Duncker Dirk J, Bache Robert J
Division of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Cardiovascular Research Institute COEUR, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Physiol Rev. 2008 Jul;88(3):1009-86. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2006.
Exercise is the most important physiological stimulus for increased myocardial oxygen demand. The requirement of exercising muscle for increased blood flow necessitates an increase in cardiac output that results in increases in the three main determinants of myocardial oxygen demand: heart rate, myocardial contractility, and ventricular work. The approximately sixfold increase in oxygen demands of the left ventricle during heavy exercise is met principally by augmenting coronary blood flow (~5-fold), as hemoglobin concentration and oxygen extraction (which is already 70-80% at rest) increase only modestly in most species. In contrast, in the right ventricle, oxygen extraction is lower at rest and increases substantially during exercise, similar to skeletal muscle, suggesting fundamental differences in blood flow regulation between these two cardiac chambers. The increase in heart rate also increases the relative time spent in systole, thereby increasing the net extravascular compressive forces acting on the microvasculature within the wall of the left ventricle, in particular in its subendocardial layers. Hence, appropriate adjustment of coronary vascular resistance is critical for the cardiac response to exercise. Coronary resistance vessel tone results from the culmination of myriad vasodilator and vasoconstrictors influences, including neurohormones and endothelial and myocardial factors. Unraveling of the integrative mechanisms controlling coronary vasodilation in response to exercise has been difficult, in part due to the redundancies in coronary vasomotor control and differences between animal species. Exercise training is associated with adaptations in the coronary microvasculature including increased arteriolar densities and/or diameters, which provide a morphometric basis for the observed increase in peak coronary blood flow rates in exercise-trained animals. In larger animals trained by treadmill exercise, the formation of new capillaries maintains capillary density at a level commensurate with the degree of exercise-induced physiological myocardial hypertrophy. Nevertheless, training alters the distribution of coronary vascular resistance so that more capillaries are recruited, resulting in an increase in the permeability-surface area product without a change in capillary numerical density. Maintenance of alpha- and ss-adrenergic tone in the presence of lower circulating catecholamine levels appears to be due to increased receptor responsiveness to adrenergic stimulation. Exercise training also alters local control of coronary resistance vessels. Thus arterioles exhibit increased myogenic tone, likely due to a calcium-dependent protein kinase C signaling-mediated alteration in voltage-gated calcium channel activity in response to stretch. Conversely, training augments endothelium-dependent vasodilation throughout the coronary microcirculation. This enhanced responsiveness appears to result principally from an increased expression of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. Finally, physical conditioning decreases extravascular compressive forces at rest and at comparable levels of exercise, mainly because of a decrease in heart rate. Impedance to coronary inflow due to an epicardial coronary artery stenosis results in marked redistribution of myocardial blood flow during exercise away from the subendocardium towards the subepicardium. However, in contrast to the traditional view that myocardial ischemia causes maximal microvascular dilation, more recent studies have shown that the coronary microvessels retain some degree of vasodilator reserve during exercise-induced ischemia and remain responsive to vasoconstrictor stimuli. These observations have required reassessment of the principal sites of resistance to blood flow in the microcirculation. A significant fraction of resistance is located in small arteries that are outside the metabolic control of the myocardium but are sensitive to shear and nitrovasodilators. The coronary collateral system embodies a dynamic network of interarterial vessels that can undergo both long- and short-term adjustments that can modulate blood flow to the dependent myocardium. Long-term adjustments including recruitment and growth of collateral vessels in response to arterial occlusion are time dependent and determine the maximum blood flow rates available to the collateral-dependent vascular bed during exercise. Rapid short-term adjustments result from active vasomotor activity of the collateral vessels. Mature coronary collateral vessels are responsive to vasodilators such as nitroglycerin and atrial natriuretic peptide, and to vasoconstrictors such as vasopressin, angiotensin II, and the platelet products serotonin and thromboxane A(2). During exercise, ss-adrenergic activity and endothelium-derived NO and prostanoids exert vasodilator influences on coronary collateral vessels. Importantly, alterations in collateral vasomotor tone, e.g., by exogenous vasopressin, inhibition of endogenous NO or prostanoid production, or increasing local adenosine production can modify collateral conductance, thereby influencing the blood supply to the dependent myocardium. In addition, vasomotor activity in the resistance vessels of the collateral perfused vascular bed can influence the volume and distribution of blood flow within the collateral zone. Finally, there is evidence that vasomotor control of resistance vessels in the normally perfused regions of collateralized hearts is altered, indicating that the vascular adaptations in hearts with a flow-limiting coronary obstruction occur at a global as well as a regional level. Exercise training does not stimulate growth of coronary collateral vessels in the normal heart. However, if exercise produces ischemia, which would be absent or minimal under resting conditions, there is evidence that collateral growth can be enhanced. In addition to ischemia, the pressure gradient between vascular beds, which is a determinant of the flow rate and therefore the shear stress on the collateral vessel endothelium, may also be important in stimulating growth of collateral vessels.
