• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硝苯地平、卡托普利、酚苄明、前列环素和吲哚美辛对环孢素A诱导的大鼠肾功能损害的拮抗能力。

Antagonist capacities of nifedipine, captopril, phenoxybenzamine, prostacyclin and indomethacin on cyclosporin A induced impairment of rat renal function.

作者信息

Dieperink H, Leyssac P P, Starklint H, Jørgensen K A, Kemp E

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 1986 Dec;16(6):540-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1986.tb02175.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2362.1986.tb02175.x
PMID:3104056
Abstract

Experimental evidence indicates that cyclosporin A (CyA) nephrotoxicity is due to renal arteriolar constriction, reducing renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and delivery of tubular fluid from the end of the proximal tubule to the loop of Henle. The proximal tubular fractional reabsorption (PFR) is increased. Therefore, the impact on renal function of vasodilating agents was studied in rats given CyA. Conscious catheterized rats and clearance techniques were used. In acute experiments a preexisting CyA-nephrotoxicity was resistant to infusion of phenoxybenzamine, prostacyclin, captopril, nifedipine and indomethacin. Concomitant treatment with captopril and CyA did not improve renal function, while concomitant treatment with CyA and nifedipine improved GFR to 1.13 +/- 0.34 ml min-1 g-1 kidney weight (gKW) (n = 19, P less than 0.05), as compared to CyA and placebo treated controls (n = 12, 0.83 +/- 0.32 ml min-1 g-1 KW). Nifedipine also reduced FPR (88.6 +/- 5.1% vs. 83.2 +/- 5.6%. P less than 0.01), and increased lithium clearance from 99 +/- 54 to 184 +/- 64 microliters min-1 g-1 KW (P less than 0.001). The results are further evidence that CyA nephrotoxicity includes renal vasoconstriction, and indicates that calcium entry blockade is nephroprotective in the case of CyA toxicity.

摘要

实验证据表明,环孢素A(CyA)肾毒性是由于肾小动脉收缩,导致肾血流量、肾小球滤过率(GFR)以及从近端小管末端到髓袢的肾小管液输送减少。近端小管分数重吸收(PFR)增加。因此,在给予CyA的大鼠中研究了血管扩张剂对肾功能的影响。使用清醒插管大鼠和清除技术。在急性实验中,预先存在的CyA肾毒性对苯氧苄胺、前列环素、卡托普利、硝苯地平和吲哚美辛的输注具有抗性。卡托普利与CyA联合治疗并未改善肾功能,而CyA与硝苯地平联合治疗可使GFR提高至1.13±0.34 ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹肾重(gKW)(n = 19,P<0.05),相比之下,CyA与安慰剂治疗的对照组(n = 12,0.83±0.32 ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹ KW)。硝苯地平还降低了FPR(88.6±5.1%对83.2±5.6%,P<0.01),并使锂清除率从99±54提高到184±64 μl·min⁻¹·g⁻¹ KW(P<0.001)。这些结果进一步证明CyA肾毒性包括肾血管收缩,并表明钙内流阻滞在CyA毒性情况下具有肾保护作用。

相似文献

1
Antagonist capacities of nifedipine, captopril, phenoxybenzamine, prostacyclin and indomethacin on cyclosporin A induced impairment of rat renal function.硝苯地平、卡托普利、酚苄明、前列环素和吲哚美辛对环孢素A诱导的大鼠肾功能损害的拮抗能力。
Eur J Clin Invest. 1986 Dec;16(6):540-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1986.tb02175.x.
2
Nephrotoxicity of cyclosporin A. A lithium clearance and micropuncture study in rats.环孢素A的肾毒性。大鼠锂清除率及微穿刺研究。
Eur J Clin Invest. 1986 Feb;16(1):69-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1986.tb01310.x.
3
Nephrotoxicity of cyclosporin A in humans: effects on glomerular filtration and tubular reabsorption rates.环孢素A对人体的肾毒性:对肾小球滤过率和肾小管重吸收率的影响。
Eur J Clin Invest. 1987 Dec;17(6):493-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1987.tb01147.x.
4
Thromboxane receptor blockade improves cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in rats.血栓素受体阻断可改善大鼠的环孢素肾毒性。
Prostaglandins. 1990 Feb;39(2):135-46. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(90)90070-c.
5
Ketoconazole and cyclosporine A: combined effects on rat renal function and on serum and tissue cyclosporine A concentration.酮康唑与环孢素A:对大鼠肾功能以及血清和组织中环孢素A浓度的联合影响。
Clin Nephrol. 1986;25 Suppl 1:S137-43.
6
Cyclosporin reduces renal blood flow through vasoconstriction of arcuate arteries in the hydronephrotic rat model.在肾积水大鼠模型中,环孢素通过弓状动脉血管收缩减少肾血流量。
Klin Wochenschr. 1990 Feb 1;68(3):166-74. doi: 10.1007/BF01649080.
7
Effects of cyclosporin A, gentamicin and furosemide on rat renal function: a lithium clearance study.环孢素A、庆大霉素和呋塞米对大鼠肾功能的影响:锂清除率研究
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1987 Nov-Dec;14(11-12):825-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1987.tb02419.x.
8
Glomerular hemodynamics and hormonal participation on cyclosporine nephrotoxicity.肾小球血流动力学及激素参与环孢素肾毒性的作用
Kidney Int. 1987 Jul;32(1):19-25. doi: 10.1038/ki.1987.166.
9
The effects of nifedipine on cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in rats.
Transpl Int. 1992;5 Suppl 1:S490-3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-77423-2_144.
10
Effect of felodipine on renal haemodynamics and tubular sodium handling after single-dose cyclosporin infusion in renal transplant recipients treated with azathioprine and prednisolone.非洛地平对接受硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松龙治疗的肾移植受者单次输注环孢素后肾脏血流动力学及肾小管钠处理的影响。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1995 Nov;55(7):625-33. doi: 10.3109/00365519509110262.

引用本文的文献

1
Calcium entry and 5-HT2 receptor blockade in oliguric ischaemic acute renal failure: effects of levemopamil in conscious rats.少尿型缺血性急性肾衰竭中钙内流及5-羟色胺2受体阻断:左旋维拉帕米对清醒大鼠的影响
Br J Pharmacol. 1996 Mar;117(6):1348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb16735.x.
2
Do calcium channel blockers have renal protective effects?钙通道阻滞剂有肾脏保护作用吗?
Drugs Aging. 1994 Oct;5(4):263-87. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199405040-00004.
3
Does nifedipine ameliorate cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity?硝苯地平能否改善环孢素A的肾毒性?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Aug 1;295(6593):310. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6593.310.
4
Changes in the venous compliance by bradykinin and angiotensin II and its significance for the vascular effects of cyclosporine-A.缓激肽和血管紧张素II对静脉顺应性的影响及其在环孢素A血管效应中的意义。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1988 Dec;338(6):699-703. doi: 10.1007/BF00165637.
5
Influence of nicardipine on renal function and plasma cyclosporin in renal transplant patients.尼卡地平对肾移植患者肾功能及血浆环孢素的影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;36(6):637-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00637751.
6
The pathophysiology of Sandimmune (cyclosporine) in man and animals.山地明(环孢素)在人和动物体内的病理生理学。
Pediatr Nephrol. 1990 Sep;4(5):554-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00869843.
7
Difference between aortic and renal vascular reactivity in cyclosporin A treated rats and the effect of cicletanine.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1992 Mar;345(3):356-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00168698.