• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎双能X线吸收法扫描中个体及联合椎体构型的骨密度精度

Bone Mineral Density Precision for Individual and Combined Vertebrae Configurations From Lumbar Spine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scans.

作者信息

Hind Karen, Oldroyd Brian

机构信息

Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences and the Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.

School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2020 Oct-Dec;23(4):673-677. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2019.04.001
PMID:31036447
Abstract

The accurate interpretation of repeat DXA scan measurements and the understanding of what constitutes a true and meaningful change require knowledge of measurement error (precision) and least significant change. The interpretation of lumbar spine bone mineral density in particular can be confounded by artefacts and as such, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recommends exclusion of individual vertebrae if they are affected by local structural change or an artefact. The aim of this study was to determine the precision of bone mineral density measures of individual and various configurations of vertebrae from PA lumbar spine scans. The study group comprised of 30 women (age 36.3 ± 6.5 years; height: 165.2 ± 5.7 cm; weight: 67.7 ± 12.6 kg) who each received 2 consecutive anterior-posterior lumbar spine scans (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI), with repositioning. Precision errors varied by individual vertebrae and by different configurations of vertebrae but all were within the ISCD acceptable range of precision. For vertebrae configurations containing at least 2 vertebrae, precision error ranged from 0.005 to 0.008 RMS-SD (0.44%-0.70% CV). Of the individual vertebrae, the lowest precision error was observed at L4, and from the different configurations, for L2L3L4 and L1L2L3L4. In conclusion, this study group demonstrated excellent precision for BMD measurements of individual and various configurations of L1-L4 vertebrae using the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer.

摘要

对重复双能X线吸收法(DXA)扫描测量结果的准确解读以及对何为真实且有意义变化的理解,需要了解测量误差(精密度)和最小有意义变化。特别是腰椎骨密度的解读可能会受到伪影的干扰,因此,国际临床骨密度测量学会(ISCD)建议,如果单个椎体受到局部结构变化或伪影的影响,应将其排除。本研究的目的是确定来自腰椎前后位扫描的单个椎体及不同椎体组合的骨密度测量的精密度。研究组由30名女性组成(年龄36.3±6.5岁;身高:165.2±5.7厘米;体重:67.7±12.6千克),她们每人接受了2次连续的腰椎前后位扫描(Lunar iDXA,GE医疗集团,威斯康星州麦迪逊),且重新进行了定位。精密度误差因单个椎体和椎体的不同组合而异,但均在ISCD可接受的精密度范围内。对于包含至少2个椎体的椎体组合,精密度误差范围为0.005至0.008 RMS-SD(变异系数0.44%-0.70%)。在单个椎体中,L4的精密度误差最低,在不同组合中,L2L3L4和L1L2L3L4的精密度误差最低。总之,本研究组使用GE Lunar iDXA骨密度仪对L1-L4椎体的单个及不同组合进行骨密度测量时,显示出了出色的精密度。

相似文献

1
Bone Mineral Density Precision for Individual and Combined Vertebrae Configurations From Lumbar Spine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scans.腰椎双能X线吸收法扫描中个体及联合椎体构型的骨密度精度
J Clin Densitom. 2020 Oct-Dec;23(4):673-677. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients.在严重肥胖患者中,GE 公司 Lunar iDXA 对腰椎、全髋、股骨颈和全身骨密度评估的体内精度。
J Clin Densitom. 2014 Jan-Mar;17(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
3
In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total-body, lumbar spine, and femoral bone mineral density in adults.GE Lunar iDXA 骨密度仪在成人全身体、腰椎和股骨骨密度测量中的体内精度。
J Clin Densitom. 2010 Oct-Dec;13(4):413-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
4
Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.骨密度仪(Prodigy)与德尔福(Delphi)脊柱和股骨扫描的骨密度测量精度比较。
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(9):1303-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0127-9. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
5
BMD measurement and precision: a comparison of GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA densitometers.骨密度测量和精度:GE 公司 Lunar Prodigy 与 iDXA 骨密度仪的比较。
J Clin Densitom. 2012 Jan-Mar;15(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
6
Spine Trabecular Bone Score Precision, a Comparison Between GE Lunar Standard and High-Resolution Densitometers.脊柱小梁骨评分的精准度:GE Lunar标准骨密度仪与高分辨率骨密度仪的比较
J Clin Densitom. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
7
Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?定量计算机断层扫描测量的区域骨密度差异:临床常用的 L1-L2 平均值与整个腰骶部脊柱相关吗?
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
8
Cross-Calibration of Prodigy and Horizon A Densitometers and Precision of the Horizon A Densitometer.Prodigy 和 Horizon A 密度计的交叉校准和 Horizon A 密度计的精度。
J Clin Densitom. 2021 Jul-Sep;24(3):474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
9
A Cross-Calibration Study of GE Lunar iDXA and GE Lunar DPX Pro for Body Composition Measurements in Children and Adults.GE 医疗 Lunar iDXA 与 DPX Pro 骨密度仪在儿童和成人身体成分测量中的交叉校准研究
J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jan-Mar;23(1):128-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
10
Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.双能X线吸收测定法:一种新型锥形束系统的临床评估
Calcif Tissue Int. 2005 Feb;76(2):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s00223-004-0080-6. Epub 2005 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Fragility Score: a REMS-based indicator for the prediction of incident fragility fractures at 5 years.脆性评分:基于风险管理计划的指标,用于预测 5 年内的脆性骨折事件。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Apr;35(4):763-773. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02358-2. Epub 2023 Feb 8.