• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前健康相关生活质量可预测肝细胞癌手术切除后的最小临床重要差异和生存率。

Preoperative Health-Related Quality of Life Predicts Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Survival after Surgical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

作者信息

Chiu Chong-Chi, Lee King-Teh, Wang Jhi-Joung, Sun Ding-Ping, Lee Hao-Hsien, Huang Chien-Cheng, Shi Hon-Yi

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying 73657, Taiwan.

Department of General Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 27;8(5):576. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050576.

DOI:10.3390/jcm8050576
PMID:31035539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6572462/
Abstract

Despite the growing use of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as a cancer outcome measure, no study has reported clinically significant outcomes in cancer patients. We defined MCID and evaluated the use of preoperative HRQoL for predicting MCID and survival after surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In total, 369 patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) and the SF-36 at baseline and at two years post-operative at three tertiary academic hospitals. The corresponding MCID values were 3.6 (SF-36 physical component summary), 4.2 (SF-36 mental component summary), 5.4 (FACT-General total score), and 6.7 (FACT-Hep total score). The predictors of achieving postoperative MCID were significantly higher in patients who had low preoperative HRQoL score, advanced age, high education level, and high BMI ( < 0.05). However, patients with a high preoperative HRQoL score, high education level, high BMI, and low Charlson comorbidity index score were significantly associated with survival ( < 0.05). Preoperative HRQoL scores were predictive of MCID and overall survival after surgical resection of HCC. The findings of this study may be useful for managing the preoperative expectations of candidates for HCC resection and for developing shared decision-making procedures for patients undergoing surgical resection of HCC.

