Suppr超能文献

稳定性冠心病患者生理狭窄严重程度与劳力型心绞痛限制运动时间的相关性。

Association Between Physiological Stenosis Severity and Angina-Limited Exercise Time in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

机构信息

Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;4(6):569-574. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1139.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Physiological stenosis assessment is recommended to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable angina.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between all commonly used indices of physiological stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time in patients with stable angina.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included data (without follow-up) collected over 1 year from 2 cardiac hospitals. Selected patients with stable angina and physiologically severe single-vessel coronary artery disease presenting for clinically driven elective PCI were included.

EXPOSURES

Fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were measured invasively. Immediately after this, patients maximally exercised on a catheter-table-mounted supine ergometer until they developed rate-limiting angina. Subsequent PCI was performed in most patients, followed by repeat maximal supine exercise testing.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Associations between FFR, iFR, HSR, CFR, and angina-limited exercise time were assessed using linear regression and Pearson correlation coefficients. Additionally, the associations between the post-PCI increment in exercise time and baseline FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (21 [91.3%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [8.1] years) completed the pre-PCI component of the study protocol. Mean (SD) stenosis diameter was 74.6% (10.4%). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) values were 0.54 (0.44-0.72) for FFR, 0.53 (0.38-0.83) for iFR, 1.67 (0.84-3.16) for HSR, and 1.35 (1.11-1.63) for CFR. Mean (SD) angina-limited exercise time was 144 (77) seconds. Anatomical stenosis characteristics were not significantly associated with angina-limited exercise time. Conversely, FFR (R2 = 0.27; P = .01), iFR (R2 = 0.46; P < .001), HSR (R2 = 0.39; P < .01), and CFR (R2 = 0.16; P < .05) were all associated with angina-limited exercise time. Twenty-one patients (19 [90.5%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [8.2] years) competed the full protocol of PCI, post-PCI physiological assessment, and post-PCI maximal exercise. After PCI, the median (IQR) FFR rose to 0.91 (0.85-0.96), median (IQR) iFR to 0.98 (0.94-0.99), and median (IQR) CFR to 2.73 (2.50-3.12), while the median (IQR) HSR fell to 0.16 (0.06-0.37) (P < .001 for all). The post-PCI increment in exercise time was most significantly associated with baseline iFR (R2 = 0.26; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In a selected group of patients with severe, single-vessel stable angina, FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were all modestly correlated with angina-limited exercise time to varying degrees. Notwithstanding the limited sample size, no clear association was demonstrated between anatomical stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time.

摘要

重要性

生理狭窄评估被推荐用于指导稳定型心绞痛患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。

目的

确定所有常用的生理狭窄严重程度指标与稳定型心绞痛患者的心绞痛限制运动时间之间的关系。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究包括从 2 家心脏医院收集的 1 年内的数据(无随访)。纳入了患有稳定型心绞痛和生理性严重单支冠状动脉疾病并因临床驱动进行选择性 PCI 的患者。

暴露因素

测量了血流储备分数(FFR)、瞬时无波比(iFR)、充血性狭窄阻力(HSR)和冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)。在这之后,患者在导管台仰卧式测力计上进行最大运动量运动,直到出现限制运动的心绞痛。大多数患者随后进行了 PCI,然后进行了重复的最大仰卧运动测试。

主要结果和测量

使用线性回归和 Pearson 相关系数评估 FFR、iFR、HSR、CFR 与心绞痛限制运动时间之间的关系。此外,还评估了 PCI 后运动时间的增量与基线 FFR、iFR、HSR 和 CFR 之间的关系。

结果

23 名患者(21 名[91.3%]为男性;平均[标准差]年龄为 60.6[8.1]岁)完成了 PCI 前研究方案的部分。平均(标准差)狭窄直径为 74.6%(10.4%)。中位数(四分位距[IQR])FFR 为 0.54(0.44-0.72),iFR 为 0.53(0.38-0.83),HSR 为 1.67(0.84-3.16),CFR 为 1.35(1.11-1.63)。平均(标准差)心绞痛限制运动时间为 144(77)秒。解剖狭窄特征与心绞痛限制运动时间无显著相关性。相反,FFR(R2=0.27;P=0.01)、iFR(R2=0.46;P<0.001)、HSR(R2=0.39;P<0.01)和 CFR(R2=0.16;P<0.05)均与心绞痛限制运动时间相关。21 名患者(19 名[90.5%]为男性;平均[标准差]年龄为 60.1[8.2]岁)完成了完整的 PCI、PCI 后生理评估和 PCI 后最大运动试验方案。PCI 后,中位数(IQR)FFR 升高至 0.91(0.85-0.96),中位数(IQR)iFR 升高至 0.98(0.94-0.99),中位数(IQR)CFR 升高至 2.73(2.50-3.12),而中位数(IQR)HSR 降低至 0.16(0.06-0.37)(所有 P<0.001)。运动时间的 PCI 后增量与基线 iFR 最显著相关(R2=0.26;P=0.02)。

结论和相关性

在一组患有严重、单支血管稳定型心绞痛的患者中,FFR、iFR、HSR 和 CFR 与心绞痛限制运动时间都有一定程度的中度相关性。尽管样本量有限,但解剖狭窄严重程度与心绞痛限制运动时间之间没有明显的相关性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise.运动期间冠状动脉血流的调节。
Physiol Rev. 2008 Jul;88(3):1009-86. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验