Suppr超能文献

内镜超声预置定位标记物缩短操作时间优于后置加载标记物。

Endoscopic Ultrasound Placement of Preloaded Fiducial Markers Shortens Procedure Time Compared to Back-Loaded Markers.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, Wisconsin.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;17(13):2749-2758.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.046. Epub 2019 Apr 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fiducial markers are inert radiopaque gold or carbon markers implanted in or near pancreatic tumor to demarcate areas for image-guided radiation therapy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) pre-loaded fiducial needles (PLNs) have been developed to circumvent technical issues associated with traditional back-loaded fiducials (BLNs). We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare procedure times in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing EUS-guided placement of BLNs vs PLNs.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 44 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma referred for fiducial marker placement at 2 tertiary care centers were assigned to groups that received PLNs (n = 22) or BLNs (n = 22); each group had the same proportion of patients with tumors of different locations (head or neck vs body or tail).The procedure was standardized among all endoscopists and placement of a minimum of 3 markers inside the tumor was defined as technical success. The times for procedure and fiducial placement were recorded, total number of fiducial markers used documented, and grade of procedure difficulty ranked by passing the needle or deploying the fiducials. Other recorded variables included tumor characteristics, fluoroscopy use, and the number of fiducials clearly seen by EUS and fluoroscopy. The primary aim was to compare the duration of EUS-guided fiducial insertion of BLNs vs PLNs.

RESULTS

The median placement time was significantly shorter in the PLN group (9 min) than the BLN group (16 min) (P < .001). However, the 44% reduction in time did not reach pre-specified levels (≥60%). Similar results were found after stratifying by tumor location. Deployment of BLNs was easier than deployment of PLNs (P = .03). There was no significant difference between groups in technical success, number of fiducials placed, EUS or fluoroscopic visualization, or adverse events. During simulation computed tomography and image-guided radiation therapy, there was no difference between groups in visualization of fiducials, migration rate, or accuracy of placement.

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized controlled trial of 44 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we found EUS-guided placement of PLNs to require less time and produce similar results compared with BLNs. Further refinements in PLN delivery system are needed to increase the ease of deployment. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02332863.

摘要

背景与目的

基准标记是植入或靠近胰腺肿瘤的惰性放射性金或碳标记物,用于描绘图像引导放射治疗的区域。为了规避与传统背载基准标记(BLN)相关的技术问题,已开发出内镜超声(EUS)预载基准针(PLN)。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了接受 EUS 引导的 BLN 与 PLN 放置的胰腺腺癌患者的操作时间。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,将在 2 家三级护理中心就诊的 44 名胰腺腺癌患者随机分配到接受 PLN(n=22)或 BLN(n=22)的两组;每组中肿瘤位于不同位置(头部或颈部与体部或尾部)的患者比例相同。所有内镜医生均采用标准化操作,将至少 3 个标记物放置在肿瘤内部定义为技术成功。记录操作和基准标记放置的时间,记录使用的基准标记总数,并根据针穿过或基准标记部署的难易程度对操作难度进行分级。记录的其他变量包括肿瘤特征、透视使用情况,以及 EUS 和透视下可见的基准标记数量。主要目的是比较 BLN 与 PLN 的 EUS 引导基准插入持续时间。

结果

PLN 组的中位放置时间(9 分钟)明显短于 BLN 组(16 分钟)(P<.001)。然而,时间减少 44%未达到预设水平(≥60%)。按肿瘤位置分层后也得到了相似的结果。BLN 的部署比 PLN 更容易(P=.03)。两组在技术成功率、放置的基准标记数量、EUS 或透视下的可视化效果或不良事件方面无显著差异。在模拟计算机断层扫描和图像引导放射治疗期间,两组在基准标记的可视化效果、迁移率或放置准确性方面无差异。

结论

在一项 44 名胰腺腺癌患者的随机对照试验中,我们发现与 BLN 相比,EUS 引导的 PLN 放置需要的时间更短,效果相似。需要进一步改进 PLN 输送系统,以提高部署的便利性。Clinicaltrials.gov 编号:NCT02332863。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验