• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Selling health promotion to corporate America: uses and abuses of the economic argument.

作者信息

Warner K E

出版信息

Health Educ Q. 1987 Spring;14(1):39-55. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400106.

DOI:10.1177/109019818701400106
PMID:3104236
Abstract

Economic considerations constitute a significant factor in businesses' interest in adopting health promotion (HP) programs and in the wellness community's attempts to sell such programming to business. Substantial elements of both the business and wellness communities believe that HP programs are financially profitable, in addition to, and as a result of, improving employees' health. Examination of the foundation of this belief, however, leads to the conclusion that underlying analyses have been technically flawed and have ignored important costs of HP programs. This article discusses the limitations of these analyses and outlines the framework of a model that could provide a sound assessment of the economics of workplace HP programs. In general, it is expected that resultant analyses would find less direct profit potential in workplace HP programs but would emphasize the cost-effectiveness of many such efforts. The latter would force recognition that health, and not profit, is the principal benefit of health promotion programming. The distinction between the cost-effectiveness and cost-saving potential of health promotion is one that all interested parties should master.

摘要

相似文献

1
Selling health promotion to corporate America: uses and abuses of the economic argument.
Health Educ Q. 1987 Spring;14(1):39-55. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400106.
2
[Health promotion and wellness programs in private corporate organizations. Problems of trans-national and trans-cultural transferability].[私营企业组织中的健康促进与健康计划。跨国和跨文化可转移性问题]
Gesundheitswesen. 1992 Sep;54(9):451-9.
3
Economic implications of workplace health promotion programs: review of the literature.
J Occup Med. 1988 Feb;30(2):106-12.
4
Selling health promotion to corporate America: uses and abuses of the economic argument.向美国企业界推销健康促进:经济论据的运用与滥用
Health Educ Q. 1989 Spring;16(1):13-5. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600104.
5
Occupational health-promotion programs: evaluation efforts and measured cost savings.职业健康促进项目:评估工作与可衡量的成本节约
Health Values. 1989 Mar-Apr;13(2):3-10.
6
Corporate wellness programs can be cost-effective.企业健康计划可能具有成本效益。
Natl Saf News. 1984 Mar;129(3):70-2.
7
Using an ounce of prevention: does it reduce health care expenditures and reap pounds of profits? A study of the financial impact of wellness and health risk screening programs.采取一盎司的预防措施:它能降低医疗保健支出并收获数磅利润吗?一项关于健康与健康风险筛查项目财务影响的研究。
J Health Care Finance. 2009 Winter;36(2):1-12.
8
Nurses' intervention in specific risk factors in high risk employees. An economic appraisal.护士对高风险员工特定风险因素的干预:一项经济学评估。
AAOHN J. 1989 Sep;37(9):367-73.
9
Work-site health promotion: an economic model.工作场所健康促进:一种经济模式。
J Occup Med. 1991 Aug;33(8):868-73. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199108000-00011.
10
Return on Investment of Workplace Wellness: Evidence From a Long-Term Care Company.工作场所健康促进的投资回报:来自一家长期护理公司的证据。
Workplace Health Saf. 2021 Feb;69(2):81-90. doi: 10.1177/2165079920953052. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining and measuring the costs of the HIV epidemic to business firms.界定并衡量艾滋病流行对商业公司造成的成本。
Public Health Rep. 1994 May-Jun;109(3):311-8.