• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机光学印模在颌骨切除缺损中的精度和准确性:一项体外 3D 比较。

Precision and Trueness of Computerized Optical Impressions in Maxillectomy Defects: An In Vitro 3D Comparison.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2019 May/Jun;32(3):289-292. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6077.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.6077
PMID:31034547
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the precision and trueness of computerized optical impressions of maxillectomy defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three different maxillectomy defect models based on the Aramany classification system were used. Reference digitization of the models was performed with an industrial computerized tomography scanner. Each model was scanned five times using an intraoral scanner (True Definition). With the use of 3D evaluation software, the 3D datasets were geometrically superimposed using a best-fit algorithm to evaluate precision and trueness. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences between the scans.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference in both precision and trueness between Aramany classes (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Digitizing maxillectomy defect models with an intraoral scanner appears to be accurate and reliable.

摘要

目的

评估上颌骨切除术缺陷的计算机光学印模的精度和准确性。

材料和方法

使用基于 Aramany 分类系统的三种不同的上颌骨切除术缺陷模型。使用工业计算机断层扫描 (CT) 扫描仪对模型进行参考数字化。使用口腔内扫描仪 (True Definition) 对每个模型进行五次扫描。使用 3D 评估软件,通过最佳拟合算法对 3D 数据集进行几何叠加,以评估精度和准确性。对扫描结果进行统计学分析,以确定 Aramany 分类之间的差异。

结果

在精度和准确性方面,Aramany 分类之间存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。

结论

使用口腔内扫描仪对上颌骨切除术缺陷模型进行数字化似乎是准确和可靠的。

相似文献

1
Precision and Trueness of Computerized Optical Impressions in Maxillectomy Defects: An In Vitro 3D Comparison.计算机光学印模在颌骨切除缺损中的精度和准确性:一项体外 3D 比较。
Int J Prosthodont. 2019 May/Jun;32(3):289-292. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6077.
2
Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance.口腔内光学印模的准确性评估:使用参照器具的临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):400-405. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.022. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Feasibility and Accuracy of Digitizing Edentulous Maxillectomy Defects: A Comparative Study.数字化无牙上颌骨切除缺损的可行性与准确性:一项对比研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Mar/Apr;30(2):147-149. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5095.
4
Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.全牙弓口腔印模的准确性:一种测量准确性和精密度的新方法。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1.
5
Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.不同头部尺寸的口内扫描仪在部分无牙颌下颌中获取的数字印模的准确性和精确性。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jul;62(3):347-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
6
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.四种口腔内扫描仪在口腔种植学中的准确性:一项体外比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4.
7
Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.全上颌(包括完整牙列和腭部软组织)口内数字化印模的准确性
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158800. eCollection 2016.
8
Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study.5 种口内扫描仪在单颗和多颗种植体印模中的准确性和精确性:一项比较性的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7.
9
Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows.比较数字化和传统工作流程制作的固定义齿模型的准确性(准确性和精密度)。
J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Jan;63(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
10
Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.与间接数字化相比,五种口腔内扫描仪的准确性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1445-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Digital Technology in Prosthetic Treatment for a Cleft Lip and Palate Patient: A Novel Dental Technique.数字技术在唇腭裂患者修复治疗中的应用:一种新型牙科技术。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 4;17(7):e87298. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87298. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A pilot study comparing conventional and digital impression techniques for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with an obturator.一项试点研究,比较在使用闭孔器修复的上颌骨切除患者中,使用印地语元音进行语音分析的传统印模技术和数字印模技术。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025 Jul 1;25(3):266-275. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_64_25. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
3
The Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners in Maxillary Defects with Different Model Variations.
不同模型变体对上颌骨缺损进行口内扫描的准确性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 24;14(21):2368. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212368.
4
Digital workflow feasibility for the fabrication of intraoral maxillofacial prosthetics after surgical resection: a systematic literature review.数字化工作流程在手术切除后制作口腔颌面赝复体中的可行性:系统文献回顾。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 Jun 19;83:392-403. doi: 10.2340/aos.v83.40870.
5
Accuracy of intraoral scanning versus conventional impressions for partial edentulous patients with maxillary defects.上颌骨缺损的部分无牙颌患者的口腔内扫描与传统印模的准确性比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):16773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44033-6.