Austin R Marshall, Onisko Agnieszka
Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Faculty of Computer Science, Bialystok Technical Univeristy, Poland.
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2016 Jan-Feb;5(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 21.
Questions have recently been raised about the acceptability of increased cervical cancer risk projected with the new guideline-recommended rescreening interval of 5 years after negative cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) cotest results. Additional data sources capable of evaluating cervical cancer risk over time are being sought. We employed the continuously updated Bayesian Pittsburgh Cervical Cancer Screening Model (PCCSM) to estimate invasive cancer risks for patients screened at extended screening intervals after negative HPV test results.
The analyzed database included cervical screening data collected over 10 years (2005-2014) at Magee Womens Hospital with 976,624 liquid-based cytology (LBC) results, 285,351 companion high-risk US Food and Drug Administration-approved HPV test results from LBC vials, and 112,435 follow-up histopathologic results from surgical procedures with cervical tissue sampling. Histopathologic cervical cancer risk estimates for patients with prior double negative results with cervical LBC and from-the-vial HPV cotesting were computed using the PCCSM for women rescreened at intervals ranging from 1 to 9 years. Similar risks were computed for women with any negative HPV test result, not considering cytology results.
Histopathologic invasive cervical cancer risk computed following LBC and HPV cotesting double negative results progressively increased with rescreening intervals of 1 to 9 years. Cervical cancer risks computed following any HPV-negative result, not considering cytology results, were consistently even higher at each comparable extended rescreening interval.
The PCCSM is a new data source that allows evaluation of cervical cancer risk over time. Cervical cancer risk is minimized with more frequent cytology and HPV cotesting.
最近有人对新指南推荐的在细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)联合检测结果为阴性后5年的重新筛查间隔所预测的宫颈癌风险增加的可接受性提出了质疑。目前正在寻找能够评估随时间变化的宫颈癌风险的其他数据来源。我们采用不断更新的贝叶斯匹兹堡宫颈癌筛查模型(PCCSM)来估计在HPV检测结果为阴性后以延长的筛查间隔进行筛查的患者发生浸润性癌的风险。
分析的数据库包括在梅杰妇女医院10年(2005 - 2014年)期间收集的宫颈筛查数据,其中有976,624例液基细胞学(LBC)结果、来自LBC样本瓶的285,351例美国食品药品监督管理局批准的高危型HPV联合检测结果,以及112,435例宫颈组织取样手术的后续组织病理学结果。使用PCCSM计算在LBC和来自样本瓶的HPV联合检测先前结果均为阴性的患者在1至9年的间隔时间内重新筛查时的组织病理学宫颈癌风险估计值。对于任何HPV检测结果为阴性的女性,不考虑细胞学结果,计算类似的风险。
在LBC和HPV联合检测结果均为阴性后计算的组织病理学浸润性宫颈癌风险随着1至9年的重新筛查间隔而逐渐增加。在每个可比的延长重新筛查间隔中,不考虑细胞学结果,在任何HPV阴性结果后计算的宫颈癌风险始终更高。
PCCSM是一种新的数据来源,可用于评估随时间变化的宫颈癌风险。通过更频繁的细胞学和HPV联合检测可将宫颈癌风险降至最低。