Suppr超能文献

血管优先与动脉优先手术技术对非小细胞肺癌患者循环肿瘤细胞和生存的影响:一项随机临床试验和基于登记的倾向评分匹配分析。

Effect of Vein-First vs Artery-First Surgical Technique on Circulating Tumor Cells and Survival in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Registry-Based Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Western China Collaborative Innovation Center for Early Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Lung Cancer, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):e190972. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0972. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

It is important to develop a surgical technique to reduce dissemination of tumor cells into the blood during surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of different sequences of vessel ligation during surgery on the dissemination of tumor cells and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2016 to March 2018 with patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received thoracoscopic lobectomy in West China Hospital, Daping Hospital, and Sichuan Cancer Hospital. To further compare survival outcomes of the 2 procedures, we reviewed the Western China Lung Cancer database (2005-2017) using the same inclusion criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

Vein-first procedure vs artery-first procedure.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) after surgery and 5-year overall, disease-free, and lung cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 86 individuals were randomized; 22 patients (25.6%) were younger and 64 (74.4%) older than 60 years. Of these, 78 patients were analyzed. After surgery, an incremental change in FR+CTCs was observed in 26 of 40 patients (65.0%) in the artery-first group and 12 of 38 (31.6%) in the vein-first group (P = .003) (median change, 0.73 [interquartile range (IQR), -0.86 to 1.58] FU per 3 mL vs -0.50 [IQR, -2.53 to 0.79] FU per 3 mL; P = .006). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the artery-first procedure was a risk factor for FR+CTC increase during surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 4.03 [95% CI, 1.53-10.63]; P = .005). The propensity-matched analysis included 420 patients (210 with vein-first procedures and 210 with artery-first procedures). The vein-first group had significantly better outcomes than the artery-first group for 5-year overall survival (73.6% [95% CI, 64.4%-82.8%] vs 57.6% [95% CI, 48.4%-66.8%]; P = .002), disease-free survival (63.6% [95% CI, 55.4%-73.8%] vs 48.4% [95% CI, 40.0%-56.8%]; P = .001), and lung cancer-specific survival (76.4% [95% CI, 67.6%-85.2%] vs 59.9% [95% CI, 50.5%-69.3%]; P = .002). Multivariate analyses revealed that the artery-first procedure was a prognostic factor of poorer 5-year overall survival (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.07-2.56]; P = .03), disease-free survival (HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.01-2.04]; P = .05) and lung cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.65 [95% CI, 1.04-2.61]; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Ligating effluent veins first during surgery may reduce tumor cell dissemination and improve survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03436329.

摘要

重要性

开发一种外科技术,以减少手术过程中肿瘤细胞向血液中的扩散是很重要的。

目的

比较不同手术中结扎血管的顺序对非小细胞肺癌患者肿瘤细胞播散和生存的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:这项多中心、随机临床试验于 2016 年 12 月至 2018 年 3 月在华西医院、大坪医院和四川癌症医院进行,纳入接受胸腔镜肺叶切除术的非小细胞肺癌患者。为了进一步比较两种手术的生存结果,我们使用相同的纳入标准,回顾了华西肺癌数据库(2005-2017 年)。

干预措施

静脉优先与动脉优先程序。

主要结果和测量

手术后叶酸受体阳性循环肿瘤细胞(FR+CTCs)的变化以及 5 年的总生存率、无病生存率和肺癌特异性生存率。

结果

共有 86 人被随机分配;22 名患者(25.6%)年龄较小,64 名(74.4%)年龄较大。其中,78 名患者被分析。手术后,动脉优先组 40 名患者中有 26 名(65.0%)和静脉优先组 38 名患者中有 12 名(31.6%)(中位数变化,0.73[四分位距(IQR),-0.86 至 1.58] FU/3 mL 比 -0.50[IQR,-2.53 至 0.79] FU/3 mL;P=0.003)(中位数变化,0.73[四分位距(IQR),-0.86 至 1.58] FU/3 mL 比 -0.50[IQR,-2.53 至 0.79] FU/3 mL;P=0.006)。多变量分析证实,动脉优先程序是手术中 FR+CTC 增加的危险因素(风险比[HR],4.03[95%CI,1.53-10.63];P=0.005)。倾向性匹配分析包括 420 名患者(210 名接受静脉优先手术,210 名接受动脉优先手术)。静脉优先组的总生存率(73.6%[95%CI,64.4%-82.8%]比 57.6%[95%CI,48.4%-66.8%];P=0.002)、无病生存率(63.6%[95%CI,55.4%-73.8%]比 48.4%[95%CI,40.0%-56.8%];P=0.001)和肺癌特异性生存率(76.4%[95%CI,67.6%-85.2%]比 59.9%[95%CI,50.5%-69.3%];P=0.002)明显优于动脉优先组。多变量分析显示,动脉优先程序是 5 年总生存率(HR,1.65[95%CI,1.07-2.56];P=0.03)、无病生存率(HR,1.43[95%CI,1.01-2.04];P=0.05)和肺癌特异性生存率(HR,1.65[95%CI,1.04-2.61];P=0.03)的预后因素。

结论和相关性

手术中结扎静脉首先可能会减少肿瘤细胞的播散,并改善非小细胞肺癌患者的生存结果。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03436329。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Randomized controlled trials in lung cancer surgery: How are we doing?肺癌手术中的随机对照试验:我们做得如何?
JTCVS Open. 2024 Jan 20;18:234-252. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.01.008. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

4
No-touch isolation techniques for pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌的非接触隔离技术。
Surg Today. 2017 Jan;47(1):8-13. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1317-5. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
10
Challenges in circulating tumour cell research.循环肿瘤细胞研究中的挑战。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2014 Sep;14(9):623-31. doi: 10.1038/nrc3820. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验