Lobectomy With Artery Reconstruction and Pneumonectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Weighting Study.

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is based, when suitable, on surgical resection. Pneumonectomy has been considered the standard surgical procedure for locally advanced lung cancers but it is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Reconstruction of the pulmonary artery, associated with parenchyma-sparing techniques, is meant to be an alternative to pneumonectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study is based on a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the clinical and oncologic data of patients treated between 2004 and 2016 through pneumonectomy or lobectomy with reconstruction of the pulmonary artery. A propensity score weighting approach, based on the preoperative characteristics of two groups of 124 patients each was performed. The subsequent statistical analysis evaluated long-term and short-term clinical outcomes together with risk factors analysis.

RESULTS

The comparison between pneumonectomy and pulmonary artery reconstructions showed a higher 30-day (P = .02) and 90-day (P = .03) mortality rate in the pneumonectomy group, together with a higher incidence of major complications (P = .004). Long-term results have shown comparable outcomes, both in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (52.2% for pneumonectomy vs 46% for pulmonary artery reconstructions, P = .57) and overall 5-year survival (41.9% vs 35.6%, respectively; P = .57). Risk factors analysis showed that cancer-specific survival was related to lymph node status (P < .01) and absence of adjuvant therapy (P = .04). Lymph node status also influenced the risk of recurrence (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Lobectomy with reconstruction of the pulmonary artery is a valuable and oncologically safe alternative to pneumonectomy, with lower short-term mortality and morbidity, without affecting long-term oncologic results.