Walsh Eileen M, Li Sherian X, Black Libby K, Kuzniewicz Michael
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California.
Global Health Outcomes, Recro Pharma, Malvern, Pennsylvania.
AJP Rep. 2019 Jan;9(1):e76-e83. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683934. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
This study was aimed to compare health care costs and utilization at birth through 1 year, between preterm and term infants, by week of gestation. A cross-sectional study of infants born at ≥ 23 weeks of gestational age (GA) at Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities between 2000 and 2011, using outcomes data from an internal neonatal registry and cost estimates from an internal cost management database. Adjusted models yielded estimates for cost differences for each GA group. Infants born at 25 to 37 weeks incur significantly higher birth hospitalization costs and experience significantly more health care utilization during the initial year of life, increasing progressively for each decreasing week of gestation, when compared with term infants. Among all very preterm infants (≤ 32 weeks), each 1-week decrease in GA is associated with incrementally higher rates of mortality and major morbidities. We provide estimates of potential cost savings that could be attributable to interventions that delay or prevent preterm delivery. Cost differences were most extreme at the lower range of gestation (≤ 30 weeks); however, infants born moderately preterm (31-36 weeks) also contribute substantially to the burden, as they represent a higher proportion of total births.
本研究旨在按孕周比较早产和足月婴儿从出生到1岁期间的医疗保健成本及利用率。
对2000年至2011年期间在北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗中心孕龄≥23周(GA)出生的婴儿进行横断面研究,使用内部新生儿登记处的结局数据和内部成本管理数据库的成本估算。调整后的模型得出了每个GA组成本差异的估算值。
与足月婴儿相比,孕25至37周出生的婴儿出生住院成本显著更高,且在生命的第一年医疗保健利用率显著更高,随着孕周每减少一周,成本和利用率逐渐增加。在所有极早产婴儿(≤32周)中,GA每减少1周,死亡率和主要发病率就会相应增加。
我们提供了因延迟或预防早产的干预措施可能带来的潜在成本节约估算。成本差异在孕周较低范围(≤30周)最为显著;然而,中度早产(31 - 36周)出生的婴儿也对负担有很大影响,因为他们在总出生数中占比更高。