• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多参数 MRI 对前列腺癌诊断的阴性预测值存在观察到的种族差异。

Observed racial disparity in the negative predictive value of multi-parametric MRI for the diagnosis for prostate cancer.

机构信息

Division of Urologic Oncology, Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside Building Suite 4954, Mailstop LKS 5046, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Aug;51(8):1343-1348. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02158-6. Epub 2019 May 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-019-02158-6
PMID:31049779
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the trend that despite recent advances in the screening, diagnosis, and management of prostate cancer (PCa), African-Americans (AAs) continue to have poorer outcomes compared to their Caucasian (CAU) counterparts. The reason for this may be rooted in biological differences in the cancer between the two groups; however, there may be some inherent disparities within the efficacy of the screening modalities. In this study, we aim to evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) between AA compared to CAUs.

METHODS

All mpMRI between January 2014 and June 2017 were evaluated. The MRIs were read by dedicated genitourinary radiologists. Subsequently, the readings were correlated to final pathology after the patients underwent radical prostatectomy. The NPV and negative likelihood ratios (-LR) of mpMRI were evaluated in AAs versus CAUs based on four cutoffs (≥ Grade I, ≥ Grade II, ≥ Grade III and ≥ Grade IV).

RESULTS

The mpMRI was almost equally as effective between AAs and CAUs in excluding Grade III (NPV = 89 and 94, respectively), and Grade IV or above (NPV = 96 and 98, respectively) PCa; however, the NPV of mpMRI was significantly lower for Grade I (NPV = 32 and 52, respectively) and Grade II (NPV = 50 and 79, respectively) PCa.

CONCLUSION

Despite advances in the screening for PCa, there are disparities noted in the efficacy of screening tools between AAs and CAUs. For this reason, patients should be risk stratified and their screening results should be evaluated with consideration given to their baseline risk.

摘要

目的

评估尽管近年来在前列腺癌(PCa)的筛查、诊断和治疗方面取得了进展,但与白种人(CAU)相比,非裔美国人(AA)的预后仍然较差的趋势。造成这种情况的原因可能源于两组人群之间癌症的生物学差异;然而,在筛查方式的疗效方面可能存在一些固有的差异。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估 AA 与 CAU 之间多参数 MRI(mpMRI)的阴性预测值(NPV)。

方法

评估了 2014 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月期间的所有 mpMRI。mpMRI 由专门的泌尿生殖系统放射科医生进行解读。随后,在患者接受根治性前列腺切除术后,将 MRI 阅读结果与最终病理结果进行相关性分析。根据四个截断值(≥I 级、≥II 级、≥III 级和≥IV 级),评估 AA 与 CAU 之间 mpMRI 的 NPV 和负似然比(-LR)。

结果

mpMRI 在排除 III 级(NPV=89 和 94)和 IV 级或更高分级(NPV=96 和 98)PCa 方面,AA 和 CAU 之间的效果几乎相同;然而,mpMRI 对 I 级(NPV=32 和 52)和 II 级(NPV=50 和 79)PCa 的 NPV 明显较低。

结论

尽管在 PCa 的筛查方面取得了进展,但在 AA 和 CAU 之间,筛查工具的效果存在差异。因此,应根据患者的基线风险对患者进行风险分层,并在评估其筛查结果时考虑这一点。

