Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 Northeast 42nd Street, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Jun;149(6):4630. doi: 10.1121/10.0005123.
The interaural level difference (ILD) is a robust indicator of sound source azimuth, and human ILD sensitivity persists under conditions that degrade normally-dominant interaural time difference (ITD) cues. Nonetheless, ILD sensitivity varies somewhat with both stimulus frequency and interaural correlation (coherence). To further investigate the combined binaural perceptual influence of these variables, the present study assessed ILD sensitivity at frequencies 250-4000 Hz using stimuli of varied interaural correlation. In the first of two experiments, ILD discrimination thresholds were modestly elevated, and subjective lateralization slightly reduced, for both half-correlated and uncorrelated narrowband noise tokens relative to correlated tokens. Different from thresholds in the correlated condition, which were worst at 1000 Hz [Grantham, D.W. (1984). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 1191-1194], thresholds in the decorrelated conditions were independent of frequency. However, intrinsic envelope fluctuations in narrowband stimuli caused moment-to-moment variation of the nominal ILD, complicating interpretation of measured thresholds. Thus, a second experiment employed low-fluctuation noise tokens, revealing a clear effect of interaural decoherence per se that was strongly frequency-dependent, decreasing in magnitude from low to high frequencies. Measurements are consistent with known integration times in ILD-sensitive neurons and also suggest persistent influences of covert ITD cues in putative "ILD" tasks.
两耳间强度差(ILD)是声源方位的一个强有力的指示符,即使在那些会降低主导的两耳时间差(ITD)线索的正常条件下,人类的 ILD 敏感性仍然存在。尽管如此,ILD 敏感性在刺激频率和两耳相关性(相干性)方面还是略有变化。为了进一步研究这些变量对双耳感知的综合影响,本研究使用具有不同两耳相关性的刺激,评估了 250-4000 Hz 频率下的 ILD 敏感性。在两个实验中的第一个实验中,与相关的窄带噪声令牌相比,半相关和不相关的窄带噪声令牌的 ILD 辨别阈值略有升高,主观侧化略有降低。与相关条件下的阈值不同,相关条件下的阈值在 1000 Hz 时最差[Grantham, D.W. (1984). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 1191-1194],而去相关条件下的阈值与频率无关。然而,窄带刺激中的固有包络波动导致了名义 ILD 的瞬间变化,这使得测量阈值的解释变得复杂。因此,第二个实验采用了低波动噪声令牌,揭示了两耳去相关本身的强烈频率依赖性的明显影响,其幅度从低频到高频逐渐减小。这些测量结果与 ILD 敏感神经元的已知整合时间一致,也表明在潜在的“ILD”任务中,隐蔽的 ITD 线索仍然存在持续的影响。