Suppr超能文献

黑人男性低危前列腺癌患者接受主动监测管理的流行率、预测因素及对合理应用的影响。

Prevalence, Predictors, and Implications for Appropriate Use of Active Surveillance Management Among Black Men Diagnosed With Low-risk Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Division of Hematology Oncology.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun;42(6):507-511. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000547.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines recommend that active surveillance (AS) be considered in the management of men with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). The objective was to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of an AS approach in black men (BM) diagnosed with LRPC after inclusion of AS in LRPC consensus guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BM and white men (WM) diagnosed with LRPC (prostate-specific antigen ≤10 ng/mL, Gleason score [GS] ≤6, clinical stage T1-T2a) between 2010 and 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Logistic regression models were used to assess the likelihood of AS over time and to examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics (SDCs) and the receipt of AS. A subanalysis was performed to assess the likelihood of GS upgrading on prostatectomy specimens for cases that received definitive treatment with radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Overall, 9% of BM (N=15,242) with LRPC were managed with AS. The likelihood of BM undergoing AS increased from 2010 and for all subsequent years of the study period (P<0.001). Uninsured BM were twice as likely as those with private insurance to undergo AS (odds ratio [OR]=1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-2.58; P<0.001). BM were less likely than WM (N=86,655) to receive AS (OR=0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.87; P<0.001). However, on multivariate analysis adjusted for SDCs, there was no significant difference in AS utilization between the 2 race groups. Nearly half of BM (47.5%) treated with radical prostatectomy had a postprostatectomy GS≥7, and BM were 17% more likely to experience postprostatectomy upgrading to GS≥7 when compared with WM (OR=1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of AS for BM with LRPC seems to be increasing, is influenced by SDCs, and may not differ from AS utilization among WM. Careful consideration of prostate biopsy technique and sampling as well as SDCs at time of treatment planning may be necessary to ensure adequate evaluation of prostatic disease and appropriate disease management for BM with LRPC.

摘要

背景

共识指南建议在管理低危前列腺癌(LRPC)患者时考虑主动监测(AS)。本研究的目的是评估在将 AS 纳入 LRPC 共识指南后,黑人男性(BM)被诊断为 LRPC 后采用 AS 治疗的患病率和预测因素。

材料与方法

从国家癌症数据库中确定了 2010 年至 2013 年间被诊断为 LRPC(前列腺特异性抗原≤10ng/ml、Gleason 评分[GS]≤6、临床分期 T1-T2a)的 BM 和白人男性(WM)。采用 logistic 回归模型评估随时间推移采用 AS 的可能性,并检查社会人口统计学特征(SDCs)与接受 AS 之间的关联。进行了亚分析以评估接受根治性前列腺切除术的病例在前列腺切除标本上 GS 升级的可能性。

结果

总体而言,9%的 BM(N=15242)LRPC 采用 AS 治疗。从 2010 年开始,BM 接受 AS 的可能性逐年增加(P<0.001)。与拥有私人保险的 BM 相比,没有保险的 BM 接受 AS 的可能性是其两倍(优势比[OR]=1.97;95%置信区间[CI],1.51-2.58;P<0.001)。与 WM(N=86655)相比,BM 接受 AS 的可能性较低(OR=0.82;95%CI,0.77-0.87;P<0.001)。然而,在调整 SDC 后进行多变量分析时,两组之间的 AS 使用率没有显著差异。近一半接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的 BM(47.5%)术后 GS≥7,与 WM 相比,BM 术后升级为 GS≥7的可能性高 17%(OR=1.17;95%CI,1.08-1.26;P<0.001)。

结论

对于 BM 低危前列腺癌患者,AS 的应用似乎在增加,受到 SDCs 的影响,与 WM 患者的 AS 应用无差异。在治疗计划时,需要仔细考虑前列腺活检技术和取样以及 SDCs,以确保充分评估前列腺疾病并为 BM 低危前列腺癌患者进行适当的疾病管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验