相似文献

1
Observed racial disparity in the negative predictive value of multi-parametric MRI for the diagnosis for prostate cancer.多参数 MRI 对前列腺癌诊断的阴性预测值存在观察到的种族差异。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Aug;51(8):1343-1348. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02158-6. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Staging Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Caucasian and African American Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.白人男性和非裔美国男性行根治性前列腺切除术时多参数磁共振成像的分期准确性。
J Urol. 2020 Jul;204(1):82-90. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000774. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET) and multiparametric (mp)MRI to detect intermediate-grade intra-prostatic prostate cancer using whole-mount pathology: impact of the addition of Ga-PSMA PET to mpMRI.使用全层病理检测前列腺中级前列腺癌时,镓标记前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和多参数(mp)MRI的诊断准确性:在mpMRI中添加镓标记PSMA PET的影响
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124 Suppl 1:42-49. doi: 10.1111/bju.14794. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [F]DCFPyL PET/MRI compared to multiparametric MRI: a comparison with the histopathology in the radical prostatectomy specimen, the ProStaPET study.前瞻性分析 [F]DCFPyL PET/MRI 检测临床显著前列腺癌与多参数 MRI 的对比:与根治性前列腺切除标本组织病理学的比较,ProStaPET 研究。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Apr;49(5):1731-1742. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05604-9. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan for pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer.术前 3-T 多参数 MRI 和 Ga-PSMA PET/CT 扫描对前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术病理结果的预测价值的组织学比较。
BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):71-79. doi: 10.1111/bju.15134. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
6
What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺穿刺活检中排除前列腺癌的阴性预测值是多少?来自欧洲泌尿外科学会前列腺癌指南小组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
African American Men have Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer Detection Despite Similar Rates of Anterior Prostatic Lesions and PI-RADS Grade on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.尽管在前列腺病变和 PI-RADS 分级方面,非裔美国男性的前列腺癌检出率相似,但他们的前列腺癌检出风险仍增加。
Urology. 2022 May;163:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
Accuracy of abbreviated multiparametric MRI-derived protocols in predicting local staging of prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.缩短版多参数 MRI 衍生方案预测行根治性前列腺切除术的男性前列腺癌局部分期的准确性。
Acta Radiol. 2021 Jul;62(7):949-958. doi: 10.1177/0284185120943047. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men.在前列腺癌诊断中使用 SelectMDx 尿液生物标志物检测与或不与 mpMRI 的临床应用:一项在未经活检的男性中进行的前瞻性、多中心研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Dec;24(4):1110-1119. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00367-8. Epub 2021 May 3.
10
The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.“mpMRI 是否足够”或 IMRIE 研究:一项多中心研究,比较了活检前多参数磁共振成像与活检。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1027-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Negative Predictive Value of a Prostate MRI in Black Men: Implications for Biopsy Decision-Making.前列腺MRI对黑人男性的阴性预测值:对活检决策的影响
J Urol. 2025 Jun;213(6):713-721. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004498. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Quantitative Multi-Parametric MRI of the Prostate Reveals Racial Differences.前列腺定量多参数磁共振成像揭示种族差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 16;16(20):3499. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203499.
3
Racial Disparities and Mental Health Effects Within Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌中的种族差异与心理健康影响

本文引用的文献

1
Whole mount histopathological correlation with prostate MRI in Grade I and II prostatectomy patients.I 级和 II 级前列腺切除术患者的前列腺 MRI 全组织病理学相关性。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Mar;51(3):425-434. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02083-8. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
2
Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality Across Gleason Scores in Black vs Nonblack Men.黑人与非黑人男性中不同Gleason评分的前列腺癌特异性死亡率
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2479-2481. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11716.
3
Self-reported Black race predicts significant prostate cancer independent of clinical setting and clinical and socioeconomic risk factors.
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Nov 3;10(4):39654. doi: 10.52965/001c.39654. eCollection 2022.
4
Health disparities and inequities in the utilization of diagnostic imaging for prostate cancer.前列腺癌诊断影像学利用中的健康差异和不平等。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4090-4096. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02657-6. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
自我报告的黑人种族预示着显著的前列腺癌,独立于临床环境以及临床和社会经济风险因素。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Nov;36(11):501.e1-501.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
Prostate cancer management choices in patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy compared to systematic biopsy.与系统活检相比,多参数磁共振成像/超声融合活检患者的前列腺癌管理选择
Urol Oncol. 2018 May;36(5):241.e7-241.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第 2 版是否能提高多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)报告前位病变的准确性?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jan;50(1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1753-1. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Disparities in staging prostate magnetic resonance imaging utilization for nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy.接受根治性放射治疗的非转移性前列腺癌患者在前列腺磁共振成像分期检查利用方面的差异。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jul 25;1(4):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2016.07.003. eCollection 2016 Oct-Dec.
7
What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺穿刺活检中排除前列腺癌的阴性预测值是多少?来自欧洲泌尿外科学会前列腺癌指南小组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
The Emerging Role of MRI in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance and Ongoing Challenges.MRI在前列腺癌主动监测中的新作用及持续挑战
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan;208(1):131-139. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16355. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
9
Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?比较三种不同的磁共振成像靶向前列腺活检技术:腔内与磁共振成像-经直肠超声融合与认知配准的系统评价。哪种技术更优?
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
10
Omission of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy from the MRI targeted approach in men with previous negative prostate biopsy might still be premature.对于既往前列腺活检结果为阴性的男性,在MRI靶向活检方法中省略系统性经直肠超声引导活检可能仍为时过早。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 May;4(10):205. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.53.