Suppr超能文献

仅有“轻微”的听力损失和双耳处理能力下降。

No more than "slight" hearing loss and degradations in binaural processing.

机构信息

Departments of Neuroscience and Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Apr;145(4):2094. doi: 10.1121/1.5096652.

Abstract

Listeners having, at most, "slight" hearing loss may exhibit substantial deficits in binaural detection [Bernstein and Trahiotis. (2016). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 3540-3548; (2018). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144, 292-307]. This study assessed whether such listeners also exhibit deficits discriminating interaural temporal disparities (ITDs) or interaural intensitive disparities (IIDs) and whether any deficits observed in those discrimination tasks would be accounted for by the interaural cross-correlation based model that successfully accounts for binaural detection. Thresholds were measured for detection of tones masked by noise in the NoSπ configuration and discrimination of ITD or IID. Gaussian noises (100 Hz-wide), served as maskers in the detection task and as reference and target stimuli in the discrimination tasks. Stimuli were centered at 500 Hz or 4 kHz. The latter were transpositions of stimuli centered at 125 Hz. Results demonstrate that listeners having, at most, slight hearing loss and who exhibit deficits in binaural detection, also exhibit deficits in ITD- and IID-discrimination. Coupled with appropriate decision variables, the cross-correlation-based model that accounts for elevated binaural detection thresholds among such listeners also accounted for their elevated ITD- and IID-thresholds. The deficits in all three tasks appear to stem from increased levels of stimulus-dependent, additive internal noise.

摘要

听力损失程度较轻的听众可能在双耳检测中表现出明显的缺陷[Bernstein 和 Trahiotis. (2016). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 3540-3548; (2018). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144, 292-307]。本研究评估了这些听众是否也在辨别两耳时间差(ITD)或两耳强度差(IID)方面存在缺陷,以及在这些辨别任务中观察到的任何缺陷是否可以通过成功解释双耳检测的基于耳间互相关的模型来解释。在 NoSπ 配置下,通过噪声掩蔽来测量检测纯音的阈值,并对 ITD 或 IID 进行辨别。高斯噪声(100Hz 宽)在检测任务中作为掩蔽噪声,在辨别任务中作为参考和目标刺激。刺激中心频率为 500Hz 或 4kHz。后者是中心频率为 125Hz 的刺激的转位。结果表明,听力损失程度较轻且在双耳检测中存在缺陷的听众,在 ITD 和 IID 辨别中也存在缺陷。与适当的决策变量相结合,能够解释此类听众双耳检测阈值升高的基于互相关的模型,也能够解释他们的 ITD 和 IID 阈值升高。所有三个任务的缺陷似乎都源于刺激相关的附加内部噪声水平的增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验