Yek John T O, Hunyor Alex P, Campbell William G, McAllister Ian L, Essex Rohan W
Department of Ophthalmology, Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australia.
Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Aug;2(8):757-764. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
To describe the anatomic and visual outcomes of eyes undergoing reoperation after failed primary surgery for idiopathic macular hole.
Prospective registry study.
One hundred three patients who had undergone failed macular hole surgery.
Unclosed idiopathic macular holes were identified from a large national prospective registry run by the Australian and New Zealand Society of Retinal Specialists. Unclosed idiopathic macular holes were defined as idiopathic macular holes that underwent vitrectomy surgery for the first time, but were never observed to close in the postoperative period. Surgeons were contacted to submit retrospectively details of subsequent management and long-term outcome of these eyes.
Macular hole closure; visual acuity (VA) change relative to baseline at 3, 12, and 24 months; and hole size at all time points.
One hundred three patients with failed macular hole surgery were identified, among whom 53 underwent reoperation, 49 did not, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Macular hole closure was achieved in 45 of 53 patients (85%) undergoing revision surgery. Mean change in VA from baseline in eyes undergoing revision surgery versus eyes that did not was +2.8 letters versus -1.9 letters at 3 months (P = 0.278), +8.2 letters versus -1.9 letters at 12 months (P = 0.167), and +18.3 letters versus -3.4 letters at 24 months (P = 0.022). Thirty-six percent of eyes with reoperated holes showed improved VA of 15 letters or more at 3 months after operation, increasing to 48% at 12 months and 65% at 2 years. Before revision surgery, mean macular hole size was observed to increase from 483 μm to 562 μm after failed primary surgery (P = 0.046).
In eyes undergoing revision surgery, reoperation for unclosed macular holes was significantly better than observation, although these visual gains took some time to occur. The surgical success rate was lower than that for primary idiopathic macular hole. The selection criteria for revision surgery need to be defined.
描述特发性黄斑裂孔初次手术失败后再次手术的眼部解剖和视觉效果。
前瞻性登记研究。
103例黄斑裂孔手术失败的患者。
从澳大利亚和新西兰视网膜专家协会开展的一项大型全国性前瞻性登记研究中识别未闭合的特发性黄斑裂孔。未闭合的特发性黄斑裂孔定义为首次接受玻璃体切除术但术后从未观察到闭合的特发性黄斑裂孔。联系外科医生以回顾性提交这些眼睛后续治疗及长期结果的详细信息。
黄斑裂孔闭合情况;术后3个月、12个月和24个月时相对于基线的视力(VA)变化;以及所有时间点的裂孔大小。
识别出103例黄斑裂孔手术失败的患者,其中53例接受了再次手术,49例未接受再次手术,1例失访。53例接受翻修手术的患者中有45例(85%)实现了黄斑裂孔闭合。接受翻修手术的眼睛与未接受翻修手术的眼睛相比,术后3个月时VA相对于基线的平均变化分别为+2.8字母对-1.9字母(P = 0.278),12个月时为+8.2字母对-1.9字母(P = 0.167),24个月时为+18.3字母对-3.4字母(P = 0.022)。接受再次手术的裂孔眼在术后3个月时有36%的患者VA提高了15个字母或更多,12个月时增至48%,2年时为65%。在翻修手术前,初次手术失败后黄斑裂孔平均大小从483μm增加到562μm(P = 0.046)。
在接受翻修手术的眼睛中,对未闭合的黄斑裂孔进行再次手术明显优于观察,尽管这些视力改善需要一些时间才能出现。手术成功率低于原发性特发性黄斑裂孔。需要明确翻修手术的选择标准。