Laboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, UMR CNRS 8248, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, École normale supérieure, Université Paris Sciences & Lettres, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Apr;145(4):2277. doi: 10.1121/1.5094344.
Frequency modulation (FM) is assumed to be detected through amplitude modulation (AM) created by cochlear filtering for modulation rates above 10 Hz and carrier frequencies (f) above 4 kHz. If this is the case, a model of modulation perception based on the concept of AM filters should predict masking effects between AM and FM. To test this, masking effects of sinusoidal AM on sinusoidal FM detection thresholds were assessed on normal-hearing listeners as a function of FM rate, f, duration, AM rate, AM depth, and phase difference between FM and AM. The data were compared to predictions of a computational model implementing an AM filter-bank. Consistent with model predictions, AM masked FM with some AM-masking-AM features (broad tuning and effect of AM-masker depth). Similar masking was predicted and observed at f = 0.5 and 5 kHz for a 2 Hz AM masker, inconsistent with the notion that additional (e.g., temporal fine-structure) cues drive slow-rate FM detection at low f. However, masking was lower than predicted and, unlike model predictions, did not show beating or phase effects. Broadly, the modulation filter-bank concept successfully explained some AM-masking-FM effects, but could not give a complete account of both AM and FM detection.
调频 (FM) 被认为是通过耳蜗滤波产生的调幅 (AM) 来检测的,对于调制率高于 10 Hz 和载波频率 (f) 高于 4 kHz 的情况。如果是这样,基于 AM 滤波器概念的调制感知模型应该可以预测 AM 和 FM 之间的掩蔽效应。为了验证这一点,测试了正常听力者在正弦波 FM 检测阈值上的正弦波 AM 掩蔽效应,作为 FM 速率、f、持续时间、AM 速率、AM 深度以及 FM 和 AM 之间的相位差的函数。将数据与实现 AM 滤波器组的计算模型的预测进行了比较。与模型预测一致,AM 掩蔽了具有某些 AM 掩蔽 - AM 特征(宽调谐和 AM 掩蔽深度的影响)的 FM。在 2 Hz AM 掩蔽器的情况下,在 f = 0.5 和 5 kHz 处预测和观察到了类似的掩蔽,这与以下观点不一致,即额外的(例如,时间精细结构)线索会在低 f 处驱动慢速率 FM 检测。然而,掩蔽程度低于预测值,并且与模型预测不同,它没有表现出拍频或相位效应。总体而言,调制滤波器组概念成功地解释了一些 AM 掩蔽 - FM 效应,但不能完全解释 AM 和 FM 检测。