Safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation in the real world.

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a VIrtual PulmonAry Rehabilitation (VIPAR) program in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with stable chronic lung disease at a spoke site received (VIPAR) through live video conferencing with a hub where 24 patients were receiving 14 sessions of standard, outpatient, multi-disciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in a hospital. We studied three such consecutive PR programs with 6-10 patients at each site. The hub had a senior physiotherapist, occupational therapist, exercise assistant, and guest lecturer, and the spoke usually had only an exercise instructor and nurse present. Uptake, adverse events (AEs), and early clinical changes were compared within and between groups. Travel distances were estimated using zip codes.

RESULTS

Mean attendance was 11.0 sessions in the hub and 10.5 sessions in the spoke (=0.65). There was a single (mild) AE (hypoglycemia) in all three hub programs and no AEs in the three spoke programs. Mean COPD Assessment Test scores improved from 25.3 to 21.5 in the hub (<0.001, 95% CI 2.43-5.17) and from 23.4 to 18.8 (<0.001, 2.23-7.02) in the spoke group, with no difference between the groups (=0.51, -3.35-1.70). Mean incremental shuttle walk test scores improved from 142 to 208 m (<0.001, 75-199) in the hub and from 179 to 316 minutes in the spoke (<0.001, 39.3-92.4), with a greater improvement in the spoke (=0.025, 9.31-133). Twenty-one patients saved a total of 8,609.8 miles over the three programs by having the PR in their local spoke, rather than traveling to the usual nearest (hospital) hub.

CONCLUSION

Video-conferencing, which links a local site to a standard PR program is feasible, safe, and demonstrates at least equivalent short-term clinical gains. Throughput can be increased, with less staffing ratios and significantly less traveling.