Department of Pediatrics (Neurology), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics (Neurology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e192914. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2914.
Studies of socioeconomic status and neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm neonates have not sensitively accounted for brain injury.
To determine the association of brain injury and maternal education with motor and cognitive outcomes at age 4.5 years in very preterm neonates.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of preterm neonates (24-32 weeks' gestation) recruited August 16, 2006, to September 9, 2013, at British Columbia Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Analysis of 4.5-year outcome was performed in 2018.
At age 4.5 years, full-scale IQ assessed using the Wechsler Primary and Preschool Scale of Intelligence, Fourth Edition, and motor outcome by the percentile score on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition.
Of 226 survivors, neurodevelopmental outcome was assessed in 170 (80 [47.1%] female). Based on the best model to assess full-scale IQ accounting for gestational age, standardized β coefficients demonstrated the effect size of maternal education (standardized β = 0.21) was similar to that of white matter injury volume (standardized β = 0.23) and intraventricular hemorrhage (standardized β = 0.23). The observed and predicted cognitive scores in preterm children born to mothers with postgraduate education did not differ in those with and without brain injury. The best-performing model to assess for motor outcome accounting for gestational age included being small for gestational age, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, white matter injury volume, and chronic lung disease.
At preschool age, cognitive outcome was comparably associated with maternal education and neonatal brain injury. The association of brain injury with poorer cognition was attenuated in children born to mothers of higher education level, suggesting opportunities to promote optimal outcomes.
在极早产儿中,研究社会经济地位和神经发育结果的研究并未敏感地考虑到脑损伤。
确定脑损伤和母亲的教育程度与极早产儿在 4.5 岁时的运动和认知结果之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为 2006 年 8 月 16 日至 2013 年 9 月 9 日在加拿大温哥华不列颠哥伦比亚妇女医院出生的早产儿(24-32 周妊娠)。在 2018 年进行了 4.5 岁的结果分析。
在 4.5 岁时,采用韦氏学前和初级智力量表第四版评估全面智商,采用运动评估电池第二版评估运动结果的百分位数分数。
在 226 名幸存者中,有 170 名(47.1%为女性)进行了神经发育结果评估。基于评估全面智商的最佳模型,考虑到胎龄,标准化β系数表明母亲教育程度的影响大小(标准化β=0.21)与白质损伤体积(标准化β=0.23)和脑室出血(标准化β=0.23)相似。在接受研究生教育的母亲所生的早产儿中,在有无脑损伤的情况下,观察到的和预测的认知评分没有差异。在考虑胎龄的情况下,评估运动结果的最佳模型包括胎儿大小小于胎龄、严重脑室出血、白质损伤体积和慢性肺病。
在学前年龄,认知结果与母亲教育程度和新生儿脑损伤同样相关。在受教育程度较高的母亲所生的儿童中,脑损伤与认知能力较差的关联减弱,这表明有机会促进最佳结果。