Aragno Anna
Distinguished Scholar in Residence, Washington Square Institute, New York.
Biosystems. 2019 Aug;182:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
Exploring continuity from organic codes and natural signals to cultural sign and symbol systems, this paper is undergirded conceptually by a semiotic tree depicting an ascending hierarchy of semiotic forms. Originating in underground roots from a medley of organic codes, the human use of codified meanings surfaces in the trunk, (in Latin Caudex or Codex), our simplest semiotic instrument. Ascending branches represent natural and man-made signals, and indicative and denotative signs, rising to more complex fully symbolic abstract forms in various sign systems. Each level corresponds to a different mental organization, determining the quality and nature of subjective experience and knowledge, epistemology and information being closely tied to semiotic and semantic factors. The psychoanalytic method focuses on unconscious phenomena descending interpretively below the limen of linguistic consciousness generating a semantic field that exposes multiple levels and kinds of meanings. This positions us optimally to observe different semiotic organizations, a multi-coded spectrum of human enacted and mediated meanings that is best systemized along developmental lines (Aragno, 1997/,2016). Freud's decoding the grammar of dreams enables the linguistic interpretation of condensed and displaced pictographic representations of a deeply unconscious 'Primary Process' semantic bridging biological and psychological processes that are ongoing throughout life. A multilayered model of mind reframes theoretical understanding around epigenetic and morphological principles that are applicable to phylogenetic and ontogenetic development. From this revised meta-theoretical base, this paper illustrates how language absorbs and often serves deep unconscious functions, as well as, conversely, elevating abstract cognition and conscious articulation. A bio-semiotic multiple-code model of mind is based on progressive stages in the development of symbolization, a cerebral faculty unique to our species, distinguishing us from all other animals, without which we could neither speak nor conceive of "Mind" at all. Conscious 'mind' emerges through a signifying act, assigning a name to a 'person' or 'thing' that can be represented within, in its absence. This simple concept has far reaching cognitive/psychological consequences impacting on all aspects of experience and knowledge.
本文探讨了从有机编码和自然信号到文化符号及符号系统的连续性,其概念基础是一棵符号学之树,描绘了符号形式的上升层次结构。人类对编码意义的运用起源于地下根系中形形色色的有机编码,在树干部分(拉丁语为Caudex或Codex)显现出来,这是我们最简单的符号工具。向上的树枝代表自然和人造信号、指示性和外延性符号,上升到各种符号系统中更复杂的完全象征性抽象形式。每个层次对应不同的心理组织,决定主观体验和知识的质量与本质,认识论和信息与符号学及语义因素紧密相连。精神分析方法关注潜意识现象,通过解释性地深入到语言意识阈限以下,生成一个揭示多层次和多种意义的语义场。这使我们能够最佳地观察不同的符号组织,即人类制定和中介意义的多编码光谱,最好沿着发展脉络进行系统化(阿拉尼奥,1997/,2016)。弗洛伊德对梦的语法进行解码,使得对深度潜意识的“原初过程”中浓缩和移位的象形表征进行语言解释成为可能,这种语义连接了贯穿一生的生物和心理过程。一个多层次的心智模型围绕表观遗传和形态学原理重新构建理论理解,这些原理适用于种系发生和个体发生发展。基于这个修订后的元理论基础,本文阐述了语言如何吸收并常常服务于深度潜意识功能,反之,又如何提升抽象认知和意识表达。一种生物符号学的多编码心智模型基于符号化发展的渐进阶段,符号化是我们人类特有的大脑能力,使我们有别于所有其他动物,没有它我们根本无法说话或构想“心智”。有意识的“心智”通过一个意指行为出现,为一个可以在其不在场时在内部被表征的“人”或“事物”赋予一个名称。这个简单的概念具有深远的认知/心理后果,影响着经验和知识的各个方面。