Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, 3600 Market Street 7th Floor Suite, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
J Urban Health. 2019 Aug;96(4):570-582. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00357-1.
Efforts to increase physical activity have traditionally included either individual-level interventions (e.g., educational campaigns) or neighborhood-level interventions (e.g., additional recreational facilities). Little work has addressed the interaction between spatial proximity and individual characteristics related to facility use. We aimed to better understand the synergistic impact of both physical activity environments and recreational facility membership on objectively measured physical activity. Using the New York City Physical Activity and Transit (PAT) survey (n = 644), we evaluated associations between counts of commercial physical activity facilities within 1 km of participants' home addresses with both facility membership and accelerometry-measured physical activity. Individuals living near more facilities were more likely to report membership (adjusted odds ratio for top versus bottom quartile of facility count: 3.77 (95% CI 1.54-9.20). Additionally, while amount of facilities within a neighborhood was associated with more physical activity, this association was stronger for individuals reporting gym membership. Interventions aiming to increase physical activity should consider both neighborhood amenities and potential barriers, including the financial and social barriers of membership. Evaluation of neighborhood opportunities must expand beyond physical presence to consider multiple dimensions of accessibility.
传统上,增加身体活动的努力包括个体层面的干预措施(例如,教育运动)或社区层面的干预措施(例如,增加娱乐设施)。很少有工作涉及空间接近度与与设施使用相关的个体特征之间的相互作用。我们旨在更好地理解身体活动环境和娱乐设施会员资格对客观测量的身体活动的协同影响。使用纽约市身体活动和交通(PAT)调查(n=644),我们评估了参与者家庭住址附近 1 公里范围内商业身体活动设施的数量与设施会员资格和加速度计测量的身体活动之间的关联。居住在设施附近的人更有可能报告会员资格(设施数量排名最高与最低四分之一的调整后优势比:3.77(95%置信区间 1.54-9.20))。此外,虽然社区内设施的数量与更多的身体活动有关,但对于报告健身房会员资格的人来说,这种关联更强。旨在增加身体活动的干预措施应考虑社区设施和潜在障碍,包括会员资格的经济和社会障碍。对社区机会的评估必须超越物理存在,考虑可及性的多个维度。