• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试和反馈对放射影像判读技能遗忘曲线的影响。

The effect of testing and feedback on the forgetting curves for radiograph interpretation skills.

机构信息

a Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine , Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.

b Contrail Consulting Services , Toronto , Canada.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2019 Jul;41(7):756-764. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1570098. Epub 2019 May 2.

DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1570098
PMID:31046500
Abstract

Forgetting curves plot skill decay over time. After exposure to a simulation-based radiograph interpretation learning system, we determined the rate of learning decay and how this was impacted by testing (with and without feedback). Further, we examined the association of initial learning parameters on the forgetting curve. This was a multicenter, four-arm randomized control trial. Medical trainees completed 80 elbow radiographs and a 20-case post-test. Group 1 had no testing until 12 months; Groups 2-4 had testing every 2 months until 12 months. At 6 months, Group 3 testing was feedback-enhanced, while Group 4 had feedback-enhanced testing at 2, 6, and 10 months. There were 106 participants ( = 42 Group 1;  = 22 Groups 2 and 3;  = 20 Group 4). Group 1 showed an -8.1% learning decay at 12-months relative to other groups. In Groups 2, 3, and 4, there was no significant learning decay (+0.8%), and there were no differences in skill decay between these groups. Initial score and learning curve slope were predictive of retained skill. Learning decay was mitigated by exposure to 20 test cases (with and without feedback) every two months. Initial learning parameters predicted learning retention and may inform refresher education scheduling.

摘要

遗忘曲线描绘了技能随时间的衰退情况。在接触基于模拟的放射照片解读学习系统后,我们确定了学习衰退的速度,以及测试(有反馈和无反馈)如何对此产生影响。此外,我们还研究了初始学习参数与遗忘曲线的关联。这是一项多中心、四臂随机对照试验。医学实习生完成了 80 张肘部 X 光片和 20 例后测。第 1 组在 12 个月内不进行测试;第 2-4 组在 12 个月内每 2 个月进行一次测试。在 6 个月时,第 3 组的测试增强了反馈,而第 4 组在 2、6 和 10 个月时增强了反馈测试。共有 106 名参与者(第 1 组 = 42 人;第 2 和 3 组 = 22 人;第 4 组 = 20 人)。与其他组相比,第 1 组在 12 个月时的学习衰退率为-8.1%。第 2、3 和 4 组没有明显的学习衰退(+0.8%),这些组之间的技能衰退没有差异。初始分数和学习曲线斜率可预测保留的技能。每两个月接触 20 次测试案例(有反馈和无反馈)可减轻学习衰退。初始学习参数可预测学习保留情况,可能为复习教育安排提供信息。

相似文献

1
The effect of testing and feedback on the forgetting curves for radiograph interpretation skills.测试和反馈对放射影像判读技能遗忘曲线的影响。
Med Teach. 2019 Jul;41(7):756-764. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1570098. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Quantifying the medical student learning curve for ECG rhythm strip interpretation using deliberate practice.运用刻意练习量化医学生心电图节律条解读的学习曲线。
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Aug 15;36(4):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001248. eCollection 2019.
3
The effect of peer-group size on the delivery of feedback in basic life support refresher training: a cluster randomized controlled trial.同伴小组规模对基础生命支持复习培训中反馈传递的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 4;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0682-5.
4
Conveying practical clinical skills with the help of teaching associates-a randomised trial with focus on the long term learning retention.借助教学助理传授实用临床技能——一项关注长期学习记忆的随机试验
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0892-5.
5
Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm.考试后反馈中的紧张关系:用于学习的信息与伤害风险
Med Educ. 2017 Sep;51(9):963-973. doi: 10.1111/medu.13366.
6
Test-enhanced learning of clinical reasoning: a crossover randomised trial.临床推理的测试强化学习:一项交叉随机试验。
Med Educ. 2016 Jul;50(7):711-20. doi: 10.1111/medu.13069.
7
The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.形成性客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)期间的反馈质量取决于带教老师的个人情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0815-x.
8
Integrating 360° behavior-orientated feedback in communication skills training for medical undergraduates: concept, acceptance and students' self-ratings of communication competence.将360°行为导向反馈整合到医学本科生沟通技能培训中:概念、接受度及学生对沟通能力的自我评估
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0792-0.
9
Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training.在插管训练期间以数字或评论形式给出的任务导向型与自我导向型反馈。
Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):430-40. doi: 10.1111/medu.12397.
10
The impact of feedback during formative testing on study behaviour and performance of (bio)medical students: a randomised controlled study.形成性测试过程中反馈对(生物)医学学生学习行为和表现的影响:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 3;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1534-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Study of Case-Based Learning (CBL) Versus the Traditional Teaching Method for Enhanced Analysis and Interpretation of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Among Medical Students.基于案例的学习(CBL)与传统教学方法在医学生心电图(ECG)强化分析与解读方面的比较研究
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79587. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79587. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Retention of Critical Procedural Skills After Simulation Training: A Systematic Review.模拟训练后关键操作技能的保留:一项系统评价。
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Oct 16;5(3):e10536. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10536. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Effectiveness of blended learning versus lectures alone on ECG analysis and interpretation by medical students.
混合式学习与单纯讲座式教学对医学生心电图分析与解读能力的效果比较
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02403-y.
4
See One, Do One, Forget One: Early Skill Decay After Paracentesis Training.见一漏一忘一:腹腔穿刺培训后的早期技能衰减。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1346-1351. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06242-x. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
The Variable Journey in Learning to Interpret Pediatric Point-of-care Ultrasound Images: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.学习解读儿科即时超声图像的可变历程:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Jul 30;4(2):111-122. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10375. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
A think-aloud study to inform the design of radiograph interpretation practice.一项用于指导X光片解读实践设计的出声思考研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):877-903. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-09963-0. Epub 2020 Mar 5.