Institute of the Cervix, Federation Mutualiste Parisienne, Paris, France.
Int J Cancer. 2011 Aug 1;129(3):691-701. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25726. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
The APTIMA HPV Assay (AHPV) allows detection of 14 high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) RNA types in cervical specimens. Until present, the assay has been compared to HPV DNA tests only in triage settings. Herein, we compare AHPV with a DNA assay (Hybrid Capture 2; HC2) and liquid-based cytology (LBC; using PreservCyt ThinPrep liquid Pap) in a screening setting (French APTIMA screening evaluation [FASE] study). Women (N = 5,006) aged 20-65 were screened by gynecologists in 17 private practices in Paris, France. One cervical specimen was collected and tested with LBC, AHPV and HC2 assays. Women were referred to colposcopy if they were ASC-US+ in LBC or HPV positive in either HPV assay. To control for verification bias, a random group (14%) with normal LBC and dually HPV negative tests underwent colposcopy. Data from 4,429 women were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated for the three tests. AHPV and HC2 were highly sensitive for CIN2+ (92.0% and 96.7%) and CIN3+ (95.7% and 95.3%) detection and much more sensitive than LBC (69.1% for CIN2+ and 73.3% for CIN3+). Specificity of AHPV was higher than that of HC2, but similar to that of LBC (p < 0.001). Combining LBC with either HPV test slightly increased sensitivity but compromised specificity. AHPV assay is both specific and sensitive for the detection of high-grade precancerous lesions and may be considered as an option for routine cervical cancer screening for women over 20 years of age.
APTIMA HPV 检测法(AHPV)可检测宫颈标本中 14 种高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)RNA 类型。直到目前,该检测法仅在分流设置中与 HPV DNA 检测法进行了比较。在此,我们在筛查环境中(法国 APTIMA 筛查评估[FASE]研究)将 AHPV 与 DNA 检测法(杂交捕获 2;HC2)和液基细胞学(使用 PreservCyt ThinPrep 液体 Pap)进行了比较。在法国巴黎的 17 家私人诊所中,由妇科医生对 20-65 岁的女性进行了筛查。采集一个宫颈标本,并用 LBC、AHPV 和 HC2 检测法进行检测。如果 LBC 检查结果为 ASC-US+或两种 HPV 检测法均检测到 HPV 阳性,则对女性进行阴道镜检查。为了控制验证偏差,对随机组(14%)进行了 LBC 正常且双重 HPV 阴性检测,对其进行了阴道镜检查。分析了 4429 名女性的数据。计算了三种检测方法的敏感性、特异性和预测值。AHPV 和 HC2 对 CIN2+(92.0%和 96.7%)和 CIN3+(95.7%和 95.3%)的检测具有高度敏感性,且比 LBC 更敏感(CIN2+的敏感性为 69.1%,CIN3+的敏感性为 73.3%)。AHPV 的特异性高于 HC2,但与 LBC 相似(p<0.001)。将 LBC 与任何一种 HPV 检测法联合使用,虽略微提高了敏感性,但降低了特异性。AHPV 检测法对高级别癌前病变的检测具有特异性和敏感性,可考虑作为 20 岁以上女性常规宫颈癌筛查的一种选择。