared. Factors influencing performance were recorded.

RESULTS

The novices measured the maximal coronal aortic diameter accurately, to within 0.46-0.52 cm of the true diameter; 85-97% of their coronal measurements were within 0.5 cm of the assessors; kappa statistic and Bland-Altman plots show a high agreement with the assessor's measurements. However, the novices' measurements of the three diameters in the transverse plane were outside clinically acceptable limits. Assuming a referral policy for a second scan for scans recorded as 'difficult', only one novice missed a 3.13 cm aneurysm.A CUSUM quality improvement analysis demonstrated substantial improvements in the scanning efficiency of the novices with continued scanning experience.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that novices could be trained to screen for AAA over 15 days. However, the need for continuing quality improvement is critical, especially in more technically demanding cases. Measuring the maximal infrarenal diameter instead of specific segmental diameters may be more appropriate for AAA screening using novices.

摘要

背景

训练有素的血管超声检查人员构成了腹主动脉瘤(AAA)超声筛查的一项重大成本。然而,对于这项非常有限的任务,他们存在过度培训的情况。其他人报告称,训练少得多的卫生工作者(如急诊室工作人员和护士)可能能够进行这些扫描。英国的全国AAA筛查计划使用的是训练有限的工作人员。没有卫生专业资格的个人是否能够被训练准确地进行扫描以提高成本效益尚不清楚。我们旨在调查一个简短且有良好监督的超声检查课程是否能训练新手为筛查目的检测AAA。

方法

三名新手由一位经验丰富的超声检查人员培训15天,以使用便携式超声系统进行腹主动脉超声检查并检测AAA。检查包括四个前后方向的主动脉测量:冠状面的最大直径以及横切面上肾上腺水平、肾中水平和肾下远端主动脉的三个直径。新手在训练后独立扫描了215名受试者;经验丰富的超声检查人员在同一时段对同一受试者重复进行测量。使用布兰德 - 奥特曼图和累积和分析,比较了新手和经验丰富的超声检查人员的准确性和效率测量结果。记录影响操作表现的因素。

结果

新手准确测量了冠状面主动脉的最大直径,与真实直径相差在0.46 - 0.52厘米以内;他们冠状面测量结果的85 - 97%与评估者的测量结果相差在0.5厘米以内;kappa统计量和布兰德 - 奥特曼图显示与评估者的测量结果高度一致。然而,新手对横切面上三个直径的测量超出了临床可接受范围。假设对于记录为“困难”的扫描采用二次扫描的转诊政策,只有一名新手漏诊了一个3.13厘米的动脉瘤。累积和质量改进分析表明,随着持续的扫描经验,新手的扫描效率有了显著提高。

结论

这项研究表明新手可以在15天内接受训练以筛查AAA。然而,持续质量改进的需求至关重要,尤其是在技术要求更高的情况下。对于使用新手进行AAA筛查,测量肾下最大直径而非特定节段直径可能更合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ccf/3874661/5271e87ce734/1476-7120-11-42-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验