运动是增加心肌需氧量的最重要生理刺激因素。运动肌肉对增加血流的需求使得心输出量增加,进而导致心肌需氧量的三个主要决定因素增加:心率、心肌收缩力和心室作功。在剧烈运动期间,左心室的需氧量大约增加6倍,这主要通过增加冠状动脉血流量(约5倍)来满足,因为在大多数物种中,血红蛋白浓度和氧摄取(在静息时已达70 - 80%)仅适度增加。相比之下,右心室在静息时氧摄取较低,运动期间显著增加,类似于骨骼肌,这表明这两个心腔在血流调节方面存在根本差异。心率增加还会增加收缩期所花费的相对时间,从而增加作用于左心室壁内微血管,特别是其心内膜下层微血管的净血管外压缩力。因此,适当调节冠状动脉血管阻力对于心脏对运动的反应至关重要。冠状动脉阻力血管张力是多种血管舒张剂和血管收缩剂影响的结果,包括神经激素以及内皮和心肌因素。阐明运动时控制冠状动脉舒张的综合机制一直很困难,部分原因是冠状动脉血管运动控制存在冗余以及动物物种之间存在差异。运动训练与冠状动脉微血管的适应性变化有关,包括小动脉密度和/或直径增加,这为运动训练动物中观察到的冠状动脉血流峰值增加提供了形态学基础。在通过跑步机运动训练的大型动物中,新毛细血管的形成使毛细血管密度维持在与运动诱导的生理性心肌肥大程度相称的水平。然而,训练会改变冠状动脉血管阻力的分布,从而招募更多毛细血管,导致通透表面积乘积增加而毛细血管数量密度不变。在循环儿茶酚胺水平较低的情况下,α和β肾上腺素能张力的维持似乎是由于受体对肾上腺素能刺激的反应性增加。运动训练还会改变冠状动脉阻力血管的局部控制。因此,小动脉表现出增加的肌源性张力,这可能是由于电压门控钙通道活性在拉伸反应中通过钙依赖性蛋白激酶C信号介导的改变。相反,训练会增强整个冠状动脉微循环中内皮依赖性血管舒张。这种增强的反应性似乎主要源于一氧化氮(NO)合酶表达的增加。最后,体育锻炼会降低静息时和同等运动水平下的血管外压缩力,主要是因为心率降低。由于心外膜冠状动脉狭窄导致的冠状动脉流入阻抗会导致运动期间心肌血流从心内膜下层向心外膜下层显著重新分布。然而,与传统观点认为心肌缺血会导致微血管最大程度舒张相反,最近的研究表明,冠状动脉微血管在运动诱导的缺血期间保留一定程度的血管舒张储备,并且仍然对血管收缩刺激有反应。这些观察结果需要重新评估微循环中血流阻力的主要部位。相当一部分阻力位于小动脉,这些小动脉不受心肌代谢控制,但对剪切力和硝基血管舒张剂敏感。冠状动脉侧支循环系统是一个动脉间血管的动态网络,它可以进行长期和短期调节,从而调节对依赖心肌的血流。长期调节包括侧支血管在动脉闭塞反应中的募集和生长,这是时间依赖性的,并决定运动期间侧支依赖血管床可获得的最大血流速率。快速的短期调节是由侧支血管的主动血管运动活动引起的。成熟的冠状动脉侧支血管对血管舒张剂如硝酸甘油和心房利钠肽有反应,对血管收缩剂如血管加压素、血管紧张素II以及血小板产物5 - 羟色胺和血栓素A2也有反应。在运动期间,β肾上腺素能活性以及内皮衍生的NO和前列腺素对冠状动脉侧支血管发挥血管舒张作用。重要的是,侧支血管运动张力的改变,例如通过外源性血管加压素、抑制内源性NO或前列腺素产生或增加局部腺苷产生,可以改变侧支传导,从而影响对依赖心肌的血液供应。此外,侧支灌注血管床阻力血管中的血管运动活动可以影响侧支区内的血流体积和分布。最后,有证据表明,侧支循环心脏正常灌注区域阻力血管的血管运动控制发生改变,这表明在存在血流限制冠状动脉阻塞的心脏中,血管适应性变化发生在整体和区域水平。运动训练不会刺激正常心脏中冠状动脉侧支血管的生长。然而,如果运动产生缺血,而在静息条件下这种缺血不存在或很轻微,有证据表明侧支生长可以增强。除了缺血外,血管床之间的压力梯度,它是流速的决定因素,因此也是侧支血管内皮上剪切应力的决定因素,在刺激侧支血管生长方面也可能很重要。