Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0272071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272071. eCollection 2022.
The prevalence of hypertension continues to rise in low- and middle-income- countries (LMICs) where scalable, evidence-based interventions (EBIs) that are designed to reduce morbidity and mortality attributed to hypertension have yet to be fully adopted or disseminated. We sought to evaluate evidence from published randomized controlled trials using EBIs for hypertension control implemented in LMICs, and identify the WHO/ExpandNet scale-up components that are relevant for consideration during "scale-up" implementation planning.
Systematic review of RCTs reporting EBIs for hypertension control implemented in LMICs that stated "scale-up" or a variation of scale-up; using the following data sources PubMed/Medline, Web of Science Biosis Citation Index (BCI), CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health, Google Scholar, PsycINFO; the grey literature and clinicaltrials.gov from inception through June 2021 without any restrictions on publication date. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, conducted data extraction using the WHO/ExpandNet Scale-up components as a guide and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We provide intervention characteristics for each EBI, BP results, and other relevant scale-up descriptions.
Thirty-one RCTs were identified and reviewed. Studies reported clinically significant differences in BP, with 23 studies reporting statistically significant mean differences in BP (p < .05) following implementation. Only six studies provided descriptions that captured all of the nine WHO/ExpandNet components. Multi-component interventions, including drug therapy and health education, provided the most benefit to participants. The studies were yet to be scaled and we observed limited reporting on translation of the interventions into existing institutional policy (n = 11), cost-effectiveness analyses (n = 2), and sustainability measurements (n = 3).
This study highlights the limited data on intervention scalability for hypertension control in LMICs and demonstrates the need for better scale-up metrics and processes for this setting.
Registration PROSPERO (CRD42019117750).
在中低收入国家(LMICs),高血压的患病率持续上升,但尚未全面采用或推广旨在降低高血压相关发病率和死亡率的可扩展、基于证据的干预措施(EBIs)。我们旨在评估在 LMICs 中实施的高血压控制的已发表随机对照试验(RCTs)的证据,并确定与“扩大规模”实施规划相关的世卫组织/ExpandNet 扩大规模组成部分。
对在 LMICs 中实施高血压控制的 RCTs 进行系统评价,这些 RCTs 报告了使用 EBI 进行“扩大规模”或扩大规模的变体;使用以下数据来源:PubMed/Medline、Web of Science Biosis Citation Index(BCI)、CINAHL、EMBASE、全球健康、Google Scholar、PsycINFO;灰色文献和 clinicaltrials.gov 从开始到 2021 年 6 月,对发表日期没有任何限制。两名审查员独立评估研究纳入情况,使用世卫组织/ExpandNet 扩大规模组成部分作为指南进行数据提取,并使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具评估偏倚风险。我们为每个 EBI 提供干预特征、BP 结果和其他相关扩大规模描述。
确定并审查了 31 项 RCT。研究报告了 BP 方面的临床显著差异,其中 23 项研究报告了实施后 BP (p <.05)的统计学显著平均差异。只有 6 项研究提供了描述,涵盖了世卫组织/ExpandNet 的所有 9 个组成部分。包括药物治疗和健康教育在内的多组分干预措施为参与者提供了最大的益处。这些研究尚未扩大规模,我们观察到很少有研究报告将干预措施转化为现有机构政策(n = 11)、成本效益分析(n = 2)和可持续性测量(n = 3)。
本研究强调了在 LMICs 中高血压控制的干预措施可扩展性的数据有限,并表明需要为这种情况制定更好的扩大规模指标和流程。
PROSPERO(CRD42019117750)。