Early improvement in HAMD-17 and HAMD-7 scores predict response and remission in depressed patients treated with fluoxetine or electroconvulsive therapy.

BACKGROUND

Compared to the 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17), the 7-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-7) would be more practical for use in busy clinical settings. Herein, we aim to evaluate (1) whether the HAMD-7 is a reliable and valid measure that is sensitive to changes in depressive symptoms, and (2) whether early improvement of depressive symptoms, as measured by the HAMD-7, is capable of predicting response and remission in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) during acute treatment with fluoxetine or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

METHODS

This is a post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials in MDD. Internal consistency, validity, and sensitivity-to-change of the HAMD-17 and HAMD-7 were compared during acute treatment and at 3-month follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to evaluate the discriminative capacity of the HAMD-17 and HAMD-7.

RESULTS

The HAMD-7 is a reliable and valid measure that is sensitive to changes in depressive symptoms. Early improvement, as measured by either the HAMD-17 or HAMD-7, was capable of predicting response and remission to acute treatment with fluoxetine or ECT with good discriminative capacity.

LIMITATIONS

This is a post-hoc analysis of two open-label clinical trials with limited sample sizes. All patients were Taiwanese, which limits the generalizability of our results.

CONCLUSIONS

HAMD-7 is a clinically useful measure that is capable of detecting early improvement of depressive symptoms. The HAMD-7 may have the potential to inform clinical assessment as part of measurement-based care.