Hogan Sarah, Greene Jillian, Flemming Jeffery
Memorial University of Newfoundland General Hospital, Health Sciences Centre, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's NL A1B 3V6, Canada.
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2019 Mar 26;2019:1432759. doi: 10.1155/2019/1432759. eCollection 2019.
To evaluate the nondiagnostic rate of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in pregnant and postpartum patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) to determine whether CTPA or ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scan should be considered first line imaging in this patient population considering their equivalent accuracy and the greater radiation exposure to proliferating breast tissue of CTPA.
All pregnant/postpartum female patients between 18 and 50 years of age who had CTPA within the Eastern Health Authority between November 2012 and November 2016 were included. Each scan was evaluated for nondiagnosis based on two criteria: contrast density in the main pulmonary artery, and respiratory motion artefact. If either of these criteria were not met, the scan was labelled as nondiagnostic.
The nondiagnostic rate overall was 43% (=83). This is similar to current literature values for rates of CTPA nondiagnosis, and comparable to the reported diagnostic quality of the reporting radiologist. This is much greater compared to rates of ventilation/perfusion nondiagnosis in comparable populations. Even in patients with normal chest radiographs, which represents the main patient group where VQ may be considered as an alternative, the nondiagnostic rate of CT is much higher.
This is the first study to attempt to identify an objective method of determining nondiagnosis in pregnant and postpartum patients undergoing a CTPA. Our results strengthen the argument that alternative imaging should be considered when investigating for PE in this population in order to protect the proliferating breast tissue, and VQ scan should be considered especially in patients with normal chest X-rays.
评估计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)在疑似肺栓塞(PE)的孕妇和产后患者中的非诊断率,以确定在考虑到CTPA和通气-灌注(V/Q)扫描准确性相当且CTPA对增生乳腺组织辐射暴露更大的情况下,哪种检查应被视为该患者群体的一线成像方法。
纳入2012年11月至2016年11月在东部卫生局接受CTPA检查的所有18至50岁的孕妇/产后女性患者。根据两个标准对每次扫描进行非诊断评估:主肺动脉内的对比剂密度和呼吸运动伪影。如果这些标准中有任何一项未满足,则该扫描被标记为非诊断性。
总体非诊断率为43%(=83)。这与当前关于CTPA非诊断率的文献值相似,且与报告放射科医生报告的诊断质量相当。与可比人群中通气/灌注非诊断率相比,该非诊断率要高得多。即使在胸部X线正常的患者中(这是可考虑将V/Q作为替代检查的主要患者群体),CT的非诊断率也高得多。
这是第一项试图确定一种客观方法来判定接受CTPA检查的孕妇和产后患者非诊断情况的研究。我们的结果强化了这样的观点,即在对该人群进行PE检查时,应考虑采用替代成像方法以保护增生的乳腺组织,特别是对于胸部X线正常的患者,应考虑V/Q扫描。