Trindade Bruno Lovaglio Cançado, Amaral Felipe Tayer, de Lima Monteiro Davies William, Cronemberger Sebastião
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2019 Apr 1;36(4):B132-B137. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.36.00B132.
This paper proposes a customized and versatile optical setup to evaluate the optical performance of different commercially available intraocular lenses (IOLs). The setup was used to measure the wavefront error induced by different IOL models, verifying and analyzing the magnitude of low- and high-order aberrations induced by currently available IOLs. Independent analyses included non-toric spherical and aspheric IOLs from three different manufacturers. Three different dioptric powers were tested: 15, 20, and 25 D from each model. Dioptric power, induced cylinder, and spherical aberration were measured in each tested lens. All lenses had dioptric power within the tolerated margin of error. Induced cylinder was also within the current standards and clinically irrelevant. Spherical aberration varied according to the analyzed dioptric power and to the IOL model. We reported on the importance of the plane where the spherical aberration is reported, IOL or cornea. All analyzed IOLs were within current standards for the dioptric power and induced cylinder. Spherical IOLs had higher spherical aberration measured at the IOL plane.
本文提出了一种定制的通用光学装置，用于评估不同市售人工晶状体（IOL）的光学性能。该装置用于测量不同IOL模型引起的波前误差，验证和分析现有IOL引起的低阶和高阶像差的大小。独立分析包括来自三个不同制造商的非环曲面球面和非球面IOL。测试了三种不同的屈光力：每个型号的15D、20D和25D。测量每个测试镜片的屈光力、诱导柱镜和球差。所有镜片的屈光力均在允许的误差范围内。诱导柱镜也在当前标准范围内且与临床无关。球差根据分析的屈光力和IOL模型而变化。我们报告了报告球差的平面（IOL或角膜）的重要性。所有分析的IOL在屈光力和诱导柱镜方面均符合当前标准。球面IOL在IOL平面测量时具有更高的球差。
