Dekker A P, Borton Z, Espag M, Cresswell T, Tambe A A, Clark D I
Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal Derby Hospital , Derby , UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 May;101(5):357-362. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0039.
Little published evidence exists on the incidence of continuing acromioclavicular joint pain with no published outcomes for revision surgery. This study aimed to establish the incidence and outcomes of revision acromioclavicular joint excision surgery.
A consecutive retrospective cohort of patients undergoing revision arthroscopic or open acromioclavicular joint excision was identified. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database. Inclusion criteria were revision acromioclavicular joint excisions over a 14-year period between 2001 and 2015. Exclusion criteria were previous surgery for acromioclavicular joint instability or shoulder arthroplasty. Outcome measures were Oxford Shoulder scores and a satisfaction survey.
Forty-three consecutive cases of revision acromioclavicular joint excision over 14 years (37 after arthroscopic excision with subacromial decompression, 5 after arthroscopic excision with rotator cuff repair, 1 after open excision). Continuing acromioclavicular joint pain was associated with incomplete resection from arthroscopic surgery, which was the primary indication for revision surgery. Revision occurred a mean 14.2 months after primary surgery (standard deviation 7.6 months). Mean Oxford Shoulder score was preoperatively 18 (standard deviation 8.1) and 23.4 (standard deviation 11.1) after primary surgery, which did not reach significance until after revision surgery with a mean 31.7 (standard deviation 13.6; = 0.021). Median follow up was 15 months (interquartile range 4-31 months). A survey at a mean of 6 years (standard deviation 2.3) post-revision surgery found that 65% of patients felt improved, 77% would have their surgery again and 69% of patients felt satisfied. The incidence of postoperative frozen shoulder was 14.3%.
Functional outcomes after revision surgery showed improvement from scores taken before primary surgery; however, long-term satisfaction rates were relatively low.
关于持续存在的肩锁关节疼痛的发生率,几乎没有已发表的证据,也没有关于翻修手术结果的已发表研究。本研究旨在确定肩锁关节翻修切除术的发生率和结果。
确定了一组连续的回顾性队列患者,他们接受了关节镜或开放肩锁关节翻修切除术。患者从一个前瞻性收集的数据库中识别出来。纳入标准为2001年至2015年期间14年内的肩锁关节翻修切除术。排除标准为既往有肩锁关节不稳定手术或肩关节置换术。结果指标为牛津肩部评分和满意度调查。
14年间连续43例肩锁关节翻修切除术(37例关节镜下切除并肩峰下减压,5例关节镜下切除并修复肩袖,1例开放切除)。持续的肩锁关节疼痛与关节镜手术切除不彻底有关,这是翻修手术的主要指征。翻修手术平均在初次手术后14.2个月(标准差7.6个月)进行。牛津肩部评分术前平均为18分(标准差8.1),初次手术后为23.4分(标准差11.1),直到翻修手术后平均为31.7分(标准差13.6;P = 0.021)才达到显著差异。中位随访时间为15个月(四分位间距4 - 31个月)。翻修手术后平均6年(标准差2.3)的一项调查发现,65%的患者感觉有所改善,77%的患者愿意再次接受手术,69%的患者感到满意。术后肩周炎的发生率为14.3%。
翻修手术后的功能结果显示较初次手术前的评分有所改善;然而,长期满意率相对较低。