摘要

尽管最小临床重要差异(MCID)作为癌症结局指标的应用越来越广泛,但尚无研究报告癌症患者的临床显著结局。我们定义了MCID,并评估了术前健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)对预测肝细胞癌(HCC)手术切除后的MCID和生存情况的作用。在三家三级学术医院中,共有369例患者在基线时以及术后两年完成了癌症治疗-肝胆功能评估(FACT-Hep)和SF-36量表。相应的MCID值分别为3.6(SF-36身体成分总结)、4.2(SF-36心理成分总结)、5.4(FACT-通用总分)和6.7(FACT-Hep总分)。术前HRQoL得分低、年龄大、教育水平高和体重指数(BMI)高的患者实现术后MCID的预测因素显著更高(P<0.05)。然而,术前HRQoL得分高、教育水平高、BMI高和Charlson合并症指数得分低的患者与生存显著相关(P<0.05)。术前HRQoL得分可预测HCC手术切除后的MCID和总体生存情况。本研究结果可能有助于管理HCC切除候选者的术前期望,并为接受HCC手术切除的患者制定共同决策程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/6572462/8739208bdf66/jcm-08-00576-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/6572462/8739208bdf66/jcm-08-00576-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/6572462/8739208bdf66/jcm-08-00576-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Preoperative Health-Related Quality of Life Predicts Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Survival after Surgical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.术前健康相关生活质量可预测肝细胞癌手术切除后的最小临床重要差异和生存率。
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 27;8(5):576. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050576.
2
Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.术前简短健康调查评分可预测前交叉韧带重建术后至少2年随访时的重返运动情况及最小临床重要差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2784-2790. doi: 10.1177/0363546517714472. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.哪些术前因素与 THA 后未达到最小临床重要差异有关?一项国际多中心研究的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1301-1312. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000667.
4
Health-Related Quality of Life before and after Surgical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study.肝细胞癌手术切除前后的健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jan 27;19(1):65-72. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.1.65.
5
Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients.成人胸腰椎畸形患者术前颈椎矢状面畸形与2年随访时较差预后的相关性:182例患者分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):108-15. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141098. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
6
Impact of preoperative depression on 2-year clinical outcomes following adult spinal deformity surgery: the importance of risk stratification based on type of psychological distress.术前抑郁对成人脊柱畸形手术后2年临床结局的影响:基于心理困扰类型进行风险分层的重要性。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Oct;25(4):477-485. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE15980. Epub 2016 May 6.
7
The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.三柱截骨术后2年达到最小临床重要差异和显著临床获益的可能性:140例患者的分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):340-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE141031. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Outcome After Arthroscopic Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery.机器学习在预测关节镜下股骨髋臼撞击症手术后具有临床意义的结果中的应用。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):415-423. doi: 10.1177/0363546519892905. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?基于潜在类别分析的成人脊柱畸形健康相关生活质量量表的最小临床重要差异:是否可以对手术和非手术患者使用相同的数值?
Spine J. 2019 Jan;19(1):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
10
Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Success in Foot and Ankle Patients.术前PROMIS评分可预测足踝部患者术后疗效。
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Sep;37(9):911-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100716665113. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Health-Related Quality of Life in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Key Methodologies for Assessing Patient Reported Outcomes and Intervention Targets.改善肝细胞癌患者与健康相关的生活质量:评估患者报告结局和干预靶点的关键方法
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2025 Mar 5;12:497-511. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S347929. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of new multimorbidity-weighted index for ICD-10-coded electronic health record and claims data: an observational study.开发和验证新的基于 ICD-10 编码的电子健康记录和索赔数据的多病种加权指数:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e074390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074390.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Health-Related Quality of Life in Chronic Liver Diseases: A Strong Impact of Hand Grip Strength.慢性肝病患者的健康相关生活质量:握力的显著影响。
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 15;7(12):553. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120553.
2
Health-Related Quality of Life before and after Surgical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study.肝细胞癌手术切除前后的健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jan 27;19(1):65-72. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.1.65.
3
The role of liver resection in the management of intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. A systematic review.
Impact of Hepatic Pedicle Clamping on Long-Term Survival Following Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Stratified Analysis Based on Intraoperative Blood Transfusion Status.
肝蒂阻断对肝癌肝切除术后长期生存的影响:基于术中输血状态的分层分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1812-1822. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14642-6. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
4
The impact of early palliative care on the quality of life of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: The IMPERATIVE case-crossover study.早期姑息治疗对晚期胰腺癌患者生活质量的影响:IMPERATIVE 病例交叉研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Apr 6;31(4):250. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07709-3.
5
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting in 5-Year Quality-of-Life Comparison among Three Surgical Procedures for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌三种手术方法5年生活质量比较中的治疗权重逆概率法
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;15(1):252. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010252.
6
Quantitative preoperative patient assessments are related to survival and procedure outcome for osseous metastases.术前对骨转移患者进行定量评估与生存率及手术结果相关。
J Bone Oncol. 2022 May 13;34:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100433. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Breast Cancer Surgery 10-Year Survival Prediction by Machine Learning: A Large Prospective Cohort Study.基于机器学习的乳腺癌手术10年生存率预测:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Dec 29;11(1):47. doi: 10.3390/biology11010047.
8
Patient-reported outcomes in HCC: A scoping review by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.肝癌患者报告结局:美国肝病研究学会实践指标委员会的范围综述。
Hepatology. 2022 Jul;76(1):251-274. doi: 10.1002/hep.32313. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
9
Special Issue on Clinical Medicine for Healthcare and Sustainability.医疗保健与可持续发展临床医学特刊。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 13;9(7):2206. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072206.
10
Elevated systemic inflammatory responses, factors associated with physical and mental quality of life, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.升高的全身炎症反应、与身心生活质量相关的因素和肝细胞癌的预后。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Mar 7;12(5):4357-4370. doi: 10.18632/aging.102889.
肝切除术在中晚期肝细胞癌治疗中的作用。系统评价。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb;44(2):195-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
4
An Evaluation of Ischaemic Preconditioning as a Method of Reducing Ischaemia Reperfusion Injury in Liver Surgery and Transplantation.缺血预处理作为减少肝脏手术和移植中缺血再灌注损伤方法的评估
J Clin Med. 2017 Jul 14;6(7):69. doi: 10.3390/jcm6070069.
5
Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review.用于推断健康相关生活质量变化的最小重要差异——一项系统评价
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
6
Highlights of Recent Findings on Quality-of-Life Management for Patients With Cancer and Their Survivors.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;2(11):1401-1402. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3620.
7
Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection.计划性肝切除术前康复治疗的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):504-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10096. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
A Review and Update of Treatment Options and Controversies in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌治疗选择与管理争议的综述及更新
Ann Surg. 2016 Jun;263(6):1112-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001556.
9
Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: A conceptual or an empirical distinction?生活质量的反思性、因果性和复合指标:概念性区分还是实证性区分?
Qual Life Res. 2015 Sep;24(9):2057-65. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0954-2. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
10
Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients.最小临床重要差异:界定对患者真正重要的内容。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1342-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13128.