Ljungqvist L, Lyng J
J Biol Stand. 1987 Jan;15(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/0092-1157(87)90019-9.
The concentration in Lf units, of an unknown diphtheria or tetanus toxoid preparation is estimated in the flocculation test relative to reference preparations of tetanus and diphtheria antitoxins, respectively. By replacing the antitoxin reference preparations with toxoid reference preparations it should be possible to use immunological methods other than the flocculation test for the quantitative estimation of toxoids in Lf units. A number of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids were tested by rocket immuno-electrophoresis and single radial immuno-diffusion (Mancini test). The concentrations of the unknown toxoids were expressed relative to a diphtheria toxoid calibrated in Lf units (DIFT) and a tetanus toxoid calibrated in Lf units (TEFT), respectively. These two toxoid preparations are regarded as candidates for establishment as international standard preparations. The results obtained in the two tests were compared with those obtained in the flocculation test. In most cases the differences between the results did not exceed 10%. It is concluded, therefore, that the rocket electrophoresis or the radial immuno-diffusion tests can be used as alternatives to the flocculation test.
在絮凝试验中,相对于破伤风和白喉抗毒素的参考制剂,分别估计未知白喉或破伤风类毒素制剂的Lf单位浓度。通过用类毒素参考制剂替代抗毒素参考制剂,应该可以使用除絮凝试验之外的免疫方法来定量估计Lf单位的类毒素。通过火箭免疫电泳和单向放射免疫扩散(曼西尼试验)对多种白喉和破伤风类毒素进行了检测。未知类毒素的浓度分别相对于以Lf单位校准的白喉类毒素(DIFT)和以Lf单位校准的破伤风类毒素(TEFT)表示。这两种类毒素制剂被视为建立国际标准制剂的候选品。将这两种试验获得的结果与絮凝试验获得的结果进行了比较。在大多数情况下,结果之间的差异不超过10%。因此得出结论,火箭电泳或放射免疫扩散试验可作为絮凝试验的替代方法。