Khan Muhammad Amir, Khan Nida, Walley John D, Khan Shaheer Ellahi, Hicks Joseph, Sheikh Faisal Imtiaz, Khan Muhammad Ahmar, Ali Muhammad, Ahmed Maqsood, Khan Haroon Jehangir, Zachariah Rony
Chief Coordinating Professional, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Project Coordinator, Association for Social Development, Islamabad, Pakistan.
BJGP Open. 2019 Jan 23;3(1):bjgpopen18X101617. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101617. eCollection 2019 Apr.
Hypertension in Pakistan affects 33% of people aged ≥45 years, and in urban areas around 70% of basic health care occurs in private facilities.
To assess whether enhanced care at urban private clinics resulted in better control of hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, and treatment adherence.
DESIGN & SETTING: A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted at 26 private clinics (in three districts of Punjab) between January 2015-September 2016. Both arms had enhanced screening and diagnosis of hypertension and related conditions, and patient recording processes. Intervention facilities also had a clinical care guide, additional drugs for hypertension, a patient lifestyle education flipchart, associated training, and mobile phone follow-up.
Clinics were randomised in a 1:1 ratio (sealed envelope lottery method). A total of 574 intervention and 564 control patients in 13 clusters in each arm were recruited (male and female, aged ≥25 years, systolic blood pressure [SBP] >140 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >90 mmHg). The primary outcome was change in SBP from baseline to 9-month follow-up.Staff and patients were not blinded, but outcome assessors were blinded.
Nine-month primary outcomes were available for 522/574 (90.9%) intervention and 484/564 (85.8%) control participants (all clusters). The unadjusted cluster-level analysis results were as follows: mean intervention outcome was -25.2 mmHg (95% confidence intervals [CI] = -29.9 to-20.6); mean control outcome was -9.4 mmHg (95% CI = 21.2 to 2.2); and mean control-intervention difference was 15.8 (95% CI = 3.6 to 28.0; = 0.01).
The findings and separate process evaluation support the scaling of an integrated CVD-hypertension care intervention in urban private clinics in areas lacking public primary care in Pakistan.
在巴基斯坦,45岁及以上人群中33%患有高血压,在城市地区,约70%的基本医疗保健在私立医疗机构进行。
评估城市私立诊所加强护理是否能更好地控制高血压、心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素及治疗依从性。
2015年1月至2016年9月期间,在旁遮普邦三个地区的26家私立诊所进行了一项双臂整群随机对照试验。两组均加强了高血压及相关病症的筛查和诊断以及患者记录流程。干预组的诊所还有临床护理指南、额外的高血压药物、患者生活方式教育活页图表、相关培训以及手机随访。
诊所按1:1比例随机分组(密封信封抽签法)。每组13个整群中共招募了574名干预组患者和564名对照组患者(男女不限,年龄≥25岁,收缩压[SBP]>140 mmHg,和/或舒张压[DBP]>90 mmHg)。主要结局是从基线到9个月随访时SBP的变化。工作人员和患者未设盲,但结局评估者设盲。
522/574(90.9%)的干预组参与者和484/564(85.8%)的对照组参与者(所有整群)有9个月的主要结局数据。未经调整的整群水平分析结果如下:干预组平均结局为-25.2 mmHg(95%置信区间[CI]=-29.9至-20.6);对照组平均结局为-9.4 mmHg(95% CI = -12.2至-2.2);对照组与干预组的平均差值为15.8(95% CI = 3.6至28.0;P = 0.01)。
研究结果及单独的过程评估支持在巴基斯坦缺乏公共初级保健的地区,扩大城市私立诊所综合CVD-高血压护理干预的规模。