Suppr超能文献

肩锁关节切除术后持续疼痛:进一步手术是否有效?

Continuing acromioclavicular joint pain after excision arthroplasty: is further surgery effective?

作者信息

Dekker A P, Borton Z, Espag M, Cresswell T, Tambe A A, Clark D I

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal Derby Hospital , Derby , UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 May;101(5):357-362. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little published evidence exists on the incidence of continuing acromioclavicular joint pain with no published outcomes for revision surgery. This study aimed to establish the incidence and outcomes of revision acromioclavicular joint excision surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive retrospective cohort of patients undergoing revision arthroscopic or open acromioclavicular joint excision was identified. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database. Inclusion criteria were revision acromioclavicular joint excisions over a 14-year period between 2001 and 2015. Exclusion criteria were previous surgery for acromioclavicular joint instability or shoulder arthroplasty. Outcome measures were Oxford Shoulder scores and a satisfaction survey.

RESULTS

Forty-three consecutive cases of revision acromioclavicular joint excision over 14 years (37 after arthroscopic excision with subacromial decompression, 5 after arthroscopic excision with rotator cuff repair, 1 after open excision). Continuing acromioclavicular joint pain was associated with incomplete resection from arthroscopic surgery, which was the primary indication for revision surgery. Revision occurred a mean 14.2 months after primary surgery (standard deviation 7.6 months). Mean Oxford Shoulder score was preoperatively 18 (standard deviation 8.1) and 23.4 (standard deviation 11.1) after primary surgery, which did not reach significance until after revision surgery with a mean 31.7 (standard deviation 13.6; = 0.021). Median follow up was 15 months (interquartile range 4-31 months). A survey at a mean of 6 years (standard deviation 2.3) post-revision surgery found that 65% of patients felt improved, 77% would have their surgery again and 69% of patients felt satisfied. The incidence of postoperative frozen shoulder was 14.3%.

CONCLUSION

Functional outcomes after revision surgery showed improvement from scores taken before primary surgery; however, long-term satisfaction rates were relatively low.

摘要

背景

关于持续存在的肩锁关节疼痛的发生率,几乎没有已发表的证据,也没有关于翻修手术结果的已发表研究。本研究旨在确定肩锁关节翻修切除术的发生率和结果。

材料与方法

确定了一组连续的回顾性队列患者,他们接受了关节镜或开放肩锁关节翻修切除术。患者从一个前瞻性收集的数据库中识别出来。纳入标准为2001年至2015年期间14年内的肩锁关节翻修切除术。排除标准为既往有肩锁关节不稳定手术或肩关节置换术。结果指标为牛津肩部评分和满意度调查。

结果

14年间连续43例肩锁关节翻修切除术(37例关节镜下切除并肩峰下减压,5例关节镜下切除并修复肩袖,1例开放切除)。持续的肩锁关节疼痛与关节镜手术切除不彻底有关,这是翻修手术的主要指征。翻修手术平均在初次手术后14.2个月(标准差7.6个月)进行。牛津肩部评分术前平均为18分(标准差8.1),初次手术后为23.4分(标准差11.1),直到翻修手术后平均为31.7分(标准差13.6;P = 0.021)才达到显著差异。中位随访时间为15个月(四分位间距4 - 31个月)。翻修手术后平均6年(标准差2.3)的一项调查发现,65%的患者感觉有所改善,77%的患者愿意再次接受手术,69%的患者感到满意。术后肩周炎的发生率为14.3%。

结论

翻修手术后的功能结果显示较初次手术前的评分有所改善;然而,长期满意率相对较低。

相似文献

1
Continuing acromioclavicular joint pain after excision arthroplasty: is further surgery effective?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 May;101(5):357-362. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0039.
2
Acromioclavicular joint arthritis is not an indication for routine distal clavicle excision in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2090-2095. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06098-y. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Revision versus primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year analysis of outcomes in 360 patients.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):557-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560729. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: a comparative assessment at intermediate-term follow-up.
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2415-20. doi: 10.1177/0363546511419633. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
7
Arthroscopic resection of the distal aspect of the clavicle with concomitant subacromial decompression.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Mar;83(3):328-35. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200103000-00003.
8
The Role of Arthroscopy in Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty: Is Revision Always Necessary?
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1508-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.045. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Limited distal clavicle excision of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 May;102(3):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Apr;16(2):129-144. doi: 10.1177/17585732231157090. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of in vivo palpation-guided acromioclavicular joint injection assessed with contrast material and fluoroscopic evaluations.
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Aug;44(8):1135-9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2137-1. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
2
Comparison between open and arthroscopic procedures for lateral clavicle resection.
Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):783-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2161-5. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
3
Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: a comparative assessment at intermediate-term follow-up.
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2415-20. doi: 10.1177/0363546511419633. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
5
Open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection.
Arthroscopy. 2010 May;26(5):697-704. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.007.
6
Open versus arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint resection: a retrospective comparison study.
Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.010.
7
Complications after open distal clavicle excision.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Mar;466(3):646-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0084-4. Epub 2008 Feb 10.
8
The Oxford shoulder score revisited.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):119-23. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
10
The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 May;81(3):420-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b3.9044.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验